Summary

Danish King Frederik has redesigned the royal coat of arms to prominently feature symbols of Greenland and the Faroe Islands, replacing the historical three crowns, in an apparent rebuke to Donald Trump’s renewed interest in buying Greenland.

The change underscores Denmark’s commitment to maintaining its territorial integrity.

Greenland’s Prime Minister Múte Egede firmly rejected Trump’s suggestion, declaring, “Greenland is ours.”

This marks the fourth revision of Denmark’s coat of arms since 1819 and highlights Greenland’s century-long political and cultural ties to Denmark despite U.S. military presence on the island.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    791 month ago

    I sure wish I lived in a country that had the balls to tell Trump where to shove it rather than where I currently live, which is bending over backwards to elect a Trump clone who will willingly bend over at the first opportunity.

    • MightyCuriosity
      link
      fedilink
      English
      441 month ago

      The worrying part is that no one has any idea what country you’re from

  • @FelixCress
    link
    English
    471 month ago

    Good, Trump can go and fuck himself.

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      51 month ago

      They shouldn’t validate his idiocy by even responding to it.

      • @FelixCress
        link
        English
        181 month ago

        I don’t know. It is getting more dangerous every day.

        • @AbidanYre
          link
          English
          21 month ago

          He’s not a threat to Denmark or Greenland and responding to it only encourages him.

          • @FelixCress
            link
            English
            41 month ago

            He’s not a threat to Denmark or Greenland

            How do you know that, exactly?

          • @FelixCress
            link
            English
            11 month ago

            https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gzn48jwz2o

            Asked on Tuesday if he would rule out using military or economic force in order to take over the autonomous Danish territory or the Canal, he responded: "No, I can’t assure you on either of those two.

            Trump is as dangerous as Hitler, stop deluding yourself.

            • @AbidanYre
              link
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Jesus Christ, you’re worried about an actual war with Denmark and you think I’m the delusional one?

              Trump is stupid and lazy, he’ll forget about Greenland by the end of whatever Fox News segment he’s currently watching.

              There’s plenty to be worried about looking at the next four years, but this doesn’t even make the top 500.

              • @FelixCress
                link
                English
                3
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                you’re worried about an actual war with Denmark

                Yes, you idiot. And so should everyone.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 month ago

    My first thought was that it’s very entertaining to see far right people clashing. Denmark is heavily infested with right wing politics as well.

    My second thought was that last time the whole world decided to go right wing we got 2 world wars.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 month ago

      This will unite the left and right in Denmark. And Denmark is probably the most left-wing country in the world, if you look at economic policy (maybe Norway beats them).

      However, one should not forget that Denmark-Greenland is a real colonial problem, and Greenland deserves independence.

      Still, I side with Denmark in this conflict. They should not be bullied into anything by US fascists that for sure will be even worse colonial overlords.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        https://jacobin.com/2021/02/denmark-zero-asylum-immigration-refugees

        After Denmark’s Social Democrats returned to office in 2019, backed by the left-wing parties, some hoped for an end to the previous right-wing government’s extreme anti-migrant measures. The outgoing administration had introduced an infamous “jewelry law,” forcing immigrants to give up valuables when applying for asylum, and a “ghetto plan” making it possible to force immigrants out of their homes. Yet, such hopes of change were quickly foiled. The incoming government enthusiastically maintained and even bolstered migration policies that were once the preserve of the far right. And in recent weeks, the ruling Social Democratic Party has sunk to new lows. In an interview at the end of January, integration and immigration minister Mattias Tesfaye announced the aim for Denmark to accept “zero” asylum seekers. The following day, prime minister Mette Fredriksen clarified Tesfaye’s statement by confirming this stance: “We cannot make a promise of having zero asylum seekers, but we definitely can put forward such a vision.”

        Denmark is at the forefront of normalizing right wing ideas in general, and racism and Islamophobia in particular.

        They are most certainly not the most left-wing country in the world.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            Might be true if you’re white and not Muslim. It’s not mutually exclusive to be nationalistic and socialist at the same time if you think about it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Probably true even if you’re a Muslim.

              Anyway, the one dimensional political scale is useless (though for western alt-right movements it’s been quite useful). And most socialist movements have been nationalistic and internationalistic. If a country has to provide welfare to all citizens of the world, to be considered left-wing, well do you know of any such example?

              The german national socialists, which you might be referring to, were not very left-wing on economic policy. At least not after 1934. Both the national socialists and the danish social democrats advocate some form of corporatism, but the Danish social democratic version is much more social leaning and labor unions are independent and relatively powerful.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        English
        21 month ago

        I don’t know that it technically is a colonial problem because the Inuit came to Greenland after the Vikings had already settled it (it was unsettled before the Vikings), but then Denmark came back after the Vikings had abandoned Greenland and re-claimed it.

