Summary

The SAVE Act, reintroduced by Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), would require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote, relying on documents like birth certificates and passports.

Critics argue it could disenfranchise millions, particularly married women whose names no longer match their birth certificates. The bill does not recognize marriage certificates as valid proof of identity.

Supporters say it protects election integrity, while opponents highlight the minimal occurrence of noncitizen voting.

With Republican control of Congress and the White House, the bill is likely to pass.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    While you’re being blatant about the hate, how about we give married men 3/5ths an extra vote at the same time?

  • Optional
    link
    147 hours ago

    republiQan women are okie-dokie with this.

    It’s what tiny baby Jesus would want.

  • FiveMacs
    link
    fedilink
    7611 hours ago

    So they do want to end womens suffrage…I’m shocked y’all haven’t physically removed him from his position yet…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      219 hours ago

      It’s a focal problem.

      This is something he could do, and people are convinced he won’t do it, until he does and then they’re pissed that he did.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3310 hours ago

      A confrontation is coming, but the problem is it isn’t just one person but an entire party in power. If it’s as bad I think it will be—and we make it out of this as a single country—we’re going to need de-Nazification laws, but with the Republican party. “De-Republicanification”…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          26 hours ago

          Also embrace deconstruction for some states namely Florida rip up the roots of civilization and give it back to the swamps. The Seminole can have the entire region once its all done.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    179 hours ago

    If my voting rights were stripped by this law, I would know what to do, and who to do it to. I wouldn’t become a secondary citizen (at best), or nothing but a (wage/birthing) slave.

    • @BradleyUffner
      link
      English
      78 hours ago

      When my wife and I were married, we wanted to create a brand new last name that both of us changed to. The legal requirements to make that happen were just crazy.

        • @BradleyUffner
          link
          English
          11
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          North Carolina. There was a requirement to post notices in 3 major newspapers running for 4 weeks. And something about appearing before a judge who could reject the change for any reason they wanted, including reasons like “I don’t like what color shirt you are wearing today”. There were a lot of other requirements too, like background checks, fingerprints, character witnesses, etc.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            47 hours ago

            You should have gotten married in Michigan. My spouse and I could both change are names to whatever we wanted to.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1410 hours ago

      Not changing your last name when getting married can be annoying too (ie. USPS forwarding mail to new address for people with the same surname as you, and the spouse with a different name has to file more paperwork to get their mail forwarded). There are a lot of things predicated on same surname in the US. It sucks.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        610 hours ago

        People can’t change their last name when getting married here (they need to go through the whole process like anyone else wanting to change their name if they want to do it) and it’s such a non issue. Your ID has your address, show your ID proving you live at the same address and they hand you the package.

        It’s just a bunch of problems the US created for itself by not having any actual ID.

        • tiredofsametab
          link
          fedilink
          16 hours ago

          Not exclusive to the US. Japan also has problems with it. When both spouses are Japanese citizens, they MUST choose one of their names to use by law.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            04 hours ago

            Yep but the US never adopted a national ID that makes sense and that’s where it becomes an issue

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -310 hours ago

      I claim we can change our entire name.

      Finally, those kids whose parents named them the dumbest names ever will have a way to easily fix it.

      “No, now it’s just Jennifer, spelled the normal way, and my mom is still ghetto but she isn’t ruining my identity any more.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        29 hours ago

        You can, at least in my state. Most people just change their last name. It’s not limited to gender, either. I could have changed my name to Hahaha FuckYou. My wife insisted I didn’t.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1310 hours ago

    As a Mother I AGREE with all this! Why should me AND MY DAUGHTERS get a say in our Healthcare, Economy, National Security, or Opportunities? And WHY don’t my Adult Kids TALK to me anymore? It’s JOE BIDENS FAULT!

  • baronvonj
    link
    fedilink
    910 hours ago

    I sure hope Obama does a good job explaining the “unintended” consequences of this so the Republicans who vote for it won’t blame him for letting them pass it.