Summary

Efforts to impeach Donald Trump for a third time are intensifying as he begins his second term.

The non-partisan group Free Speech For People launched the “Impeach Trump. Again” campaign, citing constitutional violations, including his alleged role in the January 6 Capitol riots and breaches of the emoluments clause.

The group also accuses Trump of campaign finance violations, xenophobic rhetoric, and abuse of power.

However, impeachment remains unlikely with Republicans controlling Congress. Democrats may revisit impeachment if they regain control in 2026.

  • @Furbag
    link
    626 minutes ago

    “Surely, this time, impeachment will have consequences!”

    Even if it passes, he will never be removed from office. There is no low that Trump can sink to where Republicans will not fall in lockstep with him. It’s pointless.

    • @Dkarma
      link
      31 hour ago

      Who gives a shit if they’re partisan. The fashies call everything left of trump partisan

  • Doug Holland
    link
    English
    2417 hours ago

    Nothing news from an empty source.

    • @LemmyFeed
      link
      24 hours ago

      Lol as proved last time, impeachment means absolutely nothing. It didn’t stop the last corrupt individual, in fact he was just reelected and is as corrupt, if not more, than before.

      • @LifeInMultipleChoice
        link
        116 minutes ago

        Yeah, unless the Senate finds him guilty, which they didn’t last time and won’t likely this time, if won’t stop him.

      • @lurklurk
        link
        237 minutes ago

        It’s certainly doomed, but democrats already get paid to be there so why not use every tool in the book? Time Congress is arguing about impeachment is time they’re not implementing fascist policies

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 hours ago

        Exactly. The corrupt individual couldn’t be stopped because theres an entire corrupted party that supports the corrupt individual.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      512 hours ago

      the american democracy would be pretty good, if it wasn’t for parties… now it’s a never ending competition between two conspiracies

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        66 hours ago

        Lol its not the “parties”

        The constitution never said anything about the two-party system.

        That was an emergent property of FPTP voting system

        TLDR: Fuck the FPTP system

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
        link
        78 hours ago

        And it’s not like we didn’t fuckin’ see it coming, either. Washington, with one foot out the door: “Don’t deify me, don’t form political parties.”

        So, guess what else nobody listed to him about?

  • @dance_ninja
    link
    371 day ago

    No GOP backing, so this is meaningless theater.

    • @Rakonat
      link
      English
      2123 hours ago

      Exactly. He’s been impeached twice and nothing happened. He should have been barred from office years ago. The entire process is nothing but political theatre for donors.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      215 hours ago

      How many times did the magahats offer impeachment articles for Biden? The theater isn’t meant to be successful, but just a constant buzz for voters.

    • @LifeInMultipleChoice
      link
      113 minutes ago

      It’s a process. It is like filing charges against someone, and then the Senate holds the trial. The Senate found him not guilty. So there were no consequences.

  • @rational_lib
    link
    151 day ago

    FFS no. All it did the last two times was help him, because impeachment is basically impossible and he’s going to “win”.

  • @jordanlundM
    link
    1432 days ago

    Jesus Christ… NO.

    Same as the last two times, it’s a wasted effort without the votes in the Senate. If you can’t remove him, don’t bother. Focus on winning back the House and Senate in 2026.

    • Banana
      link
      fedilink
      1352 days ago

      Time and time again, this image remains relevant

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        69
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Without the ACA I would’ve entered life-altering levels of debt (or died?) so I have a slightly more favorable view of democrats than this. Occasionally they move the needle, even if I find them incredibly frustrating.

        • Banana
          link
          fedilink
          32
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          They absolutely can do good things, I was mostly referring to the fact that they knew that what is happening would happen and yet put in zero protections to protect Americans from literal fascism, instead they used fear mongering as a campaign tactic.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -21 day ago

          ACA eas what the Republicans were pushing for 20 years ago. Obamacare was straight up a copy of Mitt Romney’s healthcare plan in Massachusetts, jjst at the federal level.

          • @Plastic_Ramses
            link
            71 day ago

            Did you know that when aragorn kicked the helmet, he broke his toe, and the yelling in the movie was actually his cries of pain they kept to enhance the scene?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -32 days ago

          I’m certainly glad the ACA helped you, and it certainly did address some major issues, but it was also massive wealth transfer to the top, and it had led directly into the financialization of healthcare that’s currently destroying the system. Doctors are leaving medicine in droves and regularly takes six months or more to get an appointment with many specialties.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            82 days ago

            It was a bandaid on a festering wound of already financialized Healthcare, it’s just continued to get worse as expected because the ACA was a half ass attempt at actually brining Healthcare to the people.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -32 days ago

              There was no large scale takeover of healthcare by Wall Street. There is a big difference between commercialization and financialization. By pumping billions into health are and allowing investors to siphon those billions right back out again, the ACA created a feeding frenzy. I’m old enough to remember a healthcare system that was largely owned and managed by medical professionals, not hedge funds and private equity.

              Then, of course, there are the larger impacts of income inequality that this exacerbated. The ACA was one of many things done by both Republicans and Democrats that turned this country into a Russian style oligarchy.

              It’s not incidental that the design for the ACA came from the same right wing think tank that produced project 2025. It’s all part of the same project.

              • @Nightwingdragon
                link
                English
                72 days ago

                It’s not incidental that the design for the ACA came from the same right wing think tank that produced project 2025. It’s all part of the same project.

                Actually, no. The design for the ACA was actually based on the healthcare reforms put in place by Mitt Romney when he was governor of Massachusetts, which were considered very popular and successful. The problem is that when they tried to make it go national, Republicans in general didn’t want to give Obama a win, so they gutted it as much as possible.

