• AnimalsDream
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18 hours ago

    Also used to be a Pebble enjoyer. I think realistically though, the world has moved on. There are other projects that carry the spirit of it too. I have a Pinetime, which is not nearly as good admittedly. Then there’s the Bangle.js which I’ve heard is really good. I will probably get one of these in the future because it does seem to be the best candidate as a Pebble successor.

    Then if you have the right smartwatch, and a bit of tech skill, you can outright put Linux on your wrist with Asteroid OS.

  • @BroccoLemuria
    link
    210 hours ago

    Still using my Pebble Time today, I’d love to get a refreshed version with an active store again. It’s still my favorite smartwatch by far, nothing comes even close for me, I kept on thinking maybe I was alone in this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      113 hours ago

      have you actually used other smartwatches? i have a xiaomi smart band 8 and it’s honestly really damn good, especially for costing 80 bucks. Even without a fancy display it has longer battery life than a pebble.
      Only things i miss is physical buttons and more openness in the software, but honestly the only one that actually bothers me is no physical buttons.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2722 hours ago

    I’ve mentioned this before, but I want pebble Smart Glasses. Just a few lines of texts as a heads up display. No cameras, no AR or AI BS, just notifications and text.

    Please.

    • Pup Biru
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1421 hours ago

      zack freedman on youtube created his own, and i seem to remember went through the build process if you’re interested

      it’s not something you’d necessarily wear out, but apparently the utility value is very high

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        919 hours ago

        Just watched a video; he sawed an Epson headset in half & did some hardware mods so it doesn’t know it was sawed in half.

        Also, it’s full video, I just need a little LCD/e-ink display…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    121 day ago

    I would love a round watch that uses an analog face but can still buzz me with notifications and do Apple Pay (or Google Pay). I’ve found ones that meet the first two but not the last one. I use my watch to pay way too much.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      222 hours ago

      Skagen had these kinds of watches with their Hagen line. Ran on a standard battery for nearly half a month. You could set up notification groups so that the watch would buzz and the watch’s hands point to a specific hour.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        318 hours ago

        hang on, standard button cell? if so then half a month is less than stellar, that could get expensive fast!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          213 hours ago

          I researched what kind of battery it was: CR2016, some kind of Lithium battery.

          And boy, what a brain fart: I meant half a year, so six months. It’s been a few years since I used that watch regularly, but I was impressed with the endurance of that little battery.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            17 hours ago

            yeah holy shit that’s actually really impressive. that’d only be like $3 a year if you did the replacements yourself!

  • Ulrich
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 day ago

    I really don’t understand the significance of this. If there were really a market for epaper watches, why did no one make them for the last 10 years? Was PebbleOS really so amazing that no one could replicate anything similar?

    • @Gradually_Adjusting
      link
      English
      210 hours ago

      Fitbit bought them out after they mismanaged their expansion. My pebble kept working, but I lost the charging cable as I recall and couldn’t get a replacement.

        • @Gradually_Adjusting
          link
          English
          19 hours ago

          Sorry, I was being pulled in two directions when I wrote that. Meant to talk about how ePaper watches were basically deleted from the market by Fitbit. They owned the IP and didn’t make any, as far as I know. Now smart watches are a multi billion dollar market that Pebble helped popularize (maybe even created), and Pebble was cast aside. The hardware was so simple, effective, cheap, reliable, and lacking bloat that you could buy one and have it work perfectly for ages. Totally against the trend with tech.

          • Ulrich
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 hours ago

            Totally against the trend with tech.

            Yeah that’s my point. Why would anyone launch them again?

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        09 hours ago

        Right. That’s my point. What’s changed?

        • @keyez
          link
          19 hours ago

          Nothing has, people still want a pebble and nobody has made one in 10 years. this project aims to do that again

          • Ulrich
            link
            fedilink
            English
            08 hours ago

            If nothing’s changed then what makes them think people will start buying them again?

            • @keyez
              link
              14 hours ago

              Nothing has changed with the demand. There always was and has been demand albeit small. I’m going to order one for example

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      161 day ago

      At the time it made way more sense because the “traditional” smart watches were way worse. Not even one day battery life. I would say Pebble still wins on size though - actually normal watch sized.

      As for why they didn’t catch on… Probably a little bit ahead of their time, and also less shiny.

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 hours ago

        Not asking why they didn’t catch on. I’m asking why it would catch on today when it hasn’t since the Pebble died. And why, even if a very small user-base exists for this type of product, no one has made them since.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 hours ago

          A couple of possible reasons:

          1. If it’s a new company with fewer standards then more niche products become more viable. I don’t know exactly what the situation at Pebble was but if they took lots of VC funding they can’t turn around and say “ok we’re just going to trundle along with this niche watch that is loved, but only by a few people”. A small company can do that.

          2. Advertising / brand awareness. Pebble was very well known, but if you make some random alternative nobody is even going to learn of your existence. This attempt is using the actual Pebble code and it’s run by the ex-Pebble people.

          3. Don’t underestimate the software effort. Now that they have most of the code, resurrecting it is a lot easier.

          Having said that, I would probably put my money on them doing a Kickstarter (which will do very well based on nostalgia), delivering a product that can’t really compete with modern smart watches, and then slowly fading into the night. Hope not but I won’t hold my breath. (I can’t really wear watches anyway so it doesn’t really affect me.)

    • @brutalist
      link
      English
      111 day ago

      I would drop my Galaxy Watch in a second if I could get a brand new pebble on better hardware with more sensors.

    • Colonel Panic
      link
      fedilink
      131 day ago

      it’s a niche market, like not enough people wanting to buy a compact sub-5" flagship phone, so i’ll never get one. let people enjoy it :)

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        Oh, don’t me wrong, I will likely buy one. I am the target audience.

        But either it’s a niche market with not enough customers or it isn’t. The OS doesn’t change that.

    • Barbecue Cowboy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 day ago

      The Pebble platform doesn’t make it super easy to monetize itself beyond hardware sales. There’s no reason to make a watch like this from a business perspective. Plenty probably could, but no one with the resources to do it properly wanted to make something similar.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 day ago

      Was PebbleOS really so amazing that no one could replicate anything similar?

      Probably no-one just took the responsibility to start doing it for free. Foss projects usually start from one or couple bored people just really wanting something so bad they’ll start putting big hours to make it real

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -41 day ago

    Kind of a misleading headline. They have a working prototype. Nothing even close to ready to ship.

    • Deebster
      link
      fedilink
      924 hours ago

      I disagree, they have it working on the nRF52840 (which is new and supports new things like NFC and Thread/Zigbee). This means people can start developing features against that chipset.

      Hardware doesn’t mean “production-ready model”.