• Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    561 month ago

    One of the reasons American English uses -er spellings (center, theater) where British English uses -re spellings (centre, theatre) is because of an early American desire to “de-Britishify” after gaining independence. Noah Webster had much to do with this, and changed many other spellings from British English to a newly forming American English.

    • Swordgeek
      link
      fedilink
      61 month ago

      I wonder if Webster’s “anti-British” sentiment was (part of) the instigation of “American uniquism.”

      To this day, whatever the world does, the US does it differently, almost as a knee-jerk reaction.

      • Nougat
        link
        fedilink
        41 month ago

        Also consider that a whole lot of the world was “British” when the US broke away.

        • Swordgeek
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          Still is. The real distinction is between American English and the rest of the English-speaking world.

          Or for non-language issues…

          American units vs. metric, used by almost every other country on the planet.

          American rules for a given sport vs. every other country on the planet.

          American WHATEVER vs. every other fucking country on planet earth.

    • @shalafi
      link
      English
      51 month ago

      Colourful reply!

  • pruwyben
    link
    fedilink
    211 month ago

    I say we just admit that R can be a vowel, and drop the E entirely.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 month ago

      Blew my mind when I learned that the Chinese i frequently works like that and that pinyin is a lie.

    • @sznowicki
      link
      61 month ago

      That’s what we did in Polish. It’s „metr”.

          • Rikudou_Sage
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Only three? Pff. Our favourite sentence to torture foreigners (and small kids learning to talk) is “strč prst skrz krk” which means “put a finger through your throat”.

            You can try it yourself, the “č” sound is the same as English “cz” in “Czech”.

  • @idiomaddict
    link
    121 month ago

    There were already multiple patterns for words ending in “er” (both the doer words, like runner, and a series of words like butter, feather, sister), so it could be a conflation, but I think it’s more likely that it’s just a simplification. British has “er” and “re” endings for meter, depending on whether it’s a verb or a noun, and Americans just spell both “er” for simplicity’s sake.

  • @db2
    link
    61 month ago

    Because only an idiot pronounces it like “possabell”.

    • oce 🐆OP
      link
      fedilink
      51 month ago

      The point is to better match the current pronunciation bəl, not change the pronunciation.

      • @marron12
        link
        111 month ago

        You can think of “le” as a way of showing that it’s a syllabic L. Meaning that you say a dark L, and there isn’t really a vowel before it. The L takes up the whole syllable. It can sound like there’s a schwa in there (usually just a blip of one), but that’s just part of how you say the dark L. It comes from having the back part of your tongue press down and back.

        This happens at the end of a word when the L is in an unstressed syllable. The spelling can vary a little. For example:

        • people
        • simple
        • model
        • oval

        There isn’t really a reason why the spelling is different. That’s just how it happened to develop.

        The pronunciation can vary a little too. If you hold the L longer, or emphasize the syllable more, it can sound more like a proper vowel is in there. But your tongue stays a tiny bit lower than it does for the schwa sounds.

        • oce 🐆OP
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          That’s the most convincing explanation I have read, thank you!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          | There isn’t really a reason why the spelling is different. That’s just how it happened to develop.

          There absolutely is a reason for each of your examples, and again, it comes from French : peuple simple modèle ovale

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -21 month ago

        Go ask your teachers why they taught you the wrong pronunciation; and why they didn’t equip you to hear the correct one and adapt.

        #noChildLeftBehind?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    “Meter” isn’t a French word (it’s “mètre”) and “metre” isn’t an American English word for “mètre”. And neither “meter” nor “metre” are pronounced like “mètre”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I think it wasn’t the point of OP that “meter” better matches the French pronunciation, but it does better match the (American and British?) English pronouciation than “metre” does.

    • oce 🐆OP
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I am French, I know that. Let me expend the title to make it easier to understand.

      In American English, words of French origin like “meter” (American English) inverted the last letters of “metre” (British English from French “mètre”) to better match the English pronunciation. Why isn’t it also the case for other similar situations like “possible”?

      • @Fondots
        link
        71 month ago

        If we inverted the last letters of “possible” to “possibel,” that wouldn’t really match how we pronounce it

        I’d probably try to read it as something like “possi-bell”

        But our actual pronunciation is more along the lines of “possi-bull” not exactly, and I feel like different dialects might maybe lean more towards the last syllable being more like bill, ball, or boll, but I can’t really imagine any dialect where the pronunciation would match a “bel” spelling.

        It’s sort of an unintentional half vowel sound that just happens after making the “b” noise, and not really something we’re intentionally trying to put into the word.

        Linguists probably have some specific terminology for it, but I’m no linguist.

        • palordrolap
          link
          fedilink
          51 month ago

          The vowel you’re talking about is “ə”, also known as “schwa”. It’s probably the most common vowel sound in all varieties of English - in defiance of spelling - but it occurs in lots of languages. (German often uses it as the sound for final e, and French still retains it in some words and dialects for the same thing too.)

          As to how common it is in English:

          “Thə vowəl yo~ə’re talking əbout is “ə” also known as “schwa”. It’s probəbly thə most commən vowəl sound in all variəties of English.”

          In some varieties ə moves closer to ʌ, a similar sound that’s a little further back in the mouth. Links go to Wikipedia where there are sound files to listen to.

          • @idiomaddict
            link
            61 month ago

            It’s actually a syllabic L, which is often spelled out as a schwa in pronunciation dictionaries.

            If you speak German, an equivalent would be the -en on most unconjugated verbs. Haben is pronounced with a syllabic n (or m, depending on your accent), for example.

            The difference is basically in length. A syllabic consonant is shorter than even a short vowel sound, and which vowel it uses depends on the language. It’s a schwa in English because that’s basically our default vowel, as you pointed out, but not every language uses a schwa as the syllabic consonant carrier: Serbo-Croatian uses [u].

          • @Fondots
            link
            21 month ago

            I don’t think it’s really a schwa, at least not the way I say it

            A schwa kind of comes from the back of your mouth like you’re saying “uhh…”

            When I say possible, that last sound feels more like it’s the little burst of air from the b sort of fading into the l sound

            Then again I’m no linguist so I could be out of my depth trying to really describe the noises I’m making, and I’m not very well-equipped to separate how I talk from more general American English (I’m from Philly, and we have more than our share of little linguistic quirks, after all, we pronounce “water” as “wooder”)

    • @seven_phone
      link
      -11 month ago

      Töo muçh “spec’ial” char{act}ér.