• mommykink
    link
    English
    6012 days ago

    It would be really really awful if we started flooding the tip hotlines with false/conflicting information

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3912 days ago

      You can flood it with names of people whose coverage was denied and call it motive. No false information needed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1612 days ago

        Just go to any health forum, find random usernames complaining about the company and call it as a tip. Not wrong, just dumb

      • Cruxifux
        link
        fedilink
        1212 days ago

        Yeah, but I’m in another country. If I called in tips from Canada that are false is that still illegal?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1612 days ago

          Yes, the FBI would likely know that it’s coming from Canada and could get the RCMP involved.

          This is only discussing the legality and not the ethics of it though.

          • Cruxifux
            link
            fedilink
            1412 days ago

            Man why do Americas problems always have to be Canada’s problems too? Like why does the FBI have to be MY problem, that’s your guys mess. :(

            • @CarbonatedPastaSauce
              link
              English
              412 days ago

              Cause the rich in every country want the gestapo to keep everyone in line everywhere, so they make sure the fascist enforcement arms can work together easily.

              In this case you should be blaming your politicians and the RCMP, not the FBI. The FBI can’t come to your country and do shit to you without your country’s permission.

              Remember that the rich do not have patriotism, or a sense of responsibility to society or their community. They are above all that. Until we bring them back down to earth. Or under it.

              • Cruxifux
                link
                fedilink
                211 days ago

                “Bring them down to earth. Or under it.” That’s a fantastic quote. Did you think of that yourself or is that from something?

                • @CarbonatedPastaSauce
                  link
                  English
                  110 days ago

                  From the mind of yours truly. Sounded good while I was writing the post.

            • @Droggelbecher
              link
              312 days ago

              Not passing moral judgment, but if you commit a crime in a country other than yours, that country’s authorities will be after you. For a change, this isn’t the US being the US

            • Cethin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              112 days ago

              Not discussing anything else, but you’re talking about inserting yourself into the FBI’s business, so of course they’re going to insert themselves into yours too.

      • @Serinus
        link
        111 days ago

        No, really. Don’t encourage people to commit stupid crimes that could send them to prison.

        I don’t know the legality of feeding them useless, but true tips. This is your own risk.

        I absolutely do know the legality of lying to the FBI. Don’t do this. Don’t encourage people to do this.

  • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
    link
    English
    5012 days ago

    “Let’s open the closet to see how many people are celebrating this CEO getting shot, surely it can’t be that many”

    The closet in question:

    • @jaybone
      link
      712 days ago

      I always die like three seconds into that dungeon. I think there’s a spell I have to cast, or something I don’t have yet.

      • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Great use of a fireball/meteor swarm if you have it though.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4712 days ago

    “We’re not responsible, the algorithm did it.”

    We’re not responsible, the bullet did it.

    • @tburkhol
      link
      3512 days ago

      An astonishing number of people can’t distinguish “hatred based on target’s intrinsic, immutable features” from “hatred based on target’s opinions.”

    • @disguy_ovahea
      link
      1012 days ago

      It can possibly be seen as bigotry against the patients that have received denial of coverage, but even that is a stretch.

    • @ThatWeirdGuy1001
      link
      1012 days ago

      Some fuckwits would actually argue this I guarantee it.

    • Gabe BellOP
      link
      English
      812 days ago

      To be fair, the title might have been a tad more sarcastic than people might first think :)

    • @SkunkWorkz
      link
      112 days ago

      Because greedy scumbag CEOs are a minority class?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1912 days ago

    I hadn’t heard that algorithmic health care decisions had been ruled illegal. If the company were doing that, couldn’t they be considered a criminal enterprise?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2012 days ago

      Presumably they stopped doing it in those states, or it’s being appealed or something.

      Also possible they’re just ignoring a court order, I suppose, but that seems unlikely

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        412 days ago

        They definitely made an exception for those states. The same thing happened with the announcement of that Blue Cross branch that was going to stop paying for anesthesia after an arbitrary time limit. They made an exception for Connecticut because they passed a law making it illegal.

        • bizarroland
          link
          fedilink
          412 days ago

          Given how businesses work they probably didn’t stop doing it they probably just toned it down a little bit. Like instead of “deny 50% of coverage by default” they set it to like “deny 43%”.

          As long as it flies under the radar right?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1812 days ago

      Only ruled illegal in a couple of states. And no, doing some illegal things doesn’t make you (under the law) a criminal enterprise. That’s a term used for operations whose fundamental business is crime, as opposed to just employing some illegal methods in the pursuit of legal activities.

      (This is not, remotely, an argument against much, much stronger penalties for companies that do illegal shit. If the fine is less than the profit then its just a cost of doing business).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        712 days ago

        I knew it was a fantasy when I wrote it. I mean, obviously they pay more for lawyers than anything else.

        Just amazing how far they can stretch the law without it snapping back on them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 days ago

        … for operations whose fundamental business is crime

        Oh, so, insurance companies are “criminal enterpriseS”, plural. Gotcha.

    • @trolololol
      link
      2
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      You can do deeply unethical things that are legal, such as delay deny defend. If only insurance stopped there it would be a great improvement. It’s more likely they cross the line of what’s legal as long as there’s a chance of profit, even when penalties apply.

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      112 days ago

      If the company were doing that, couldn’t they be considered a criminal enterprise?