• aeiou_ckr
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Any chance you can share the good word on the name of the list?

        • mypasswordis1234
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          There are several of them and they come pre-installed with uBlock but you have to tick the checkbox next to each of them to activate them. They are located in the “Cookie notices” category.

          P.S. I also suggest ticking off all the lists in the “Annoyances” category 🙂

    • brb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Does it really say no automatically or just hide the banners? I thought Consent-o-Matic was the only plugin that actually clicks no

  • credo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Accept?

    Option 1: Yes ✅

    Option2: Let’s play a game!

    • hydration9806@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And Consent-O-Matic to never see another cookie popup and Cookie AutoDelete to delete any that get through

      • Phuntis@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        cookie auto delete isn’t necessary you can set firefox to not remember cookies anyway ubo also has filter lists go remove cookie popups though it doesn’t catch all of them so I won’t say consent o matic is unnecessary but I don’t use it and I very rarely see a cookie popup

  • LovableSidekick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s always been like that, they just didn’t use to have to ask.

    • stinky@redlemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Forcing these popups in our faces was punishment for fighting back during the battle for the internet. We lost, and the elites shoved insulting disruptive messages in our faces to remind us of our failure every time we browse. I was so disappointed.

      • LovableSidekick
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Web developer here. Cookies were designed to get around the stateless nature of a web page, by enabling it to communicate with other pages from one visit to the next by saving things like the user’s language preference. Marketing people saw this and said hey, let’s generate a unique ID the first time a user hits our site, and store it in a cookie with information about their clicks, searches, etc. This will help us decide which ads to throw at them, and we can even sell that info to other companies so they can use it and add more info. It’s a gold mine! Germany passed a law requiring transparency and user consent, forcing sites visible in Germany (i.e. the whole Internet) to display those warnings or risk legal problems.

    • devfuuu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Dear old Internet Explorer in windows 98 and Me asked a lot.

      • LovableSidekick
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Really? That was when I getting into web dev and IE got dynamic HTML, but I don’t remember the cookie thing. I thought it was after German laws started requiring user approval. Long time ago. Come to think of it, Win98 was right about when the dominant influence at MS transitioned from geeks to accountants.

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    I hate that they’re called cookies. Cookies are supposed to be great! Cooties would be a better word. Or AIDS.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Oh, cooties is a great idea!
      Is headcanon now (much better than how I always called them anyway).

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    As someone who used to work in the identity management/authorization field… Not all cookies are bad. But yeah, I still agree.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      My favorite is when webpages offer either “Accept all” or “Technically required only”, as if anyone would ever want anything else than just the technically required.

      • Dasus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I was just on a website that gave a warning when trying to accept only necessary.

        So I’m sure some less informed people just conform instead of thinking or even maybe reading the warning.

        These cookie things are the epitome of asshole design. Hidden “legitimate interest” weird colours for on/off, I can’t even be arsed to list it all.

  • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    For those already using unblock origin that don’t know this: In the unlock settings you can enable additional filter lists. There are two for these cookie banners too. You never see these aids banners with it.

  • Olhonestjim
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    They act like it’s a treat they’re offering us, when it’s more like a poison pill in most cases.

  • luluu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Your porn websites have cookie banners?