                Romneycare was pretty god damned good, even after the gutting it’s taken over the years. If the ACA was built on what Romneycare originally was, we’d probably be in much better shape than we’re in now.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 day ago

                  You sure about that?. What do you think Romneycare was based on? Romneycare had many of the same issues. It really doesn’t help the case that Obamacare’s implementation was worse.

          • ThrowawayOnLemmy
            link
            72 days ago

            And this wouldn’t have happened with private insurance without ACA because…?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 day ago

              It probably would have happened, but the ACA was like throwing gas on a fire or chumming for sharks. The individual mandate concept was specifically designed to derail actual reforms and accelerate wealth aggregation, and that’s exactly what it did.

              Do you think the Heritage Foundation was actually concerned about access to quality healthcare for everyone? We still spend even more person on healthcare than anywhere else on the planet, yet we still have 26 million Americans with no healthcare plan.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 days ago

        One of the things I hate about yes minister is how it still applies 40 years later. Like f%@$!

        • Banana
          link
          fedilink
          212 days ago

          Ya I always laugh when people talk about how accurately the Simpsons predicts things. It’s like, no, politics is just that fucking cyclical and the writers were smart.

          I say were because it’s not what it used to be.

      • @HerrBeter
        link
        42 days ago

        Though I’d argue the Ds can govern

        • @Clinicallydepressedpoochie
          link
          2
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          They do ok. But look at what’s going on with gaza. They definitely arent batting 100. Plus all the governing they sometimes do must equally benefit the wealthy class or it won’t happen.

          • @HerrBeter
            link
            223 hours ago

            Sure, but on the second point the GOP is so horrendous

        • Banana
          link
          fedilink
          31 day ago

          They could have prevented this from happening and chose to use the fear of fascism as a campaign tactic instead of putting in any protections. I’d say that’s a pretty big failure to govern.

    • @Feathercrown
      link
      English
      61 day ago

      This is actually counterproductive, the more times we do it when it’s guaranteed to lose, the less likely it is to work.

    • djsoren19
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 day ago

      Ah, but this is the least effective way for Democrats to show their donors that they’re still “fighting” for them. The only thing that matters now is manufacturing some talking point to get more donations in 2026.

    • themeatbridge
      link
      20
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Impeachment is the check against his power. It would be better to convict, but the democrats need to make the argument and convince the people that Trump should be held accountable. Get Republicans in the Senate and House on record supporting Trump’s crimes, and then beat them in the midterm elections.

      Impeachment is how you win those elections. Rolling over and showing your belly is why Democrats keep losing before the fight begins.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        After January 6 they got several Republicans on the record for impeachment and conviction. All it did was get almost all the ones who did the right thing primaried out, all of which have been replaced by MAGA faithfuls. Those who voted against were praised for it and given more power.

        • themeatbridge
          link
          72 days ago

          I mean, in a better world, we would have competent progressives who know how to run on an anti-fascist campaign. That we’re losing the fight is not a reason to stop fighting. It’s a reason to reevaluate our tactics and fight harder.

          • Doug Holland
            link
            English
            217 hours ago

            There are competent progressives who know how to run on an anti-fascist campaign. The Democratic Party stands in their way.

            • themeatbridge
              link
              115 hours ago

              I’m not saying you’re wrong, because I know they exist, but they could be running the party.

      • @sunbrrnslapper
        link
        112 days ago

        In this moment impeachment is a waste of time. They would be better served (1) governing super well in places they are in charge (to demonstrate they are the better option - something that is inconsistent today); (2) figuring out why people are voting for Trump; (3) developing strong messaging and strategy to win races top to bottom of the ballot. I’ve been unimpressed with their ability to both run and govern recently (with some exceptions here and there). Maybe it is catching up with them.

        • @halcyoncmdr
          link
          English
          112 days ago

          In this moment impeachment is a waste of time.

          Any time he’s focusing on that is time he’s not actively fucking shit up. Being obstructionist is what’s gotten the Republicans to the place they are now.

          • @notsoshaihulud
            link
            11 day ago

            And he doesn’t get convicted and he’ll campaign on how nasty the Dems are. An impeachment without conviction is a “win”.

            • themeatbridge
              link
              11 day ago

              And that’s a stupid ass argument. If the Democrats can’t win that debate, then we need better candidates.

              • @notsoshaihulud
                link
                11 day ago

                winning what? debates? you mean reasoning with a pigeon?

                • themeatbridge
                  link
                  01 day ago

                  Are you new? You win by convincing people that you’re right and they should vote for you. You can’t do that if you never make the argument because it’s too hard to win.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 days ago

        I think impeachment makes him stronger, it gives him whining, hysterical liberals to point at. Oppose and resist him, but just by calling out his BS, not trying to give him a traffic ticket and failing.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
        link
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        the democrats need to make the argument and convince the people that Trump should be held accountable

        The people don’t vote on impeachment. Convincing them won’t help.

        Get Republicans in the Senate and House on record supporting Trump’s crimes, and then beat them in the midterm elections.

        Oh you sweet summer child.

    • @Rhoeri
      link
      English
      71 day ago

      Who exactly? Who is pretending they are doing something?? Is it democrats you’re accusing of pretending to do something?

      How about maybe you try reading the article next time instead of chiming in with edgy nonsense.

      It is a non partisan group called Free Speech for People. You’d have known that had you read the 1st paragraph of the article.

      Oh. And while we’re on the subject of pretending… even if you were right and it is the democrats pretending- at least they pretended to do something. Because so many of you flat out admittedly did nothing.

      And look what that got us.

  • @Sam_Bass
    link
    423 hours ago

    Kick that fat stupid bastard out on his diapered ass fast as you can