Meta sneakily introduced “Platform Integrity Attestation API” which basically calls home to see whether the user has a valid license to play.

This means that to run apps user has to have online connection to perform an integrity test. Whether it’s only a test on launch or continues call home like Denuvo-like DRMs is not yet clear. This could also mean that modified headsets could fail to pass this test essentially closing down the device for modifications that could damage “platform integrity”. Not all details are clear yet but this doesn’t look good.

Currently it’s optional and up to app developers to enable it.

  • @TastyWheat
    link
    English
    1861 year ago

    No fucking way I’ll consider buying one now.

      • @doppelgangmember
        link
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Or be like me. Get one then Meta buys the company. Z_z

        • Thanks4Nothing
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Bad luck man. I would have bought a rift if Facebook didn’t ruin it.

    • Chainweasel
      link
      English
      481 year ago

      I always wanted one, but when they made it a requirement to have and link a Facebook account to use it I completely lost interest.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        They took that out a while ago, that’s when I picked up the Quest 2. Honestly, it’s the best PCVR headset out there, and this article has nothing to do with PCVR, just their own platform. This won’t affect your ability to pirate PCVR games at all.

      • @ABCDE
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        Make a dummy one.

    • @SwallowsDick
      link
      English
      201 year ago

      Guess I’ll save up for the Valve one

        • ThrowawayOnLemmy
          link
          English
          8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s discontinued unfortunately, so don’t expect much in the way of support. But it is a great VR headset that you can get on the cheap ATM

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I’m really not a fan of Windows MR, both because it’s locked to Windows but also because it’s kind of temperamental, but it’s a good headset in terms of resolution at least (and comfort).

          Although I will admit it’s not as buggy as it used to be so that’s a plus.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Out of curiosity:

          I was looking into VR headsets half a year ago and found the PICO 4 interesting as a budget option to try VR.

          The Display of the G2 seems to be a lot better but costs an additional 250€. Does it really make the experience that much better and worth the bigger investment if you only want to try it out and fear that the headset will only collect dust after a month or so?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Honestly, If you are just trying out vr I think you should go for the cheaper option. I don’t have a frame of reference though as the G2 was my first headset. You also need to have a good enough GPU for the increased resolution.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Just an FYI, but the PICO 4 is made by ByteDance which is the parent company of TikTok. Facebook is awful but I don’t trust TikTok either.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m just waiting for the Psvr2 jailbreak. The index is nice, but their choice of display really leaves a lot to be desired. I far preferred even the slightly smeared look of my Odyssey+ to the Index, though the index’s tracking was miles ahead of my Odyssey. PSVR is the best headset on the market, but not worth my time unless it can be used forPCVR.

      • @WhiskyTangoFoxtrot
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        Or just pay $20 for one of the ones that you stick your phone in.

        • @ryry1985
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          My phone always overheated with those

    • @NounsAndWords
      link
      English
      161 year ago

      It seems (seemed) like a pretty good vr headset…just it’s owned by one of the worst companies and I have no interest paying them hundreds for that level of access to my personal information.

  • @AlternatePersonMan
    link
    English
    951 year ago

    …and there goes my eagerness to buy the Q3. I loathe drm.

  • DarkThoughts
    link
    fedilink
    861 year ago

    All the shills promised me and other doubters that something like this would never happen. I’m glad I lost all interest in Oculus the moment Facebook bought them.
    Hopefully we’ll see some solid info on the Deckard this year.

    • keeb420
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      Same. And it’s sad because, from what others have said, they are great vr headsets. Hopefully valve nails it with Deckard.

    • @TwilightVulpine
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      I so wish Facebook dropped Oculus so that someone else would do it properly.

  • @straF
    link
    English
    611 year ago

    So glad I avoid Meta products. I doubt they will be satisfied until they can live sell your data and display ads while you use the product.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Those are two very different things. Advertising giants don’t actually “sell” your data, it’s really not in their best interest, they make money by being the only ones with your data.

      • @cottard
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So… they sell, lease, etc either your data or some value added bullshit services or products based on your data for a higher price due to monopoly?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, they sell advertment slots to advertisers with promise of higher ad interaction, a promise they can keep because they target those advertisements to users that are more likely to interact with them using user data. User data isn’t sold, leased, whatever you want to call it.

          Also, technically not entirely a monopoly because there are quite a few tech giants that operate like this. Oligopoly would be the correct term.

  • 𝐘Ⓞz҉
    link
    English
    611 year ago

    Who the fuck are buying shit from google and Facebook? No wonder fucking internet is going to shits

    • @forgotaboutlaye
      link
      English
      311 year ago

      Google Pixel phones are the only phones compatible with GrapheneOS, so there’s one reason.

          • @scutiger
            link
            English
            61 year ago

            It’s not “unrooting” it’s just preventing your OS from being replaced. It’s an easy change for anyone with physical access to the device who can get past the lock screen, but can’t be done by accident. So you won’t be accidentally installing malicious software that will reinstall your OS, for example.

            The unlock/lock and install can be done through a website, but it requires your phone to be plugged in to a computer, and you can enable/disable unlocking through the developer menu in the phone’s settings.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You can also use the standard android CLI tools to lock and unlock the bootloader, but that web app is really convenient.

              Edit: and for anyone wondering, you can re-lock it with any ROM, or after rooting (you don’t lose root). I’m running grapheneos with a locked bootloader. Only difference between this and the stock ROM is a message that’s displayed when you boot that warns you the phone isn’t stock.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      The quest is amazing. It’s cheap and completely standalone while also giving you the ability to use it with pc vr games.

      • Zoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Cant figure out how to delete my own comment. Ignore me

      • @Graphine
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        If you got a good PC for VR the Quest is great to use. I played HL Alyx on it which was incredible.

