• Caveman
    link
    56 hours ago

    Shouldn’t be legal at all

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1818 hours ago

    Cool, they can survive just fine for five years and then sell :/

    This is one useless restriction

  • SGG
    link
    English
    8523 hours ago

    So they can still collect it, use it for internal purposes, then after 5 years still sell it?

    • @Hominy_Hank
      link
      2723 hours ago

      Legally, only if you let them. Illegally, what’s the point of the conversation on the first place?

      The settlement also requires GM to obtain consent from customers before collecting their driving behavior data, and allow them to request and delete their data if they choose.

      • SGG
        link
        English
        2223 hours ago

        Sadly I expect They’ll just add a very innocuous line and/or checkbox to the EULA for their infotainment system. 99% of people will just tick it even if optional.

        • @Hominy_Hank
          link
          522 hours ago

          That goes without saying. And I’m at the point where if people don’t care enough to check that kind of stuff, then I don’t care enough to worry about them.

          My 2025 moto is “you have no excuse to be ignorant anymore.”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2222 hours ago

            If you don’t agree then you can’t use the product. Companies do it all the time. You’ve said yes everytime. It should be illegal to hold anything hostage like that.

            Don’t agree with a carmaker using and selling your data? Oh look now the cars computer won’t work for you.

            • d00phy
              link
              English
              11
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              Exactly! That and burying their underhandedness in a 5000-word legal document presented to me on a 8” screen when I first start up my car. It’s an unrealistic expectation the people will read and understand every obnoxiously long EULA they’re presented with. They’re specifically written NOT to be read or understood by the average person, FFS.

            • @Hominy_Hank
              link
              -117 hours ago

              A car dealer is not going to pass up a sale because the customer won’t agree to the manufacturer collecting and selling the customers data.

              Sure with software the company can just prevent you from using their product. But a physical item such as a vehicle? Please.

              Besides GM was order to allow people to opt-out. They can’t force data collection on you like Google can.

    • Trailblazing Braille Taser
      link
      fedilink
      519 hours ago

      I’m curious what the dollar value of this data is per capita. Imagine if you could simply pay $1 for exclusive rights to data collected by GM. Back in reality, they’d go “oops, we sold your data again and hoped you wouldn’t notice.”

  • rem26_art
    link
    fedilink
    4122 hours ago

    Data brokers setting a calendar reminder for 5 years from now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3622 hours ago

      GM is banned for selling the data.

      They are going to give it away for free…with the purchase of this really cool red paperclip.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3223 hours ago

    … Weren’t they doing it illegally/without consent already?

    “you’re banned from committing crime”

    • toiletobserver
      link
      822 hours ago

      I’m sure they’ll be closely monitored over the next four years

  • @ohlaph
    link
    819 hours ago

    So… Don’t buy GM. Check.

    • @mx_smith
      link
      413 hours ago

      I think GM owns OnStar, so many car models have this installed. I unplugged the OnStar system in my Honda just to prevent this.