When Reuters reported in April that Tesla had scrapped plans for a long-promised, next-generation $25,000 electric vehicle, the automaker’s stock plunged. Chief Executive Elon Musk rushed to respond on X, his social-media network.

“Reuters is lying,” he posted, without elaborating. Tesla’s stock recovered some of its losses.

Six months later, Musk appears to have backed into an admission that Tesla dropped its plans for a human-driven $25,000 car. He said in an Oct. 23 earnings call that building the affordable EV would be "pointless” unless the car was fully autonomous.

  • rhythmisaprancer
    link
    fedilink
    31 hour ago

    I’m guessing that to him, the only market for the car will be for deliveries. Fleet use. He isn’t interested in consumer sales.

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    264 hours ago

    Musk is a fascist bigot. I wouldn’t drive a Tesla if it was given to me for free. Just walking up to it and seeing that T would piss me off. In a way, I’m glad he refuses to build a cheap EV.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 hours ago

      it’s easier to raise tariffs so that efficiently produced foreign electric cars are just as expensive. God bless America

  • Flying Squid
    link
    1087 hours ago

    “We can’t make an affordable Tesla unless we come up with something that would make it too expensive.”

    Gotcha.

    • @FireRetardant
      link
      526 hours ago

      Until we tax them ridiculously (50-100%) to keep things “fair” for the american auto makers that refuse to build anything smaller than a chevorlet suburban.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 hours ago

        This is why hes suddenly against it, theres no way Chinese EVs are coming stateside, and the US is even leveraging Mexico to keep them out of Mexico too. He doesn’t want to make the smaller profit margin thing everyone wants, because the government is just going to ban what everyone wants instead.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        115 hours ago

        Along with European, Japanese, and South Korean automakers. Nobody is building EVs this cheap because no other country’s government is dumping hundreds of billions of dollars into selling them well below their actual cost.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          84 hours ago

          Correct, because Uncle Sam is spending hundreds of billions of dollars to make oil and gas as cheap as possible while automakers spend bullions every year on stock buybacks. America’s poor investments are all China’s fault.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -33 hours ago

            You think European, Japanese, and South Korean automakers are American companies? That’s weird.

            Do you really think BYD and other Chinese state-owned auto manufacturers have found some secret sauce that nobody else can figure out allowing them to somehow build a car cheaper than anyone else in the world, or do you think it’s more likely that the state is paying for them to have artificially low prices?

            Furthermore, let’s imagine the rest of the world matches these subsidies, what is your end goal here? Are you wanting everyone in the US to dump their old car in a parking lot and go out and buy a new one every year like people used to do with smartphones? That’s not exactly good for the environment and is just consumerism on steroids.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              The way you write your argument out as questions makes you sound like Tucker Carlson or one of his “I’m jUsT aSkInG qWesTioNs” deciples.

              It comes off as condecending and disingenuous, even if some of your points may be correct.

        • Traister101
          link
          fedilink
          165 hours ago

          Aww that’s so sad. It’s a shame nobody has the economic wealth and power to absolutely dominate the market if they put a equal amount of money into EVs. I guess we’ll just have to keep spending our money on the military

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            04 hours ago

            So instead of healthcare or housing, you’d rather our tax dollars go to Ford and GM so that you can buy a cheap new car every year or two? At what point in history were new cars ever obtainable for most people? I make decent pay and even I have never owned a brand new car because buying used is a much better value.

            You’re arguing for the Walmartification of the auto industry and all it’s workers, where locally made goods are replaced with a bunch of cheaply made goods from an overseas sweatshop and all the local businesses go under. This isn’t good for anyone but the Chinese government.

        • @Grimy
          link
          9
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Every country subsidized their auto industry, it’s just that all the benefit goes directly to ceos except in china apparently.

          Ford received 9 billion in June.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -14 hours ago

            Ford received a loan to use toward building new factories for EV production. In China, Ford would owned by the government and funded with taxpayer dollars directly.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                03 hours ago

                Sure, when that rationalization comes with lax environmental regulations and zero worker protections along with heavy subsidies that expire just after their last competitors close up shop. What are you left with then?

