• @graycube
    link
    2127 days ago

    There could also be some extortion involved here. “Hi, I’m from the Trump administration. We are raising money for his inauguration party. If you don’t want to be embroiled in 4 years of legal battles, or have Musk buy you, you should contribute.” … " Uh, sure. Here’s a million bucks. "

    • @dirthawker0
      link
      927 days ago

      I agree that probably everyone rich is being recommended to kiss the ring, but 1M seems excessive.

      • v_krishna
        link
        fedilink
        English
        627 days ago

        It’s 0.0007% of their 2023 revenue. 0.002% of their 2023 profit. To put into realistic terms, if you made $100K it would be like giving 70 cents.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          The money would come out of profit rather than rev, so it would be more like $2.00, but your point still stands gloriously as far as I’m concerned

          Edit: there are undoubtedly tax implications that I ignored, I’m not an accountant, I just stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night

          • v_krishna
            link
            fedilink
            English
            126 days ago

            I think personal income is more akin to revenue than profit. If you bring in 100K then you pay out rent, food, expenses, etc and only profit 30K or whatever you manage to save.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              26 days ago

              Personal income is paid from corporate gross profits (unless your company is failing, in which case your profits go negative, but that is still a profit impact), just like other fees like legal fees or whatever else. The money that is spent will necessarily reduce your profit, but it does not reduce your revenue. This is explicitly a business expense for Meta though, not personal income. This impacts profitability, not revenue. It would be an expense just the same if it was paid to zuck as income, so not much changes, but the point is you were right in spirit, just not in scale, and that’s all I meant

              • v_krishna
                link
                fedilink
                English
                126 days ago

                Ahh sorry I get our misunderstanding now. I meant as an analogy, for an individual your total income is like revenue is for a company (i.e., money in, not accounting for expenses out). AFAIK the payment to Trump came from Meta not from Zuck.

      • @graycube
        link
        227 days ago

        I think shaking people, companies, and countries down for cash is the whole point of this administration. 1M should be pocket change for Meta.

  • @jenny_ball
    link
    627 days ago

    weren’t they supposed to fight?

  • @xploit
    link
    627 days ago

    Small hands think alike

  • @kraftpudding
    link
    327 days ago

    Mark’s starting to look somewhat human like. What’s up with that

  • @inclementimmigrant
    link
    224 days ago

    Why is anyone surprised? Any CEO will be sucking on Trump’s micropenis because that’s business and they’ll swallow anything anyone in power gives them of it means more profit and more money for them, personal morals be damned.

  • Skeezix
    link
    English
    126 days ago

    Did mark lube up trumps tiny pecker?