In my eyes, news outlets like for example ProPublica had started to lose respect, because they still use Twitter like nothing ever happened.

Why they don’t leave like what The Guardian did or like the other news outlets?

Are they too corporate internally to leave Twitter?

  • hendrik
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13 hours ago

    You need to be a bit more patient. It’s happening. Lots of people are leaving Twitter/X. But it takes time.

  • PonyOfWar
    link
    fedilink
    209 hours ago

    It’s a bit of a dilemma. If you leave, you’ll also leave Twitter’s (still large) userbase to freely be manipulated by the far-right without any objections. If you stay, you support a network owned and controlled by a fascist. By continuing to provide content you encourage other people to stay on the platform. I’m personally in favor of everyone leaving, but I understand why some organizations don’t. The least they should do is establish a presence on other networks so nobody has to use Twitter to see their content though.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    108 hours ago

    Most news outlets nowadays are the equivalent of Buzzfeed. They do whatever get them clicks. Journalism is optional. And so is any sense of ethics

    If their customers don’t punish them by withholding their money/support, their rich owners are definitely not going to push for a change. You saw how the main tech giants bent their knees at Trump’s inauguration

    • @JubilantJaguar
      link
      67 hours ago

      OP specified nonprofit outlets. Of which there are more and more, and they don’t have the same incentives. Important not to fall into cynicism on this subject.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 hours ago

        OP specified nonprofit outlets

        Fair point! I thought I specified “most mainstream news outlets” but I actually did not in the end

        Important not to fall into cynicism on this subject.

        Eh. You call it cynicism, I call it realism. To each their own

  • slazer2au
    link
    English
    2311 hours ago

    Because that is where people were and still are. So their processes are still to put content there.

    • @Acamon
      link
      49 hours ago

      That’s a self fulfilling cycle. If more institutions and organisation left and made a public statement of not wanting to be associated with fascism, then it would push another bunch to have to defend why they didn’t think nazi salutes were a problem, and they’d leave too.

      Whether it makes enough of a wave to push major groups to leave is a question of public pressure, but that public pressure is expressed through “costly signalling” that show organisations have values and are willing to take a hit to live by them. And non-profits are exactly the groups who can afford to take a symbolic stand, and make things more difficult for those that remain.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1110 hours ago

        The Guardian is a top newspaper. Number 3ish in the UK. It already has a massive following.

        The people being mad at propublica for not leaving I think is something only happening in your social sphere

      • Libb
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Why most reasonable US citizen won’t leave the US now that the orange dude is in charge, free to spread his terrible ideology? Probably because they can’t leave the country (their job, their family, their friends…). The same goes for most media, they need to reach their audience and a lot of their audience is still on X. Edit: and because they refuse to leave the country in the hands of the Orange dude, too.

        Papers like The Guardian are able to take risks, because they don’t rely on ads revenues but on subscriptions and because they also know some of their audience (hi, guys) aren’t on X anymore ;)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I would guess it’s because there are no other alternatives to X that are as big and as popular.

    • Corroded
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 hours ago

      Easy as well. Things like Bluesky could be a bit confusing for newcomers

      • @glimse
        link
        57 hours ago

        Mastodon, the alternative I hoped took off, has a confusing onboarding process for non-techies. But Bluesky’s is not confusing at all, it’s as good as Twitter’s ever was

        • @TigerClawTV
          link
          English
          23 hours ago

          Mastodon is great. Decentralized is a must.

          • @glimse
            link
            33 hours ago

            I don’t disagree but they need something to make it more attractive to new users. The only person I talked into making an account got confused selecting a server…but I’ve gotten a half dozen people on bluesky with no handholding

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 hours ago

          It got a bit more popularity over the last half of year. Not as big as X, but not small AF and it’s the best “easy” alternative. The best “hard” alternative is mastodon, what makes it “hard” is it’s very fragmented and it takes some efforts to pick instance, to understand consequences of your choice, and to figure out how to use your feed for different scenarios.