Lofgren’s bill would impose site-blocking requirements on broadband providers with at least 100,000 subscribers and providers of public domain name resolution services with annual revenue of over $100 million. The bill has exemptions for VPN services and “similar services that encrypt and route user traffic through intermediary servers”; DNS providers that offer service “exclusively through encrypted DNS protocols”; and operators of premises that provide Internet access, like coffee shops, bookstores, airlines, and universities.

Invest in VPN providers.

  • @TropicalDingdong
    link
    English
    1531 month ago

    Really uh…

    Setting themselves up for success uh…

    • @FMT99
      link
      English
      971 month ago

      Great to see our representatives finally focusing on the real issues in these difficult times.

      • @finitebanjo
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        TBH they can’t really pass anything even if they wanted to focus on more important issues. Majority Leaders call votes and they’re both Republicans.

        • @FMT99
          link
          English
          01 month ago

          In a democracy, when you’re not in power what do you do to get that power back? You show the electorate that you’re fighting for what they think is important. If Democrats absolutely insist on business as usual, promoting corporate interests and occasionally pausing to shout “fascist” at Trump, all the while just plain ignoring people’s actual concerns we’re going to lose the next election and the next one.

          • @finitebanjo
            link
            English
            11 month ago

            Democrat*

            Singular, in this case.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1471 month ago

    Democrats: “Please for the love of God, don’t vote for us ever again! We really, really don’t want to win.”

    • @Shardikprime
      link
      English
      151 month ago

      Lemmy: "Fuck that, I’ll vote blue no matter who. You can’t tell me what to do"

      Democrats:

    • fafferlicious
      link
      English
      111 month ago

      D E M O C R A T singular, one. Not democrats. For fucks sake it’s on the bloody title!

      Why are people so willfully ignorant?

      US Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) today proposed …

      • @Vinstaal0
        link
        English
        81 month ago

        Cause people fail to awknowledge there is more to politics than just left and right, or progressive and conservative, etc.

      • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        From California? Hmmm… Why would a representative from California put forward such a bill?

    • Schadrach
      link
      fedilink
      English
      331 month ago

      Of course it is, what else would you expect from the controlled opposition party?

    • I Cast Fist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 month ago

      Why wouldn’t it be? People’s interests don’t bring in money

  • ThePowerOfGeek
    link
    English
    981 month ago

    The country is being burned to the ground from the inside by fascists, and this is the hill Democrat politicians choose to die on?!! Holy shit! What a fucking joke!

    • @WhatAmLemmy
      link
      English
      241 month ago

      Corporate dictatorship masquerading as “democracy”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I don’t think it’s even corporate now. There are oligopolies/monopolies in each sector already

    • @rottingleaf
      link
      English
      71 month ago

      The shepherd and the dog might be in agreement.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    691 month ago

    Democrats: why won’t anyone vote for us?

    Also Democrats: let’s be like the Republicans, they get so many votes! Let’s miss the entire point of democracy and just support large companies!

    • @surph_ninja
      link
      English
      231 month ago

      Because they want the big money donors more than they want to win. Their campaigns are above all designed to bring in money for the high-priced consultants.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    501 month ago

    This somehow reads with the same energy as those “please don’t download scientific papers for free from <long list of websites>, that would be so terrible” posts.

  • @taiyang
    link
    English
    481 month ago

    77 year old who has been in the house since the 90s. Actually a prime example of why we need term limits and real competition in elections (if not from GOP, at least in primaries). Irony is she reps a district that isn’t really associated with streaming or producing movies.

    My guess? She won her primary because she was the incombent or was unopposed, but she probably receives cash from the film industry. Almost all house seats are uncompetitive unless someone drops out or gets redistricted. Until something changes, this is and will be the way our government continues to work.

    • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒
      link
      English
      161 month ago

      in power since the 90s

      Oh so carrying the torch for the LAST time they tried to go after media with the moral panic of “Explicit” music label stuff led by Tipper Gore? The one where Twisted Sister showed up in 1985. A continuation from when they had a panic about VHS recordings in 1969 and Mr Rogers testified.

      • @taiyang
        link
        English
        91 month ago

        I specially went Obama over Clinton because she was still saying in 2008 how video games promote violence. There’s a certain type of Dem, and they’re still ramming them down our throats.

        • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I swear. The harder they mess with this type of stuff the more single-issue-voters it pushes to vote against them. This war on media is such a losing battle I don’t understand why they’re opting to wage it with the current fish on the grill. This kind of unpopular legislation is stuff you try and push when you’re in power, and try to sell it as an “eat your veggies” moment. Rebranding while they’re down certainly makes for an interesting conversation when they rubber band back into power and say “we’ve said we were gonna do this since 2025” type conversation.

  • @hesusingthespiritbomb
    link
    English
    441 month ago

    Sometimes I feel like democrats don’t actually care more about voters, they just care much more about appearances.

  • @kreskin
    link
    English
    421 month ago

    Even out of power they still find a way to give hand jobs for industry donations and casually screw the public. I admire their energy.

  • @SoftestSapphic
    link
    English
    351 month ago

    Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

  • @neclimdul
    link
    English
    281 month ago

    "Man we really got trounced in that election "

    “Yeah we should really work on our image”

    “Yeah. Oh I know! You know how everyone hated that tik tok ban?”

    “Yeah?”

    “Well what if that, but more!”

    “But people hated the ban…”

    “Oh right, no, the movie industry is paying us to do this.”

    “Oh why didn’t you just say so.”

    • @Euphorazine
      link
      English
      71 month ago

      On the one hand, more Dems voted no on tiktok ban

      On the other hand, you can bet any bipartisan bill is not in the interest of the American people

  • @coolmojo
    link
    English
    281 month ago

    If they are not blocking the access to the WHO.is servers you can get the IP address of the site and add it to your local hosts file.

    • @Tangent5280
      link
      English
      31 month ago

      Doesn’t the IP address change anyway?

      • @coolmojo
        link
        English
        21 month ago

        Some do and some don’t. Even if the IP changes, the actual IP address will be shown on the WHOIS site. Alternatively, I am sure that the actual IP address of these sites is shared by non-American users on forums and other sites.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      Just use a VPN service at that point. VPNs also have the upside of your ISP not being able to see you visiting piracy websites.

  • shoulderoforion
    link
    fedilink
    271 month ago

    After the US does this, Europe will be soon to follow guaranteed, then everyone will be trying to pipe through the same VPN exit server in Barbados

    • @gaael
      link
      English
      41 month ago

      We already have site blocking in France.