Side note: Does anybody have an effective way of blocking this stupid Admiral BS, I’ve gotten it to a point where it consistently gives me the bypass option but I’d prefer it to go away entirely

  • @perniciousanteater
    link
    11 hour ago

    I leave uBlock off by default and only turn it on for abusive sites, but I also use Vivaldi with tracker blocking enabled so I still get these popups.

    It usually ends with me blocking all ads in order to block the popup asking me not to block ads.

  • @PugJesus
    link
    English
    1911 hours ago

    I have adblocker solely set up to block Youtube ads.

    They broke the implicit contract of “Don’t make ads too intrusive and I won’t go out of my way to block your revenue”. THEY DREW FIRST BLOOD

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5014 hours ago

    I’m sorry but advertisements are too often a vehicle for scams and malware. It’s not merely a preference. They pose a very real danger due to a lack of enforcement of good advertising policies and ethics.

  • @Psythik
    link
    1412 hours ago

    If you’re seeing these, then you need to change your settings in Ublock Origin to enable more filters. Anti-adblock killer is the filter you want, I believe.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17 hours ago

    If I ever implant myself with a chip for brain augmentation is going to be an adblock that acts directly on my neocortex. The ultimate block.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 hours ago

      Nah you also gotta make sure your browser is safe. Don’t want to crypto mine for some libertarians 🤢.

  • rem26_art
    link
    fedilink
    1013 hours ago

    “Turn off your adblocker so we can make your day pop”

    No thanks i dont want popup ads

  • @ilinamorato
    link
    1214 hours ago

    If they really wanted me to whitelist them in my adblocker, they’d make the ads less onerous.

  • @Limonene
    link
    1114 hours ago

    I’ve never seen this. Just checked ZDNet’s website and it didn’t show anything about my ad blocker.

    I block ads because they are such a distraction that I can’t read, and because auctioning off arbitrary javascript to the highest bidder is just asking to be hacked. If ads were not animated, and had no external or obfuscated javascript, I might not block them.

    But as is, I’d rather close the tab than enable ads.

    • @cm0002OP
      link
      214 hours ago

      It might have to do with the aggressiveness that I block ADs, I have ad blocking at the device and network levels. Since I also have a way to over-powered pfSense server I pretty much don’t care about all those giant dnsbl lists that have the “Performance hit warning” lmao

  • Destide
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1014 hours ago

    Usually paper companies trying to play electric games

  • @Lauchs
    link
    815 hours ago

    If it’s a site I use regularly, I’ll disable ad blocker, especially news. It’d be childish demand people provide me their time, labour and effort for free, especially when the ads cost me nothing.

    • @cm0002OP
      link
      32
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I’ve tried that before, was I rewarded with peaceful well placed ADs? Hell no, I was inundated with full page auto-playing monstrosities so fuck that.

      Maybe if it’s a small time website I’ll just pay with donations or a subscription, but fuck these big time conglomerate owned websites

      • @Lauchs
        link
        38 hours ago

        Have you subscribed or paid for many? If so, thank you! But sadly, most of us don’t.

        I’m not talking big conglomerates, I’m talking about independent journalism or folks who are working to build something meaningful or beneficial to me, like webcomics or fantasy hockey.

        Since people started getting news online for free, quality independent journalism has plummeted and we’ve been left with mostly corpo media with a few indies hanging on or getting absorbed into corpo. I think it’s a tragedy which adblockers have accelerated.

    • themeatbridge
      link
      1214 hours ago

      I don’t demand anything, but I’m not responsible for making sure anyone else makes money. Sell it, give it away, or don’t. Don’t beg me to allow third parties to infect my devices just because they paid you to ask me.

      • @Lauchs
        link
        39 hours ago

        How do you expect the websites you use to exist if everyone ad blocks them?

        • themeatbridge
          link
          07 hours ago

          Lot’s of websites exist. How did they do it before invasive ads and tracking?

          • @Lauchs
            link
            36 hours ago

            Back in the day, before ad blockers general unobtrusive ads generated more revenue per site visit. As ad blockers become popular, the value of those same ads were worth less.

            So, to answer your question, they were able to pay the bills with discreet ads which we decided were too annoying, leading to the current spiral of decline.

    • don
      link
      fedilink
      614 hours ago

      Yeah, I tried that for a while, then those sites abused that privilege with horrid obnoxious ads so I decided to nuke any ads anywhere.

      I’m certainly glad that your tolerance to ads is such that you’re willing to endure them for whatever media it is that you consume, and encourage you to disable your adblockers entirely (given that ads really don’t cost you personally anything), but as for me and mine, we will block ads with a near religious fervor.

      Cheers!

      • @Lauchs
        link
        19 hours ago

        Honestly, I don’t use many random websites frequently, the ones I do tend to be pretty non intrusive in terms of ads (cbc, dobberhockey etc) so it might just be lucky on my part.

        I dunno, I just think it’s a race to the bottom. If everyone ad blocks then sites either don’t exist, have to get more intrusive for the small sliver who doesn’t ad block or sketchy partnerships.

      • @Lauchs
        link
        19 hours ago

        Yup. Everyone wants everything free but simultaneously want a high standard of wages for everyone except whomever is providing them a service.

        Folks dress it up in whatever nonsensical rationale they’d like but really, I think we’re just selfish.

    • L3ft_F13ld!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      513 hours ago

      I can appreciate your viewpoint, but I disagree. If I can’t use my adblocker on your site, I don’t need your site.

      There are no acceptable ads and there haven’t been for a very long time. Plus, I’ve been blocking ads for so long I can’t even remember an internet that has them. Probably part of the reason why I refuse any kind of ads.

      • @Lauchs
        link
        19 hours ago

        So why should anyone make a website for you to visit?

        Donations etc haven’t been particularly effective. Should only giant corpo media exist? Should online news enter into sketchy deals with whomever?

        • L3ft_F13ld!
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          No not at all. But the ads on the internet are actively malicious. They’re misleading at best and actually dangerous at worst. I refuse to support that.

          I really am sorry for the smaller sites that need the ads to run. But I won’t help you if the ads don’t change.

          • @Lauchs
            link
            239 minutes ago

            So again, how should small websites exist then?

            Donations and subscriptions almost never work unless you are already a well trafficked website so I’m curious what your solution is…

  • @danekrae
    link
    513 hours ago

    I do feel guilty sometimes… Then I continue.

    Just like I do when I watch the porn the adblocker’s help me watch…

  • ohellidk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Using the “bypass paywalls clean” extension gets rid of most of it. I’m using Firefox.