Summary

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon temporarily blocked the release of special counsel Jack Smith’s report on Donald Trump’s criminal cases.

The injunction will last until three days after the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rules on a related case involving Trump co-defendants Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira.

Nauta and De Oliveira argue that releasing the report could jeopardize their right to a fair trial.

Cannon, who previously ruled Smith’s appointment unconstitutional, issued the order to “preserve the status quo” pending appellate decisions.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1451 day ago

    “Judge aiming to be ranked as most corrupt judge in history, helps Trump AGAIN.

    I fucking hate how obvious this outcome was going to be.

    • @Glytch
      link
      519 hours ago

      She’s gotta step it up if she’s wants to top Clarence Thomas.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1091 day ago

    Aileen Cannon is a horrible person and should be tried for judicial interference if ever America returns to sanity.

      • @9point6
        link
        351 day ago

        This was my first reaction: someone wants the next slot that opens up

        Good luck America, enjoy the most egregious cronyism the world has ever seen. It’d be entertaining from an outside perspective if it wasn’t likely to fuck the whole world up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 day ago

        Anymore is the SCROTUM. Supreme Court Of The United Millionaires

        Cause sure as hell they don’t make any decisions that benefit someone not already a millionaire

    • @Raiderkev
      link
      218 hours ago

      Or just get to spend some Luigi time in Mario Party.

    • @Allonzee
      link
      3
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      if ever America returns to sanity.

      That’s a big ask, hasn’t been a hint of sanity since Carter.

      We’ve all been soon to be millionaires ever since!

  • @chrischryse
    link
    1922 hours ago

    I’m really confused how can one judge stop this

    • Makhno
      link
      319 hours ago

      Cause we live in a dystopian hellscape, that’s why.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    73
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    So she has no legal authority because she dismissed the case, which returned direction to the 11th circuit.

    Can anyone with legal education explain to me why we’re even giving deference to someone who has no authority over the case?

    It seems like letting this fly is just giving them more ammunition to lie and twist the system with impunity to where the rules simply don’t matter.

    • themeatbridge
      link
      531 day ago

      Because we don’t have a functioning justice system? Oligarchs run our country, corruption is the currency of power, and the public at large has been duped into thinking we are free.

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 day ago

        Yeah that’s not a legal opinion as to why this is being allowed. I understand that much already and I’m looking for actual details here. I know folks think such things don’t matter so much anymore, but I do.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          171 day ago

          But it is the correct answer. There’s no reason for her to be given any deference on this. The 11th district court has the ability to overrule this judgement at literally any time, and I hope they will. The only reason this works is because rule of law in the U.S. is collapsing.

        • themeatbridge
          link
          121 day ago

          You will find no satisfactory answers. The oligarchy has abandoned the pretense of the rule of law. It’s a scary time to be alive.

          • Snot Flickerman
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I know it won’t be satisfactory, but I’m still looking for someone who understands how these legal mechanisms are supposed to work to talk me through it. I simply don’t have the legal education to be making a more informed statement, and clearly neither does anyone else here.

            While it’s easy to shout “Oligarchy!” the details still fucking matter.

            • @leadore
              link
              2
              edit-2
              18 hours ago

              Basically their goal is to delay the release until Jan. 20th (inauguration), when Trump’s DOJ will bury it for him. The legal system is chock full of ways to delay things, just ask for a ruling on something and BAM, automatic delay. So they filed a motion asking the release to be delayed until the federal appeals court in Atlanta makes a decision on what will happen to Trump’s two co-defendants:

              That court is considering whether to resurrect the classified documents case against Trump’s two co-defendants, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira. They argued in legal motions Monday and Tuesday that releasing Smith’s report could unfairly prejudice them if they are ever brought to trial. Trump tacked onto their request, arguing that releasing the report is not in the public interest and that the negative attention it would receive could impede his presidency.

              source

              • Snot Flickerman
                link
                fedilink
                English
                218 hours ago

                Thanks so much, this is exactly the kind of information I was looking for. This still sucks but it at least makes more sense.

              • Snot Flickerman
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Ok and I personally think that attitude is gonna help Republicans memory hole how things actually worked in the past by throwing up your hands and giving up instead of trying to find out details.

