I’ve begun to wonder about this question. There’s nothing implied in the existence of the fediverse that it will include every site, and there’s nothing implied in the existence of every non-fediverse site which would stop them from forming their own fediverse. One could technically say email providers have already achieved this, though this only really applies to email providers which doesn’t make it as useful as the fediverse we know and love. Are there actually other fediverses out there?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    201 month ago

    In multi-fediverse theory, there are infinite fediverses where any and every possibility of fediverse exists.

    • @RizzRustbolt
      link
      630 days ago

      So there’s a version of Hexbear out there that are acual socialists and not facist bootlickers?

  • Hossenfeffer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 month ago

    I’m in another fediverse called Jeremy. He goes to a different school though, so you wouldn’t know him.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 month ago

    Pingback introduced back-linking websites practically forming a network in 2002.

    URLs are a form of linking content, forming a network. Although uni-directional (into one direction only).

    Some platforms integrate into websites and form a form of meta-network of their content or accounts.

    Most recently and popular, the AT Protocol is an alternative generic protocol similar to the fediverse, powering Bluesky.

    • palordrolap
      link
      fedilink
      51 month ago

      Web-rings were also a thing in the mid-to-late '90s before search engines really took off.

      Basically you’d put a banner on your site that listed a site “before” yours in the ring, the one “after” and maybe a “random” link as well.

      Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webring

  • @wjrii
    link
    English
    51 month ago

    Is anything federated with Truth Social?

  • @jqubed
    link
    31 month ago

    Long ago Usenet and BBS networks worked in a manner that we could describe as federated, if you mean a decentralized system where servers could communicate with each other. I saw something a few months ago about a modern service that sounds kind of similar, but I don’t remember the name now. It seemed interesting but I put it in the back burner and then lost it.

  • HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    229 days ago

    Yes. Truth Social is a reskinned Mastodon that only federates with itself. I imagine there are other cases similar to that.

  • @9point6
    link
    21 month ago

    There’s only one fediverse, everyone doesn’t have to talk to each other

    • Rhynoplaz
      link
      51 month ago

      What if a few instances only shared with each other? Wouldn’t that create a second separate fediverse?

      • MHLoppy
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        If a few servers are linked up and talk to each other using TCP/IP (?) but aren’t connected to the wider network, that’s not enough for it to be considered another internet (but it could be an intranet).

        If a few instances are linked up and talk to each other using ActivityPub but aren’t connected to the wider network, I think that’s not enough for it to be considered another fediverse.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 month ago

      Kind of like how some parts of our universe are so far away that they’re physically unreachable.

  • Kairos
    link
    fedilink
    21 month ago

    There are hundreds of other federated systems, yes.

    As per what your question is asking, I’m not sure if there are fedoverse systems branched off from the “main” one. I guess Lemmy/forum stuff can’t really federate with Microblogging-style things.

    • cally [he/they]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Mastodon users can post to Lemmy by mentioning the community they want to post to.