Summary

Health insurance companies are increasingly denying cancer treatments and screenings recommended by physicians, leading to delays and potential harm for patients.

These denials, often based on internal rules lacking transparency, can result in serious adverse events, disease progression, and even death.

While prior authorization is intended to save money, physicians argue that the current system is inefficient and detrimental to patient care.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1710 hours ago

    What Luigi allegedly did was justified.

    I will not mourn the death of the decision makers in healthcare that lead to these outcomes, nor the passing of the politicians that refuse to use the law to change this system.

    I hope they all fucking die alone and removed from everything they’ve ever loved.

    • @chiliedogg
      link
      810 hours ago

      Peaceful protest should be seen as the opening bid. When it’s ignored or repressed, people escalate.

      The fact that almost nobody is upset over a CEO’s assassination is terrifying to those in power. And that’s why they’re trying to fast-track a death-penalty case against him. If the momentum.of support for what he did continues, they won’t be safe ever.

  • @ArtVandelay
    link
    English
    810 hours ago

    “But they can’t go, and many would rather die”

    “Then perhaps they should do so, and decrease the Surplus population”

    Healthcare corporate fucksticks out here acting like Ebenezer Scrooge

  • TheTechnician27
    link
    English
    85
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Even prompting enough attention for this single investigation would make what Luigi did justified. Rot in piss, Brian.

  • @FlowVoid
    link
    English
    5918 hours ago

    Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois, Pike’s health insurer through his employer, had declined to cover the roughly $40,000 treatment.

    Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois is a nonprofit, so it turns out nonprofits deny care too.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      6218 hours ago

      There’s no such thing as “nonprofit” insurance in a for-profit healthcare system. If they aren’t making money for themselves, they’ve been created to make money for everyone else.

      • Nougat
        link
        fedilink
        1816 hours ago

        The difference between a for profit and a non profit is just in the way they do accounting for where the money goes.

        • @FlowVoid
          link
          English
          1016 hours ago

          The bigger difference is that NPOs don’t have shareholders who demand profits.

      • @FlowVoid
        link
        English
        6
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        The hospital in this story, MD Anderson, is also a nonprofit. In fact it’s part of the University of Texas, a state-run school. So nobody profited from what happened here.

        And in general, insurance companies have an antagonistic relationship with health care providers. Because when insurance companies deny care, health care providers lose money.

    • HubertManne
      link
      fedilink
      1617 hours ago

      oh yeah. been on blue cross most of my life. Its like you see with so many things now. Denial is standard to see if they can shake out anyone who won’t go through the appeals process. The more expensive the more they fight the appeals and repeat the denials. If you fight and live long enough you might get the needed care.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    3918 hours ago

    Still struggling to adapt to life without her husband, Angela said: “I cannot help but go back to that month in Texas — what would have happened if he had had that surgery? Would he have lived?”

    Well he sure as fuck didn’t without it, and that’s the problem.