Summary

Pete Hegseth, Trump’s newly appointed Secretary of Defense, suggested military action could be on the table for securing U.S. control over the Panama Canal and Greenland.

In a Fox News interview, he warned that the U.S. would ensure “freedom of navigation” in Panama, while vaguely addressing Trump’s strategic interest in Greenland.

His confirmation hearing earlier this month raised concerns when he refused to rule out military action.

Critics worry his stance signals Trump’s willingness to provoke conflicts with allies over geopolitical ambitions.

    • @SinningStromgald
      link
      138 days ago

      If don’t have plans already to do that then they should be making them now.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          97 days ago

          In point of fact, one of the core elements of Taiwan’s strategic defense plans is “we will melt our chip foundries to slag with a shitload of thermite and explosives if the CCP invades and it looks like they’ll win”. It’s frankly a great tactic to get other developed nations to give a shit about your sovereignty: underwrite large portions of everyone’s economy.

      • @Maggoty
        link
        77 days ago

        A lot of shipping has actually been going around the long way. Ships are simply large enough that they get more profit from that than from being small enough to fit in the Panama Canal.

    • Drusas
      link
      fedilink
      27 days ago

      It’s too important a source of income for them to do that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        57 days ago

        They would lose the income if the USA invaded anyways making them rebuild it would be a good fuck you

      • @Aqarius
        link
        17 days ago

        Not, like, preemptively. Just have a plan, like how Switzerland is rigged to blow.

    • @P00ptart
      link
      -168 days ago

      That would be far more dangerous to billions of people than you imagine. Because the Pacific and Atlantic oceans are not at the same sea level there. Hence the need for the stages of flooding and draining to go from one to the other.

      • @Machinist
        link
        English
        128 days ago

        Dangerous to billions? I don’t think one ocean empties into the other like pulling a plug in the bathtub.

        • @Maggoty
          link
          17 days ago

          It absolutely would cause a level change. The locks are 85 feet up. So if the lake remains connected and the locks are all opened it would drain out. See? Level change. :)

          But yeah definitely doesn’t work like the other guy thinks it does.

        • @P00ptart
          link
          18 days ago

          Ok, that’s certainly valid. I thought you meant blow the whole thing.

  • @hark
    link
    237 days ago

    If the US went full Nazi Germany and tried to take over the world, could they be stopped?

    • @IndustryStandard
      link
      107 days ago

      Yes fairly easily. They could not beat the Taliban. They could not beat the Houthis. They could not beat the Vietcong. They could not even beat Hamas.

      The US can destroy key civilian infrastructure but beyond that their military is incapable of conquering land and keeping it.

      The US air force is powerless against the unbeatable strategy of digging holes in the ground.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      307 days ago

      The industrial centers of the US are almost entirely within blue states. It is only through the quirkiness of the Electoral College that the GOP continues to exist.

      Trumpler would quickly find himself on the losing side of a civil war.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      187 days ago

      Well, they were stopped by rice farmers in Vietnam, so probably. But then, they were “sensible” enough not to use nukes.

    • Billiam
      link
      13
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      No country could realistically go toe-to-toe with the US military:

      • China might have a larger standing army, but they don’t have the logistics to move them globally.

      • Russia is busy getting its ass kicked in Ukraine, and even if it weren’t its invasion of Ukraine has shown they’re nowhere near-peer to the US.

      • A combined NATO + EU + UK might give it a good go, but not all of them (Hungary and Turkiye obviously) would want to stand against Putin’s agenda like that. Also, trying to oppose the US and support Ukraine would definitely strain those countries as well.

      I think the only unknown variable is, if the US suddenly went all “conquering imperialism” how much civilian unrest would occur? Unlike the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions there wouldn’t be any high-minded moral veneer to hide behind, so would Americans put up with it?

      I am much less optimistic about that answer than I was four months ago.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      67 days ago

      I think so? Much of their might comes from their friends (and the money that they pay them for defense, eg, weapons). It would not be overnight and there would have to be a concerted effort… But on the other hand, Russia survives. So I guess USA would become Russia?

  • @CharlesDarwin
    link
    English
    177 days ago

    Remember all the dumbfucks and Russian mouthpieces talking about how donvict wants peace?

      • @CharlesDarwin
        link
        English
        17 days ago

        Yep. They are being rebooted with MAXWA 5.8.111.2024.01.31 update that tells them “high prices good” because it means brown people will be deported. When they were just whining about how terrible everything was, pre-November.

        Even when the Democrats were trying to do so many things for the 99% in the middle of an economy that had all the indicators of a good one, even if supply chains were wildly disrupted during Covid and even though there were factors like bird flu impacting egg prices.

        But now - these low-info will be trained to love the high prices that donflation will bring.

  • Drusas
    link
    fedilink
    97 days ago

    My first thought is, it is against their oaths for any military personnel to follow this sort of order.

    My second thought is, what can the rest of us do about it if they don’t follow their oaths?