        The Inuit and the Vikings settled different parts of Greenland, but were close enough that they could see each other across the fjords. There isn’t much evidence for direct contact, probably because the devoutly Christian Vikings did not care for the animist Inuit.

        All that aside, I do agree that they deserve independence if they want it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          Maybe imperialist is a better word. I’m not sure if the definition of “colonial” require that the subject population was there first.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            English
            21 month ago

            I would say imperialist works better here. And I would agree with you about colonial as a use-phrase in general, but this is a special case where the Danes were there first and then they left and then came back. So it’s hard to call that colonial in this specific case.

    • @Wogi
      link
      English
      61 month ago

      Heyyyy then we got mild socialism that kinda worked until a conservative court overturned all of the most effective reforms in favor of business…

    • lime!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 month ago

      very thin article, that. there is a danish law since 2009 that states that greenland will be granted independence if they ask for it. the polls suggest that people only want independence if it comes with no lowering of living standards (78% against in that case, from 2016).

      so basically if a referendum comes in positive, denmark lets them go. they already transferred much of the local governance to the locals in 2009.

  • Not a replicant
    link
    English
    241 month ago

    That’s far too subtle to even register on Trump’s feeble brain cell.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 month ago

      I think this is for the Greenlanders. It’s to make them feel acknowledged by the Danish and their monarch as an integral and equal part of their country.

    • @Wogi
      link
      English
      101 month ago

      Trump thinks a coat of arms is a jacket made of weapons that he can buy

    • @eronth
      link
      English
      81 month ago

      Bruh a literal full coat of arms change wouldn’t register to him. He’s dumb as fuck.

    • @dejected_warp_core
      link
      English
      61 month ago

      Honestly, I just want to know who fed him this Greenland nonsense in the first place. I don’t think it’s his idea, originally.

  • Wowbagger
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 month ago

    This is not related to anything the US has been doing. It has been underway some time.

  • Caveman
    link
    English
    181 month ago

    Now we can all wait for Musk to say how Denmark needs to be overthrown by fascists

  • @AbouBenAdhem
    link
    English
    9
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    In his first speech of 2025, King Frederik said: “We are all united and each of us committed for the kingdom of Denmark. From the Danish minority in South Schleswig – which is even situated outside the kingdom – and all the way to Greenland. We belong together.”

    Ok, so he rejected US interest in Danish territory… while simultaneously asserting Danish interest in part of Germany?

    • @GojuRyu
      link
      English
      111 month ago

      The South Schleswig Danish minority have been mentioned in every new year’s speech I can remember. It’s basically part of acknowledging everyone who feels ties to the kingdom of Denmark. Near the german border there is a danish minority in Germany and a german minority in Denmark. And to my understanding as someone not living near there it is a respected cultural thing on both sides. It is not something about laying claim to it. In this particular speech the very next sentence is about the king and queen feeling just what you quoted during their visit those places that year and how they are looking forward to visiting the Faroese islands. For context the king was crowned in 2024 so this was commentary on the first royal visit of the new reagents.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        And to my understanding as someone not living near there it is a respected cultural thing on both sides. It is not something about laying claim to it.

        We stand with our Jutish brothers against the oppressive dictate of Rigsdansk, forcing people to put their articles on the wrong side of their nouns. Sjaellish devils, go back to Skane!

    • Roflmasterbigpimp
      link
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Not exactly; The Danish minority in Schleswig-Holstein is a recognized political group within Germany. Their party, the ‘Südschleswigsche Wählerverband (SSW)’ (South Schleswig Voter Federation), is even exempt from the 5% rule.

      So I read it more like he recognized these “exiles” as Danish, which they are.

      • @Noobnarski
        link
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Correct, what is funny is that the danish government is building stupid fences and had way too strict rules about crossing the border when Covid first hit, so they were the ones causing problems to people living in the border area.

        As long as the Danish government isn’t playing up again there is no check on the border or anything, so it’s not a big problem if you live across the border from everything else you go to everyday.

        • Roflmasterbigpimp
          link
          English
          41 month ago

          there is no check on the border or anything, so it’s not a big problem if you live across the border from everything else you go to everyday.

          And that’s one of my favourite things about the EU/Schengen-Area 🇪🇺

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Frederik: The Kalmar Union is dead, long live Greenland!

    Kalaallit Nunaat: Isn’t it a bit late for colonial wars? Can West-Britain and Southern Norway argue this out somewhere else?

    US President Elect: What’s final price? Can you do better than that?