        But the DRM BS though…at this point the Pico is looking better for standalone use

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          What DRM BS? This article? I’ve explained why it’s a whole bunch of fear mongering. There have been apps and games that require always online long before this api came around.

  • @zeekzag
    link
    English
    53
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • @Nelots
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      Thanks. I’ll be checking these out later.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I’m also glad I’ve kept my quest isolated from the internet once I enabled dev mode (for oculess). I’ve noticed it tries to connect to IP addresses owned by Meta (according to whois), without any dns queries involved. Your pihole won’t be able to block that… I went a few steps farther and set up a dedicated wifi network that only allows local traffic. Then I set up a http proxy (squid) that only allows connections to certain websites. I mostly use the quest for PCVR though, so the proxy doesn’t get much use.

      And thanks for sharing oculuskiller! I’ve been looking for something like that for a while.

      • @zeekzag
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Liiiiiitle bit of an outrage attempting title.

    The API is being added, it’s optional for developers, and the person that is quoted in the article even says that it’s not really going to be used for that.

    Also there’s never been anything stopping developers from making their games “always online” to begin with, so this changes nothing.

    This is like saying steam requires always online simply because an api exists for online checking drm.

    • Dr. MooseOP
      link
      English
      241 year ago

      Not a fair comparison to Steam as it allows indefinite-ish offline access as long as you check in once. This new Quest restriction has nothing like this. It’s more similar to DRM systems like Denuvo that call home on startup or during play time. The API also checks device integrity which means access to apps could be disabled for modified devices and Steam does nothing of sort.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The comparison was that the ability to enforce always online exists in steam, just like it will here. Neither will mandate it.

        The ability to do this isn’t only being added now, it’s just that meta have made an api for it that developers can use if they want instead of writing their own.

        • Dr. MooseOP
          link
          English
          8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Honestly I’m not as optimistic as you are. Official API gives implicit permission for DRM. Right now if an APP did this it would be review bombed and suffer backslash. With official API it’ll slowly normalizes DRM and suddenly everything requires online.

          Quest is getting more closed with every release - remember when Facebook login was not required? The whole dev ecosystem is getting more complex with every update. This seems like an up-coming trend especially now that Quests main competition will be an extremely closed ecosystem of Apple. This will give Quest permision to basically lock down more.

          My bet is that a year in most of the apps will have this DRM though I’d love to be proven wrong. I love my Quest 2 and only use it to draw/sculpt when I travel and that would basically kill the device for me so I might be a bit over protective of my hobby here but it really sucks when you buy a thing and somebody else tells you how to use it.

          • @EatMyDick
            link
            English
            -191 year ago

            Only the nerds care. There is DRM on every damn platform or there except gog and nobody cares because it works fine and they aren’t the users who just want to steal.

            You hear about a shitty DRM implementation like once a year. This is all just noise from pirates.

            • Chaotic Entropy
              link
              fedilink
              English
              91 year ago

              This is such a “why does privacy matter when I have nothing to hide” argument.

              • @EatMyDick
                link
                English
                -91 year ago

                God forbid my software check that it’s not stolen!

                • Chaotic Entropy
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  71 year ago

                  Hey did you steal that? Did you steal that? Is that stolen? No don’t block my line of sight I need to see if you stole that. Did you steal that? Did you steal that?

                  What a consumer experience.

            • @scutiger
              link
              English
              61 year ago

              “Noise from pirates” is bullshit. Pirates generally tend to have a better experience with their media than legal users.

              • @EatMyDick
                link
                English
                -31 year ago

                Lolol 👌 Plex is definitely more consistent then Netflix 🙄

            • ThrowawayOnLemmy
              link
              English
              41 year ago

              They’re plenty of people who complain about it when it doesn’t work, but they don’t know why it doesn’t work, they’re just annoyed it doesn’t.

    • Corhen
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      yea, this article is intentionally rage baiting. I hate meta as much as the next guy, but 1) im shocked there wasnt any DRM for their apps already, and b) this just opens an API for apps.

      Im just not going to buy games with DRM, same as steam.

    • @MurrayL
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Yeah, but people love finding new reasons to rant about Meta (as if there weren’t enough already)

  • alphacyberranger
    link
    English
    361 year ago

    Why are all these companies hell bent on making more e-waste

    • @Saneless
      link
      English
      111 year ago

      Or, what the fuck do they think they’re protecting against?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        It’s not about protecting anything, it’s about acquiring and selling as much of your personal data as they can.

  • @cyberpunk007
    link
    English
    331 year ago

    Aaaaaaaaaand just like that, never buying a Facebook headset. Also because apparently they firmware updated to requiring a Facebook account.

    Meh.

    I’ll go valve index 2.0

  • _haha_oh_wow_
    link
    fedilink
    English
    30
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sounds pretty on-brand for them.

    Remember kids: Meta = cancer

    Do everything you can to stop meta from metastasizing.

  • @GustavoM
    link
    English
    28
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We’ve reached a point that technology is not improving, but degrading – who on earth is going to accept this as is and let third parties acquire random information about them, including their credit card? I mean, if a hacker manages to bust (whatever feature that allows this bs to happen) and forward info to them instead of the meta HQ – they are going to have a heck of a honeypot.

    • I Cast Fist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      I very much doubt even 10% of Quest owners will even bother to complain online about this.

    • @Pwnmode
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      I agree. But I worry that unfortunately this won’t stop most people.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    Welp as someone who cannot maintain a constant internet connection on my devices this is quite the turnoff

  • @harbo
    link
    English
    241 year ago

    Another reason I would never buy a Meta product

  • @FourPacketsOfPeanuts
    link
    English
    231 year ago

    I can’t imagine what kind of a bad way I’d have to be in mentally to end up buying a Meta product…