• @acosmichippo
    link
    English
    1229 days ago

    we don’t need to post every single macrumors article about the Mac mini.

  • Chemical Wonka
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    three 6k monitors is far from the realitty of 99,999999% of users

    • @MeepMorp
      link
      629 days ago

      I use four monitors for my WFH setup with a total of 11.8m pixels. Three 6k monitors is 37.3m pixels, more than three times what I’ve got. I’d be seriously considering this if I could run all four, but for now the hackintosh lives on.

    • @IsThisAnAI
      link
      429 days ago

      And? It’s clearly a feature for professionals. 3 4k monitors is currently a pain in the ass and does get used in business.

      • Chemical Wonka
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        even for professionals is too much. Few ones needs three 6k monitor

        • @QuarterSwede
          link
          3
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          Honestly, even 3 isn’t enough at times and I’m not doing anything crazy. Mostly Chrome, Teams, WhatsApp (ugh), Outlook, and Excel (god, so much excel).

        • @IsThisAnAI
          link
          229 days ago

          And yet you’ve somehow run into someone provisioning similar setups on Lemmy. Maybe apple knows their use base better than you think.

        • @Silic0n_Alph4
          link
          129 days ago

          So the new Mac Mini can do more than most people need for a cheaper price than most people would expect.

          Sounds awesome!

  • paraphrand
    link
    English
    529 days ago

    lol, in the example promo photo the third very expensive monitor is used to show a flyer promoting the music creation event being depicted. Great use case.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      129 days ago

      I feel like having a file explorer and web browser open on a different monitor when producing music is fairly typical