Per the title, is Lemmy actually growing, or will it stagnate and fade into obscurity like many other similar discussion boards?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    73 hours ago

    It seems to be on a healthy state, there are some communities that I would like to have more content. But that’s also on me to share and contribute to the communities I would like to see.

    Being a bystander on reddit for so long it’s a bit difficult to change that mindset, but I’m trying to share a bit more

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 hours ago

      Me too! Sometimes I forget that I can participate in the discussion and even post cool stuff I’m doing. After all, that’s the whole point of this kind of community.

  • airportline
    link
    fedilink
    English
    214 hours ago

    According to fedidb.org, Lemmy has plateaued at around 43k active users over the past year.

    If you ask me, though, it doesn’t matter. The Lemmy ecosystem is active and healthy.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    196 hours ago

    I moved to Lemmy during the reddut exodus itsjustt become better overtime I don’t miss reddit at all. Also lots of fellow Linux and free software nerds over here and I like that.

  • @nutsack
    link
    02 hours ago

    The intelligence of the commentary here certainly isn’t

  • mosscap
    link
    fedilink
    English
    519 hours ago

    From the perspective of someone who has been on Lemmy for a few years now, I’ll say that the amount of content here has become large enough for me to use Lemmy as a “daily driver” account. I don’t miss out on important news or updates by using Lemmy instead of Reddit…in fact it often feels quite the opposite

  • TacoButtPlug
    link
    fedilink
    English
    97 hours ago

    I feel like the content is becoming more robust and the userbase is keeping up. I think it’s going to be super necessary pretty soon down the road.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    229 hours ago

    Lack of growth does not mean death. That’s a capitalistic mindset. It’s entirely possible for a community to be sustainable based on the people it has and have no need to grow. Lemmy’s not trying to sell a product; there’s no need for it to grow. People can join if they want to, and people can leave if they want to.

    In terms of actual future prospects, Lemmy seems fairly large to me, and regardless of whether its userbase is growing or shrinking, it would have to shrink by quite a lot to become “dead”. Especially as Reddit continues to enshittify, I imagine its userbase will only grow. Hard to find social medias of this nature otherwise; almost all other social media is based around following people, not communities, and also obviously most social media is much more commercialised, less anonymous, much less text-friendly, etc, so link aggregator/Reddit style social medias fill in a niche people want and people who want a social media in this niche will gravitate towards the one they see as the best social media for whatever reason. Maybe Reddit because it’s the biggest, maybe Lemmy because Reddit is shit and Lemmy is federated and open-source, maybe their niche alternative because they’re part of a specific niche community that uses different software, who knows.

  • Revv
    link
    fedilink
    14514 hours ago

    I think the premise is flawed. Most of us have been brought up in a world that preaches “if you’re not growing, you’re dying.” That mindset is harmful in a whole host of ways. I have no idea if lemmy is growing or not, but it’s quite possible, perhaps even preferable, for a service/site/mom-and-pop shop to be sustainable without unending growth.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5213 hours ago

      To add, a lot of sites that “Fade into obscurity” still have active communities, they’re just not mainstream anymore.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2613 hours ago

      I would prefer if it grew because so many communities are dead. It seems that only political and shitposting instances have constant activity.

      For me it’s still not a real Reddit alternative. Which sucks because I’m permabanned from Reddit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 hours ago

        Which communities are you into?

        I like the political aspect of lemmy tho. Much more civil and decent, especially disallowing the usage of slurs. The major benefit with that it avoids the discussion being derailed into personal attacks and ultimately people forgetting about what the topic was.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        811 hours ago

        Lemmy is slowly accumulating mass - I’d really love it if we gained a number of strong niche communities, but didn’t turn into a reddit due to mass influx.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          49 hours ago

          I think the best thing of reddit is them having so many actually active niche subreddits. Many people saying Lemmy doesn’t need to grow don’t seem to care much about that which surprises me a bit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          112 hours ago

          Doesnt work. They ban your ip, MAC address, email, everything. They even have a tool that flags people that may be doing ban evasion based on behavior and communities that are joined by said account. You could get around it but it’s way too much effort just to use reddit.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 hours ago

              Ah well I’m just parroting what I’ve read. I’m only superficially familiar with most tech stuff. I do know that the ban at least applies to the device, email and ip address for sure.

    • xapr [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      610 hours ago

      This is exactly on the nose. It reminds of articles I’ve read about the oldest continuously operating businesses in the world. Here’s an example: https://www.theceomagazine.com/business/management-leadership/japan-oldest-businesses/

      Note that one thing in common between many of these businesses, some of which have been around for nearly 1,500 years(!), is that they are family owned and operated. In other words, they prioritized stability over rapid growth. I feel that there’s a huge lesson in this.

    • db0
      link
      fedilink
      1313 hours ago

      Correct. We don’t have need to be growing. 40k mau are nothing to scoff at and is bigger than most other online forums who can feel very busy even with 1000. So long as we’re getting as many users as we’re losing, we’re good. And the continuous enshittification of reddit will ensure there’s always people looking for a new home.

    • comfy
      link
      fedilink
      210 hours ago

      for a service/site/mom-and-pop shop to be sustainable without unending growth.

      I’ve been on somewhat niche sites which have lasted decades, with waves of people coming in whenever related sites screw up and trickles of people leaving when an alternative community becomes more popular. It’s a comfy, slow existence, which works for some communities, but not for ones like this which thrive on diversity and chattiness, rather than really well thought-out replies days apart from each other. On reddit-like sites, time penalizes how high a post goes (unlike a forum where years-long threads are very normal to see on a front page) so there is an inherent benefit in having consistent activity. That doesn’t imply boundless growth, but at least sustaining a decent level of activity. We’re not chasing ad revenue, growth for growth’s sake is not what we want or need.

