If Honda and Nissan can’t survive at their size, well Subaru and Mazda are tiny by comparison.

  • @Anticorp
    link
    English
    321 month ago

    I doubt the merger has anything to do with survival and everything to do with consolidating power and profit.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      51 month ago

      Subaru’s are doing fine and owners love them. Sure they ain’t big but they got a profitable business with a good brand name.

    • @someguy3OP
      link
      18
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Huh.

      Toyota Motors bought a little over 40% of GM’s former FHI stock, amounting to 8.7% of FHI. (The rest of GM’s shares went to a Fuji stock buy-back program.)[17]

      FHI being Fuji Heavy Industry, which is now Subaru Corporation.

      *Subaru Corporation:

      Owners

      Toyota (20.42%)

      The Master Trust Bank of Japan investment trusts (14.15%)

      Custody Bank of Japan investment trusts (5.28%)

      State Street Bank West Client - Treaty 505234 (1.56%)

      (as of September 30, 2024)[3]

      • @NegativeLookBehind
        link
        English
        91 month ago

        Nissan made some absolutely terrible design decisions, namely the wide use of CVTs. I think this has contributed to their downfall. I imagine Subaru and Mazda will be OK.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          71 month ago

          To be fair, Nissan CVTs end up being garbage because their fluid change interval is like 100K miles when it should be 30K miles. Change that fluid on the regular, and it’ll be fine.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 month ago

            The problem is people see Nissans CVTs being shit and just assume all CVTs are shit. Really Nissan just chooses to make shit CVTs and their brand suffers because of it.

            Subaru puts CVTs in their cars and they’re largely fine. They naturally had some teething issues initially but coincidentally that was with the torque converter side of things and not the CV side.

            • @czardestructo
              link
              21 month ago

              60k miles on my Subaru CVT and I beat the absolute shit out of it. I’ve towed at least 10 cords of wood with it and regularly pull a 12’ enclosured trailer with it. I’m constantly pushing its limits and thus far its managed fine.

  • @Rajtinka
    link
    21 month ago

    I thought the point was to combine so that they could compete with Chinese EV’s? To better move forward with hybrid and EV vehicles as the world transitions away from ICEs? I think it’s crazy that even combined they still sell a fraction of what Toyota sells and still only puts them at #3 behind VW. I only recently learned it’s so lopsided.

    • @someguy3OP
      link
      21 month ago

      Thus the question how Subaru and Mazda won’t get curbstomped when they are so much smaller.

      • @Rajtinka
        link
        11 month ago

        Since it appears Toyota has an interest in Subaru and Subaru has insane brand loyalty, they should be fine. Toyota could take a more direct role through sharing technology if it would help. I don’t know much about Mazda other than they are still made in Japan and I love my CX5. I certainly hope there is room for the smaller, high quality brands. I would be concerned about any manufacturer that hasn’t made progress on hybrid and EV tech though. I hear those Chinese kids make some pretty inexpensive options.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 month ago

    It’s not that they can’t survive because of their size, it’s that they can’t survive with the crappy products they’ve been putting out lately and their costs. From what I’ve seen Subaru still has a decent profit margin, so it doesn’t matter that they’re smaller.