This isn’t my app, it just seems super cool as a way to pull together your own social media and news.

  • @BeefPiano
    link
    English
    41 hour ago

    The interesting thing to me is that you can code and share your own feed sources. This means you can integrate APIs, or even scrape sites.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 minutes ago

      There is no such thing as a lifetime license.

      Any license only lasts as long as the person doesn’t want to alter the deal.

      (Speaking as a sublime text user who got shafted and switched to emacs)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      349 hours ago

      $80 for a lifetime subscription is reasonable for a well developed app without venture capital subsiding the cost.

      Plexpass lifetime is $120.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        117 hours ago

        $60 can buy you a lifetime license for the Affinity Designer 2, which is a fantastic alternative to Adobe’s Illustrator, which some people can’t live without. AFAIK, Serif isn’t backed by a venture capitalist as well. So, are you still happy paying $20 more for a social media app?

        Like, look, I get that we should support devs for what they do, especially if they don’t take venture capitalist money to sell their products for cheap to gain market share. But this seems really overpriced. What are you getting with an $80 app for social media?

        • @acosmichippo
          link
          English
          67 hours ago

          yep, migrated to emby a couple months ago. although I did use plex for long enough to get value out of the lifetime plex pass.

            • @acosmichippo
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              48 minutes ago

              no Apple TV app and smaller QOL things like bulk editing of files.

        • @ccunning
          link
          English
          7
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Ivory for Mastodon is $15/year
          $80 would only buy you 5.33 years

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            38 hours ago

            I’m not paying for Ivory either. Out of curiosity does Ivory have adds for those who don’t pay?

            • @ccunning
              link
              English
              78 hours ago

              I don’t think so but I think it’s “read only”.

    • paraphrand
      link
      English
      14
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Software use to cost this much and much more in the 90s, and often did less (not working with a much of networked api calls, not integrating with a bunch of other platforms, etc) and wasn’t frequently updated.

      It’s 25-30 years later.

      People have lost touch with what paid software costs.

      • I Cast Fist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 hours ago

        Developers didn’t have access to mountains of open source code, online tutorials and stack overflow back then either. Compilers, like Turbo C, also used to be paid products.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      78 hours ago

      I’ve been using Openvibe which is a similar app and haven’t seen one add and doesn’t have a subscription model. I understand development cost money but I agree with you.

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 hours ago

        Openvibe is backed by Automatic so zero chance it doesn’t become shit. But you can just switch when it does, I suppose.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 hours ago

          Just curios what do you mean by become shit? Adds and/or subscriptions or something else?

          • Ulrich
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 hours ago

            Sure, any number of ways they can claw value away from consumers.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I don’t understand who this is for.

    It’s not a good RSS client because it doesn’t offer any specialised features (pulling content beyond what’s in rss, proper reader view, caching etc).

    It’s an awful microblogging platform client because you can’t see context or comments. So then maybe you could set up another account, otherwise you’re going to get every new shitpost in your Tapestry (ewww). Then you wonder why not use this account in Mastodon client when it can be a list and skip bothering with another app.

    It’s not a good YouTube app or whatever else they implement. It’s not going to be a good everything app because better apps exist for individual services and this developer doesn’t seem to have capacity to implement even the basics.

    It does offer some cool features when you have a bajillion news sources but then you’d be kidding yourself that this app will let you browse them all. Maybe you’ll set up some cool alerts for stuff you’ll see elsewhere anyway.

    I might be missing the point but this is really undercooked for what they try to charge.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 hours ago

      Think of “Google News”, but for social media and RSS… Or Google Reader for all of those.

      The point isn’t to be able to comment and whatnot, but to get all the things you want updates on, in a single pane of glass, so to speak.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        135 minutes ago

        That seems like such a narrow use case. I’m not sure why making it usable would have hindered people who want to use it like that.

        Not being able to reply or see threads are just wild design choices IMO.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I understand this much. I tried it and it was awful for the reasons stated above.

        Reeder did a similar rebrand recently and it was similarly received. It looks pleasant (and way better than Tapestry) but doesn’t really stand up to scrutiny (same as Tapestry). I had to switch RSS app that I’ve been using since 1st gen iPod Touch so I’m a bit pissed ;) I understand Iconfactory had to reinvent itself because Musk killed Twitterific but this just doesn’t work and it’s been proven to not work already.

  • @Hafty
    link
    English
    89 hours ago

    Cool concept. Seems a bit pricey for what is essentially an RSS reader. UI looks kind of ugly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      124 minutes ago

      100% although I like the UI but it’s crippled without those features mentioned. Openvibe and Surf offers the same concept and can do both those things.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27 hours ago

    Been beta testing this as a Kickstarter backer for many months and it’s one of my top iPhone apps. Iconfactory has done a real good job and I’ll say that if you like the app, $80 for a lifetime purchase really will pay for itself after only a year of using it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    59 hours ago

    This is great. I’ve really been enjoying OpenVibe but it’s not perfect so I’m looking forward to checking out another take on this.

  • mesamune
    link
    English
    19 hours ago

    Cool. Is there anything like this on android? Or desktop?