• @f314
      link
      English
      29
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Just checked App Store:

      Connected to you

      • Contact Info
      • User Content
      • Identifiers

      Not connected to you

      • Diagnostics
    • @ramenshaman
      link
      English
      91 day ago

      I haven’t been asked to give any weird permissions, I just needed an email address and password to sign up. I never used twitter or anything similar other than instagram but I gotta say I’m not too excited about bluesky so far. I signed up when I found out Elon was mad because people were leaving twitter for bluesky. I enjoy seeing Mark Hamill’s and George Takei’s posts, and the most recent JWST pics are awesome, but overall I’m not a big fan. Maybe the way I set it up is suboptimal? Idk, I probably already have enough things sucking away my time and attention.

      • qyron
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        So many questions in my mind…

        If:

        • Shit

        As in literal shit, no, and lets try to keep it that way.

        • Shit

        As nohing of quality, that is absent everywhere. Go read a book, you’re better off. Support an online archive while you are at it. Save ebooks and other cultural media in an offline support and share ot with others

        • Shit

        As an indication of quantity, I disagree. There is plenty of shit to scroll through and pilling higher every second.

        • Shit

        As in all of the above… where can you even find that?

        • OpenStars
          link
          fedilink
          English
          223 hours ago

          Tbf, Reddit does have an infinite shit generator, so long as you are okay with bot reposts.

            • OpenStars
              link
              fedilink
              English
              117 hours ago

              I like [email protected] and the newly created [email protected], both often feature OC - not exclusively but being kinda known for a preference and offering of such. Maybe [email protected] too, but it’s far less active.

              But if people want to offer content, they will. Except often the environment is not welcoming, so it’s a bit of a cache-22 needing solid moderation first, but needing solid content even first-er, which leads to super power mods who know how having to do most of the mod work.

              It’s not easy, but we do seem to be growing, even as it looks like from the count of actual people we’re probably shrinking just a tiny bit, though those here are more active. Mostly in comments rather than posts.

          • qyron
            link
            fedilink
            English
            123 hours ago

            I reviewed my comment. Now you can have a sound laugh at my expense.

            • OpenStars
              link
              fedilink
              English
              222 hours ago

              That’s a lot of shit!

              Wait, are we shitting now on shit? Or just shooting the shit?

              img

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Thats what lemmy exists for… Not every platform needs voting. For microblogs, which usually represent and individual person, having voting would be a horrible idea because it would allow for brigading of small peoples platforms. With a few hundred people you could make sure that specific accounts or groups of people never reach “top”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          115 hours ago

          You can, but its not a platform built around individuals, so its harder or just less impactful to bully individuals. If you try to brigade a community, then you are immediately up against everyone that likes that community so its just a system thats more resistant to bullshit.

          • lurch (he/him)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -123 hours ago

            but that doesn’t help the next person. plus a downvote is good feedback, so we know what we wrote is considered unworthy or unhelpful by others whatever their reasons might be

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              This has been studied.

              A study found that users who receive negative feedback on their posts tend to contribute more frequently, but their subsequent contributions are often of lower quality.

              Additionally, there were concerns raised about how downvotes negatively affect new users (who aren’t aware of a community’s norms, and so are more likely to collect downvotes), and how downvotes stifle diverse viewpoints, helping to create an echo chamber (the so-called “reddit hivemind”).

              It contributes to a more toxic environment:

              Receiving downvotes can negatively affect a user’s self-esteem and confidence. Users may experience feelings of rejection or inadequacy when their posts are downvoted. This can lead to decreased participation or self-censorship to avoid future negative feedback.

              Frequent downvoting may contribute to increased stress and anxiety for some users. The fear of being judged harshly by peers can create a hostile online environment.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6
              edit-2
              22 hours ago

              Thats just not what microblogging is for. Its not a forum, its a blog. If you dont think its worth seeing just dont follow, like or reblog it. If you want a prechewed version of reality then use a feed to only view things from people you like.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              219 hours ago

              There are moderation lists which honestly work better than a downvote when it comes to isolate assholes