• peopleproblems
    link
    English
    42 days ago

    Well, think of all the new test patients for prosthetic design and human regeneration medicine!

    I’m so sorry, it was in my head and it was one of those things that if I didn’t say I was going to explode. I am going to hell and deserve any down votes i receive.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 days ago

      It’s a morbid way of looking at it, but you’re not wrong. War has always been a big driver of medicine.

      • peopleproblems
        link
        English
        32 days ago

        There’s a lot of caveats to that. It’s almost never civilian related casualties, stabilizing traumatic injury, and increasing combatant effective hours. A soldier missing a limb can’t fight anymore, no DoD funds for him, unless troop counts are predicted to fall below sustainable amounts and you desperately need a way to keep troops effective.

        • @Paragone
          link
          English
          22 days ago

          I disagree with the “it’s almost never civilian related casualties” bit, simply because of all the mine-created amputees, throughout the world.

          That MUST drive some medical-innovation, even if it isn’t flashy.

          ( it is really sad to be arguing this, btw.

          Humankind ought get a life. )

          _ /\ _

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -12 days ago

    I can’t wait to hear an in-depth story about this from national propaganda radio. Yeah right.