If you are gonna downvote, say something.

I can’t tell if you’re downvoting because you saw the word “blockchain”, or you really love it.

I’m using quotes in the title, because I suspect a major amount of people use the word “blockchain” loosely to refer to other related things. If you are willing to, please provide a definition of what you mean by “blockchain” as well.

  • @Unknown1234_5
    link
    11 hour ago

    I dont trust crypto stuff bc it’s essentially gambling, and any non-crypto use is worse than just an encrypted text file.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    63 hours ago

    About 7 years ago we had some very expensive consultants, hired by clueless management, do a presentation to our marketing team.

    When that consultants declared that, “we see the future of the web centered on blockchain”, the two of us who were developers shared a mystified and slightly horrified look.

    Fortunately, the consultants went away after extracting their $200k and providing our director with some glossy reports. They did have a few useful suggestions that we implemented, but on the whole they were never mentioned again.

  • @FireTower
    link
    74 hours ago

    Don’t hate it.

    A blockchain being essentially a public ledger.

    It’s a good concept that will doubtlessly have several if not many practical uses. I think any hatred it gets is just because like every new thing hucksters try and brand it as the cure to all ills to make a buck.

  • stinerman [Ohio]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 hours ago

    I mostly hate that people don’t use an article before the term or correctly pluralize it. Saying “we want to use blockchain” is like saying “we want to build house”. You want to use a blockchain/use blockchains/use blockchain technology.

    I don’t hate the technology itself. I hate what the applications of the technology have brought us.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    85 hours ago

    I don’t hate it. It’s technically interesting.

    But I do see a lot of people applying it to things that really don’t need it. I think a lot of people saw Bitcoin and decided “I’m going to go make something that uses blockchains”. That’s a solution-in-search-of-a-problem, whereas you probably want to start with a problem and then look for technology that solves the problem.

    I don’t think that blockchains are a very practical solution for all that many problems.

    • @steeznson
      link
      44 hours ago

      Yes this is pretty much my take. The technology could be really useful for something dull like ERP systems where you need to keep track of stock across global supply chains but NFTs are not a good use of them.

  • slazer2au
    link
    English
    357 hours ago

    Blockchain is touted as an immutable ledger of transactions visible to everyone.

    The only proper use case I can see for it is audit logs where you never want to loose what transaction happened. That being said, we have existing technologies which provide this at a smaller footprint.

  • Tsiolkovsky’all
    link
    106 hours ago

    The reason I am generally skeptical of the technology is the same reason I’m not going to try to give you a definition.

    I’ve never seen it solve a problem or be proposed as a reasonable solution to a problem. What happens instead is that someone says “could we do BLOCKCHAIN for this, it’ll make it way more modern” and the subset of people that want to look really forward-leaning and cool say “YEAH”. If that subset of people is loud enough, a lot of money gets spent and a bunch of implementers have to figure out how to jam in something they can say is blockchainy… leading to a proliferation of definitions.

    The results have been universally more expensive applications with fewer helpful features. I don’t like “blockchain” because everything that touches it gets worse.

  • Vanth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    45 hours ago

    A loaded question is a form of complex question that contains a controversial assumption (e.g., a presumption of guilt). Such questions may be used as a rhetorical tool: the question attempts to limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner’s agenda.

    • @NorthWestWindOP
      link
      05 hours ago

      This is an assumption I made from observing users on Lemmy. I want to further understand their reasoning, and therefore put the assumption in the question.

  • Count Regal Inkwell
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    As a technology it’s nothing special, a solution looking for a problem.

    As a speculative bubble and tech industry gold rush it was outright destructive.

    Of course, unless it makes a comeback somehow, the days of blockchain as a tech industry gold rush seem to be over. Now the samesuch grifters are pushing AI (ANOTHER solution looking for a problem) where it don’t belong instead.

  • PonyOfWar
    link
    fedilink
    157 hours ago

    I don’t hate the technology itself. What I hate is the whole grifter culture surrounding it. For example there are dozens of examples of people promising some game using the blockchain, touting it as “the future of gaming” or “the metaverse”, creating a token, making millions from it and then delivering nothing, or a barely changed UE template. On the other hand, there are few if any examples of projects using a blockchain that are actually useful, at least for anything besides basic monetary transactions.

    So whenever I see a project mentioning the blockchain, the scam alarm bells go off in my head and my skepticism rises 1000x.

    • @NorthWestWindOP
      link
      -26 hours ago

      This is why I asked this question. I suspected a lot of people are just hating the economic abuse instead of the technology itself.

      Like people are downvoting because they saw the word “blockchain” (I’m guessing. Downvoters tell me why)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        128 minutes ago

        I don’t hate arrays and hashtables, but if a bunch of fools started hyping them as a get rich quick scheme I would reflexively start downvoting the word.

      • @lemming741
        link
        English
        24 hours ago

        The only use of the technology itself, is economic abuse.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Okay, fine, thread. But why do you have such an emotional, lose-your-shit response if you merely think it’s not a very useful technology? I’m not saying you’re wrong, but I also think there is more going on that is not acknowledged.

  • hendrik
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    It’s all the scams, crypto-bros and stupid, unnecessary “use-cases” that it got applied to, just to make someone a big pile of money. Also: I didn’t get rich.

    • .Donuts
      link
      107 hours ago

      It’s a solution looking for a problem

  • Max-P
    link
    fedilink
    77 hours ago

    I had to download like 60GB worth of blocks over about 2 weeks a couple months ago, just to confirm I’m indeed broke and nobody takes Zcash anymore anyway.

    The only thing it scales well at is needlessly sucking a stupid amount of power. The chains are huge and full of spam. Nobody can afford the gear to mine anymore so we’re back to the rich elites making more money.