Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) lost her bid to lead Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, defeated 131-84 by Rep. Gerry Connolly in a secret caucus vote.

Reports suggest former Speaker Nancy Pelosi actively lobbied against AOC, backing Connolly by making calls and using political capital to sway votes.

Connolly, 74, cited his experience and record as decisive factors in his victory, despite progressive disappointment over AOC’s loss.

Supporters viewed AOC’s bid as a chance to revitalize Democratic strategy, calling the outcome a missed opportunity for the party.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    203 hours ago

    74? Man, I’m so tired of these old fucks… Except Bernie. That guy actually represents his constituents.

  • @EnderMB
    link
    133 hours ago

    Surely at this point AOC is going to be in the conversation to run for president in four years. She might not be the frontrunner, but she’s a notable Democrat with a great record.

    The best thing to do would be to have them on-side, and working towards a common goal. By alienating her, that battle for her to get the nomination is going to just be more painful. Her platform will be more progressive, because she’ll be stuck in her convictions through being isolated by her party. Her attitude to the old guard will be less about protecting them for their service, and more to do with getting dead wood out.

    IMO, anyone that values a progressive platform should back AOC for president right now. Set the wheels in motion, push for stuff you’d think you’d never get, like disarming America, huge tax increases on those earning $1m+, and providing free healthcare.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      11 hour ago

      IMO, anyone that values a progressive platform should back AOC for president right now.

      So less than 10% of the senate.

      • @Maggoty
        link
        124 hours ago

        No, they have a thing about not giving power to young people. Everyone has to wait their turn which means not getting leadership positions until you’re at least 70.

          • @Wilzax
            link
            94 hours ago

            He also runs as independent, specifically because the Democratic party pulls this shit

  • @BigBenis
    link
    716 hours ago

    It’s great to see the Democrats have learned absolutely nothing and continue to refuse to evolve.

    • Dr. Moose
      link
      English
      24
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Why would they? American 2 party system just means they have infinite job security, funding and no reason to adapt. So you can either choose flawed Democrats or literal idiots. What will you do?

      I genuinely confused how people expect things to be different here. I’m not an American so maybe I’m missing something, but this genuinely seems a system design flaw rather than anything else.

      • @BigBenis
        link
        24 hours ago

        Oh there are many of us across the political spectrum that are aware of how our two party system fails us. For the record, I don’t expect things to be different but in light of how bad things are it’s hard not to get my hopes up especially when there’s a good chance at meaningful change.

        Many of us are becoming further and further disillusioned with our political system. However, things are changing slowly. Municipalities are introducing ranked choice voting systems and there are efforts to expand that to the state level. Maybe someday we’ll put this mess behind us.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 hours ago

          A bunch of (5 states) ranked choice voting ballot measures were just rejected directly by citizens, and another went so far as to ban it, and many red states have already done that. Team money won by convincing the public to vote against their own interests. Sorry to bear bad news, maybe there’s something else to be hopeful about still but I’m not seeing it. The only good news I’ve heard in American politics since the election was within the last few weeks, and it gets you banned on most of the Internet for saying so.

    • Sylveon
      link
      fedilink
      75 hours ago

      I don’t think they’re ignorant, they’d just rather support the fascists than the progressives.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      It’s not their fault they keep loosing, it’s the voters who are too dumb to understand that Democrats are marginally better than fascists. /s

  • Tiefling IRL
    link
    fedilink
    80
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Isn’t Pelosi supposed to be in an ER with a fractured ego or some shit?

    • ALQ
      link
      347 hours ago

      I’m just sitting here hoping her recovery is as pleasant as she is.

    • @WhatAmLemmy
      link
      English
      43
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      The oligarchs want fascism. What more could a sociopath capitalist want than a fusion of their corporations and the state; a state sanctioned too-big-to-fail monopoly that is protected and enforced by the military, with socialized losses, yet privatized profits?

      Competition is for chumps, and nothing more than a self serving virtue signal they will abandon for higher profits; like all the other virtues they never possessed.

  • @BMTea
    link
    2
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    deleted by creator

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -57 hours ago

    They’re seriously using the word “schemes”? This is like one of those “I am Firm; You are Obstinate; He is a Pig-headed Fool" jokes.