                • @Grimy
                  link
                  1
                  edit-2
                  39 minutes ago

                  It’s better to keep private companies in charge of environmental regulations and worker protection, they will self-regulate.

                  God knows they won’t mouth fuck us the moment they have a monopoly at least.

        • @FireRetardant
          link
          125 hours ago

          Those automakers are at least trying to compete by building small cars. I see more ads for electric f150s than i see for compact cars in north america.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -13 hours ago

            Domestic manufacturers almost entirely phased out small cars long ago before EVs were even significant because they can’t build them as well as companies like Hyundai, Toyota, and Honda. Even those companies have phased out tiny cars because nobody in the US was buying them.

            Why don’t you buy a Chevy Bolt, or Nissan Leaf if you want a small, cheap EV?

            • @FireRetardant
              link
              33 hours ago

              It isn’t they can’t build them, it is moreso they don’t want to because of profit margins and influences from CAFE standards makes small cars hard to build and big SUVs easier due to some backwards fuel economy regulations.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                23 hours ago

                The same profit margins and CAFE standards that companies like Toyota, Hyundai, and Honda have to abide by too? This makes no sense as these companies were outselling domestic maker’s cars 5 to 1 in the exact same financial and regulatory environment.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  52 hours ago

                  Toyota and Honda have to meet similar regulations in markets that have those regulations but aren’t as insanely car focused as the US. They aren’t going to make a radically different Accord or Corolla for the US market just because they can. The leadership for US manufacturers are just lazy and have been for the past 50 years.

    • @SendMePhotos
      link
      327 hours ago

      I so badly just want a tiny electric vehicle. I don’t travel much. Just need it to go around town and maybe a town over.

      • @ChowJeeBai
        link
        87 hours ago

        Do you need windows? Renault has a couple of small ones, the Twizy and Zoe, in order of size. Dunno if they’re still available. Else in my country they have the BYD dolphin and Smart One Plus.

        • @givesomefucks
          link
          English
          247 hours ago

          Americans aren’t allowed to buy BYD personal vehicles…

            • @Warl0k3
              link
              9
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              We have to take the regulation we can get, okay? Not everyone can have legal systems that “make sense” like you get in them skandinavyvian hellholes. Catch me dead in a country where you can just assume the tap water is potable…

          • Flying Squid
            link
            117 hours ago

            Or import European EVs that aren’t pre-approved. No Renault Twizy.

      • @FireRetardant
        link
        -96 hours ago

        Sounds like a tram/light rail would be the perfect EV for you

        • @Jesusaurus
          link
          English
          186 hours ago

          Can you come install one near me?

          • @FireRetardant
            link
            56 hours ago

            Your best option is voting for people who will build transit in your local elections

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              22 hours ago

              “Hi boss I can’t come into work today because the guy I voted for lost and there no light rail”

            • @glimse
              link
              65 hours ago

              Il not saying DON’T do vote in local elections but solves the problem…in a decade or two…and it requires buy-in from surrounding districts.

              It unfortunately does not address the short term needs of commuters

              • @FireRetardant
                link
                25 hours ago

                And if we never build it it will never address the needs of commuters. Your government doesn’t think twice about a new road or expanding an existing one but will delay transit for years.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  116 minutes ago

                  Detroit in the 70s had more GDP than NYC and took that money right to congress. To this day giant automotive lobbies are the reason for not only legislation in the US but also city planning (or lack thereof) and the removal of public transport. To think getting a railroad is anywhere near as easy as a road is disregarding the influence of millions of dollars from people who would lose money if that rail was built.

                • @glimse
                  link
                  24 hours ago

                  Sure, but it’s not a one-or-the-other thing. The best solution now is to get a cheap EV AND vote for public transit

    • @Burn_The_Right
      link
      35 hours ago

      There’s at least one sure-fire way to remove leeches.