                But you do you man, I’m still gonna at least try to find out things, even if the only thing it helps is having one more person remember how systems were supposed to function and continues talking about it to others.

                • themeatbridge
                  link
                  722 hours ago

                  I hear you, and I understand where you’re coming from. But there literally isn’t a legal argument for any of it. The SCOTUS has been corrupted and has invalidated their own credibility, and corrupt judges and politicians have been handing down legally indefensible rulings for years. Their justification is “fuck you. What are you gonna do about it?”

                  Legal systems must be consistent to be valid. Selective application of legal reasoning has exposed our courts to malfeasance. It is rotten at the core, and any justice handed down is unintended coincidence.

                • skulblaka
                  link
                  fedilink
                  91 day ago

                  The reason is that many people are not doing their jobs. Cut and dry end of story.

                  I both understand and empathize with your search for meaning here, but that is the meaning.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 day ago

      Her opinion ties this report to the exercise of special counsel authority that she has (absolutely corruptly and incorrectly) deemed unconstitutional when she dismissed the case prior to appeal.

      Therefore, Trump’s lawyers filed a motion, presumably claiming that Cannon’s dismissal order was being violated by the exercise of special counsel authority in preparing the report, which at least on the surface gives Cannon authority to enforce her ruling with an injunction (pending 11th Circuit review, which frankly cannot come soon enough).

      That’s my sanewash/lawfare-approved explanation.

  • @credo
    link
    331 day ago

    Nobody needs to pardon anyone. Biden should just release it himself because he has full immunity.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      520 hours ago

      No way!

      The democrats will be taking 98 year old Donald Trump out on the campaign trail in 20 years, so they don’t want to burn any bridges.

      • Makhno
        link
        318 hours ago

        Woah, you sure Elon will be cool with that once he’s running the DNC?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -118 hours ago

      Biden is senile, he is just another puppet owned by the same wall street military and prison industry profiteers that support trump. The dnc and rnc are funded and beholden to the same financial interests. America hasnt been a true democracy probably since FDR died. If not then it was soon after that point.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1020 hours ago

    side note buried under a load of manure here is that he’s giving away orders to the amount of 20 billion dollars to middle eastern companies to build data centers in the usa. so much for america first.

  • @GraniteM
    link
    301 day ago

    Jesus fucking Christ, Cannon again.

  • @DrFistington
    link
    301 day ago

    Yeah, it’s not going to look good for her or Trump when the evidence is released that his campaign directly paid for travel and lodging for groups of people that assaulted the Capitol

    • @krashmo
      link
      1321 hours ago

      Do you honestly believe that there is anything that could be written in that report that would make a difference? I don’t even mean something plausible. I mean literally anything. Because I don’t. It could say that Trump invented time travel and used it exclusively to help Hitler kill more Jews and nothing meaningful would happen. That has been proven over and over again and yet we’re still constantly hearing “yeah but this time it will be taken seriously”.

      • @DrFistington
        link
        120 hours ago

        It wouldn’t make a difference to Trump supporters, but drawing a clear financial support line between him and the insurrectionist would prove treason. At that point the military could step in, or really anyone that’s taken the oath of service, and they would be justified

  • @schteph
    link
    341 day ago

    If they have any balls left, they’d just release it anyway and have Biden pardon them.

    I don’t think they’ll do it, but they should.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      171 day ago

      They should have leaked it before the election, then gone on TV and pledged to find the leaker. Republicans do it all the time.

    • @Xanthobilly
      link
      1
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Have you not been following? Every single decision the judicial branch and DOJ has made has protected Trump. Democrats are feckless and dance for the same masters.

  • @leadore
    link
    318 hours ago

    Next U.S. District Judge Supreme Court Justice Aileen Cannon temporarily blocked the release …

    FTFY

  • Monkey With A Shell
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 day ago

    Would be a shame of Jack where to retain a copy of the report without permission, just in case the DOJ misplaced it in the next few years.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 day ago

      She technically doesn’t even have authority so I’d really like someone with legal background explaining why anyone is giving her deference on this issue.

      So now like any Federal judge can just block anything that’s not in their court, anytime they want now? Things have been bad for a while, but this is just in our faces bad.