• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    158 hours ago

    I honestly don’t get why people like Go. Structural typing makes it so difficult to find classes that interpret an interface. Every dumb go project has to be opened in an IDE or something with a language server to find implementors of an interface. Also, forcing every capitalised object in a module or struct to be exported is just… wat? Returning a tuple of whatever, err also feels wrong. It’s like they couldn’t decide between throwing exceptions or an enum and went with something in between.

    I get that the inbuilt concurrency features are nice, but the rest of the language and stdlib feel very lackluster. At least that’s my impression after ~2 weeks of it. My retreat to Rust was rather quick.

    Anti Commercial-AI license

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      23 hours ago

      The stdlib I actually find quite complete. Especially for http projects. You really don’t need third party libs for that for example.

      The errors were super strange to me at the start, but I’ve come to really like it over exceptions. It is similar to old error codes, but I feel that this makes one always have to be mindful of error handling and the non happy path (thinking of large Python projects where no one cares about exceptions).

      A lot of people tend to compare Go and Rust, but I feel that the languages are just too different. Rust is good for a variety of things which don’t overlap with the things Go is good for.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        43 hours ago

        It is similar to old error codes, but I feel that this makes one always have to be mindful of error handling and the non happy path

        Technically you need a separate linter (errcheck) to ensure you don’t just ignore errors. This is…not great. (That should have been a compiler error.)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 hours ago

          Yes, true. Having it built in in the compilation would be nice. Or at least having errcheck as a tool which already comes packed with Go.

          Go has changed over time to include more things like this. Maybe one day this will be addressed.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 hour ago

            Yeah, I was particularly glad to see the change in loop variable semantics become a stable part of the language. That was a terrible footgun.

            There are other things I dislike about Go, but I do think it’s improving while maintaining its better qualities, which is no small feat.

  • @Solemarc
    link
    1911 hours ago

    Are you trying to use the Lord’s JS to read files from your PC?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      811 hours ago

      read svg file with path given in config

      Know Jack shit about go and since all you need to do is read a file and put it in I thought I’d let ai handle it

      İt took me far too long and I was just done with it by then and the ai for some reason is acting fucking playful it’s even mocking me I can’t handle it

      • @Solemarc
        link
        1210 hours ago

        My comment was supposed to be a bit of a joke…

        Generally speaking, you cannot read a file from disk using JS in the browser because the sandbox doesn’t allow the code access to your disk. If you googled something like “read a file JS” it probably made an assumption that you’re using Server side like nodejs or deno. The only exception for in-browser that I know of is to upload files using an input tag.

        • Pup Biru
          link
          fedilink
          English
          810 hours ago

          that looks like a go template, so i’d wager it’s something server-side

          • @Solemarc
            link
            18 hours ago

            Maybe, I’ve never used go templates before.