If you are gonna downvote, say something.

I can’t tell if you’re downvoting because you saw the word “blockchain”, or you really love it.

I’m using quotes in the title, because I suspect a major amount of people use the word “blockchain” loosely to refer to other related things. If you are willing to, please provide a definition of what you mean by “blockchain” as well.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    338 minutes ago

    I don’t hate it. It’s technically interesting.

    But I do see a lot of people applying it to things that really don’t need it. I think a lot of people saw Bitcoin and decided “I’m going to go make something that uses blockchains”. That’s a solution-in-search-of-a-problem, whereas you probably want to start with a problem and then look for technology that solves the problem.

    I don’t think that blockchains are a very practical solution for all that many problems.

    • @steeznson
      link
      115 minutes ago

      Yes this is pretty much my take. The technology could be really useful for something dull like ERP systems where you need to keep track of stock across global supply chains but NFTs are not a good use of them.

  • Vanth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    343 minutes ago

    A loaded question is a form of complex question that contains a controversial assumption (e.g., a presumption of guilt). Such questions may be used as a rhetorical tool: the question attempts to limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner’s agenda.

    • @NorthWestWindOP
      link
      126 minutes ago

      This is an assumption I made from observing users on Lemmy. I want to further understand their reasoning, and therefore put the assumption in the question.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    15 minutes ago

    Okay, fine, thread. But why do you have such an emotional, lose-your-shit response if you merely think it’s not a very useful technology? I’m not saying you’re wrong, but I also think there is more going on that is not acknowledged.

  • Tsiolkovsky’all
    link
    92 hours ago

    The reason I am generally skeptical of the technology is the same reason I’m not going to try to give you a definition.

    I’ve never seen it solve a problem or be proposed as a reasonable solution to a problem. What happens instead is that someone says “could we do BLOCKCHAIN for this, it’ll make it way more modern” and the subset of people that want to look really forward-leaning and cool say “YEAH”. If that subset of people is loud enough, a lot of money gets spent and a bunch of implementers have to figure out how to jam in something they can say is blockchainy… leading to a proliferation of definitions.

    The results have been universally more expensive applications with fewer helpful features. I don’t like “blockchain” because everything that touches it gets worse.

  • Count Regal Inkwell
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    27 minutes ago

    As a technology it’s nothing special, a solution looking for a problem.

    As a speculative bubble and tech industry gold rush it was outright destructive.

    Of course, unless it makes a comeback somehow, the days of blockchain as a tech industry gold rush seem to be over. Now the samesuch grifters are pushing AI (ANOTHER solution looking for a problem) where it don’t belong instead.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    144 minutes ago

    Downvoted because of the biased question. Its phrasing is presumptive (that everyone hates blockchain) rather than directed (to people who do hate blockchain).

  • @simplymath
    link
    153 minutes ago

    I think some of the downvotes are from the very biased phrasing of the question. You’ve managed to phrase it in such a way that Blockchain bros and their detractors can both respond strongly in the same direction.

    I suspect a more neural phrasing would not illicit such widespread dislike.

    • @NorthWestWindOP
      link
      124 minutes ago

      The phrasing is intentional. I do just want to see the reasons of hating it, and I think despite the downvotes, it’s working.

  • slazer2au
    link
    English
    283 hours ago

    Blockchain is touted as an immutable ledger of transactions visible to everyone.

    The only proper use case I can see for it is audit logs where you never want to loose what transaction happened. That being said, we have existing technologies which provide this at a smaller footprint.

  • Bobr
    link
    fedilink
    159 minutes ago

    I don’t hate blockchain, but I can see why other people might.

    Blockchain’s more or less only use is in cryptocurrencies (yes there are theoretically other usages, but let’s be honest it’s a drop in the ocean). The #1 cryptocurrency can do about 10TPS (please don’t even mention all the broken L2s), the #2 is “just about to revolutionize the world with smart contracts” for almost ten years already (so far the most revolutionary thing is monkey jpegs), then there are a few stable coins which aren’t even really a cryptocurrency at all, and thousands of literally memecoins.

    Real cryptocurrency (XMR and maybe BCH) can and is used as currency (I pay for lots of legal stuff like VPN/VPSs/domains with XMR), but not many people are interested in that I guess.

  • PonyOfWar
    link
    fedilink
    113 hours ago

    I don’t hate the technology itself. What I hate is the whole grifter culture surrounding it. For example there are dozens of examples of people promising some game using the blockchain, touting it as “the future of gaming” or “the metaverse”, creating a token, making millions from it and then delivering nothing, or a barely changed UE template. On the other hand, there are few if any examples of projects using a blockchain that are actually useful, at least for anything besides basic monetary transactions.

    So whenever I see a project mentioning the blockchain, the scam alarm bells go off in my head and my skepticism rises 1000x.

    • @NorthWestWindOP
      link
      -22 hours ago

      This is why I asked this question. I suspected a lot of people are just hating the economic abuse instead of the technology itself.

      Like people are downvoting because they saw the word “blockchain” (I’m guessing. Downvoters tell me why)

      • @lemming741
        link
        English
        118 minutes ago

        The only use of the technology itself, is economic abuse.

  • hendrik
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    It’s all the scams, crypto-bros and stupid, unnecessary “use-cases” that it got applied to, just to make someone a big pile of money. Also: I didn’t get rich.

    • .Donuts
      link
      82 hours ago

      It’s a solution looking for a problem

  • Max-P
    link
    fedilink
    63 hours ago

    I had to download like 60GB worth of blocks over about 2 weeks a couple months ago, just to confirm I’m indeed broke and nobody takes Zcash anymore anyway.

    The only thing it scales well at is needlessly sucking a stupid amount of power. The chains are huge and full of spam. Nobody can afford the gear to mine anymore so we’re back to the rich elites making more money.