      But with that said, a community with no new visitors can only lose them. That can be a slow process, but it’s inevitable. Been there, done that. Again, doesn’t imply that pointless growth is a good thing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 hours ago

      That’s some serious copium, and the other replies are worse. “If you’re not growing you’re dying” is bullshit when you control a large portion of the potential market, but not when you’re a bit player. Being less popular than a manifestly shitty platform like Reddit is not a flex and not a sign of long-term health.

      • Revv
        link
        fedilink
        19 hours ago

        It’s not copium, it’s just an acknowledgment that I, and presumably many others, don’t care or need to care if it’s popular- it is already useful to me as is. In the same way, I’ve never given much of a shit about “the year of Linux on the desktop”; Linux has been useful to me as a daily driver for the past 28-ish years and neither my enjoyment of it nor its utility to me were in any way hampered by its failure to achieve supremacy of numbers.

        It’s fine to use something other than the most popular service.

        Now, if you think the purpose of federated social media is solely to supplant the corporate, centralized platforms, then I understand, but disagree with, your position.

  • Die4Ever
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    or will it stagnate and fade into obscurity like many other similar discussion boards?

    well it wouldn’t really play out like that, if Lemmy gets overtaken by a replacement (like Mbin, Piefed, or Sublinks), it would be a transition not a death

    a big thing we can look forwards to right now is if Pixelfed gets better support to interact with Lemmy/etc communities/groups then we can get a big boost in userbase, even if they aren’t using the Lemmy software we’ll still be seeing their posts and comments

    I wish Mastodon would improve their compatibility with Lemmy too, but they don’t seem interested

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    89 hours ago

    IRC is still around. Usenet is still around.

    There’s no Google management team or Zuckerberg to pull the plug.

    Lemmy can keep going indefinitely.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13 hours ago

      Source

      I find it kinda concerning how the number of instances is shrinking and number of users per instance is going up. IMO it should be part of the fediverse design to incentivize decentralization to avoid a gmail situation.

      Also worrying is that the number of Active Users is trending constant or slightly down, but the number of posts over time is climbing dramatically. To me, this could be a sign of inauthentic behaviour on the rise.

    • @njm1314
      link
      813 hours ago

      Total post doesn’t really tell us much. Of course there’s going to be more posts over time. Hell there are Bots that post things. That number is going to go up as long as the servers exist. There could be no human users on here and those are going to go up.

      • db0
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        This is just absolute number total posts and they’re a shitposting heaven that existed for 4 years before the big reddit exodus. In monthly posts they’re still in the top 10 iirc but not 2nd

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      413 hours ago

      sh.it.heads: “We’re number 5! We’re number 5!”

      (me. I’m probably the only one chanting at this fact)

  • @BananaTrifleViolin
    link
    English
    2513 hours ago

    So from what I’ve seen on Lemmy over the last year is that the quantity of posts and variety of topics feels like it’s going up. I certainly enjoy engaging on here.

    Will it stagnate? I’m not sure. It might be that the monthly user levels stabilise but thats not the same as stagnate. If people are engaged and enjoying their time then it has value.

    My feeling is that Lemmy will slowly grow over time. I don’t see it becoming a huge platform like Reddit anytime soon. Its feasible but it feels like for now it will remain niche.

    But I also dont want to it suddenly become huge. I was on reddit for a long time and I saw it evolve from being something small and interesting to a behemoth and enshittification to make money. Small is sometimes better, and small or stable in no way means stagnation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      412 hours ago

      What we really need is for people to put up topic focused sites and promote them as their own thing, not jusy “lemmy”. So many specific interests still have very active forums dedicated to them, populated by the kind of people who want to ask queations aboht and discuss the things they have interest or expertise in, but who aren’t into things like Reddit.

      The fediverse is perfect for places like that. Places where you can focus on your primary interest, but also look over the fence. But all anyone wants to do is put up general interest sites and whine about there being more than one “gaming” forum.

      • Die4Ever
        link
        fedilink
        19 hours ago

        So many specific interests still have very active forums dedicated to them, populated by the kind of people who want to ask queations aboht and discuss the things they have interest or expertise in

        I hope these types of sites eventually switch off of software like phpBB and move to software like Lemmy/Mbin

        Maybe someone should make a database migration tool so posts/comments/users can be retained

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1713 hours ago

    I can be very critical of the fediverse, especially where I want it to do better, but I think stagnation isn’t the right word I think ‘maintaining’ fits more. The fediverse isn’t beholden to the grow or die model capitalist projects need and it remains a space that is unique enough to warrant people coming back here, or coming here for certain reasons or content or whatever. I think the model to hope for would be continue maintaining and being ready for when the next group of people get fed up enough to follow through and come here (fediverse in general)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      512 hours ago

      I would say yes, because as is the real niche communities dont have the size for larger discussions.

      Mainstream communities e.g. about global news already have a decent size. And in many ways it doesn’t make much of a qualitative difference if there are 500 or 10.000 predictable comments. But many smaller communities are still mostly propped up by a few power users providing the majority of content which is not ideal for many reasons.

  • mesamune
    link
    English
    913 hours ago

    One thing is that kbin/mbin/piefed/etc…etc… interact with lemmy all the time. Its getting a bit hazy if “lemmy” the platform is growing or if the entirety of the fediverse is growing and others are communicating with the software. We are now seeing quite a few accounts from all over the web interacting with lemmy communities. Is that a new “user” according to the stats? Or is that person a one off from mastodon?

    What I a seeing is a general increase in discussion on the platform and increase in posts from all over the fediverse. Which is awesome!