Summary

Elon Musk and Donald Trump’s joint interview with Sean Hannity reinforced concerns about Musk’s influence in Trump’s administration.

During the White House discussion, Musk dominated the conversation. Hannity cut Trump off to follow up on Musk’s remarks, mirroring a similar dynamic at a recent press conference where Musk spoke significantly more than Trump.

Musk defended his actions to dismantle parts of the federal bureaucracy, arguing it was necessary to restore democracy.

His prominent role raises questions about his power in the administration, especially given his substantial financial contributions to Trump’s campaign.

    • Lemminary
      link
      713 hours ago

      I’m so glad he can’t run for president.

      • @HeyThisIsntTheYMCA
        link
        English
        612 hours ago

        I dunno the ussc might rule that since there’s no enforcement mechanism explicitly tied to the limitation in the constitution, it is one of those laws that Republicans can ignore. Like they did with the 14th

        • Lemminary
          link
          110 hours ago

          Damn you’re right, I forgot it was a techbro fascist takeover.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1251 day ago

    When Trump attempted to join in on the answer, Hannity seemed more eager to follow up on Musk’s response, explicitly cutting the president off.

    “Sean, you’re a—” Trump started, pointing at the Fox News host.

    “This is important,” Hannity responded to Trump, raising his hand to stop him.

    Trump must still be reeling from that one

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    “I’d like to also just send a message—like, because, as the president said, like, this—there’s a lot of rich people out there,” Musk said. “They should be caring more about the country because—the reason they should be caring about—more about country is: America falls, what do you think is going to happen to your business?”

    “What do—what do you think—do you think you’re be going to be okay if—if the ship of America sinks? Of course not. Like, what—what I’m doing here, what the president is doing is it’s just long-term thinking. The ship of America must be strong. The ship of America cannot sink. If it sinks, we all sink with it.”

    Okay, sure. But let me ask this: if Biden had had a second term rather than Trump, would ship America have sunk? I don’t think so. I can maybe see some areas where someone who favors Republican policies would say “American might be weaker”, but it seems pretty wildly unreasonable to get from there to “sunk”. Trying to claim some sort of imminent, existential crisis seems pretty unreasonable for pretty much anyone.

    I haven’t paid much attention to Trump’s people speaking to the press recently, but I saw a video the other day from one of his advisor crowd, and he was doing the whole “America has to be saved” thing too, and it was pretty over-the-top.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      5
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Although I voted for Bernie, I have always been pretty sure that if he were elected president, both parties would work against him in congress and the judiciary as well and he would achieve very little.

      But achieving very little is better than what’s happening now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      30
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Forget Biden. Bernie Fucking Sanders could have been elected to 2 consecutive terms starting in 2016 and the US would still , right now, be a highly capitalist society with fabulously wealthy corporations, and basically the same number of billionaires. Americans just might have more affordable healthcare and education, that’s all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        214 hours ago

        And Al Gore in 2000. 9/11 would have never happened and we’d have flying cars that could go through Stargates.

  • @SinningStromgald
    link
    201 day ago

    “They wouldn’t be complaining so much if we weren’t doing something useful,” he continued.

    OR you really are doing something monumentally stupid to a system you dont understand nor taking the time to understand.

    “What we’re really trying to do here is restore the will of the people through the president. And what we’re finding is that there’s an unelected bureaucracy—speaking of unelected, there’s a vast federal bureaucracy that is implacably opposed to the president and the cabinet.”

    You mean the president should be a king and their will law even if it goes against everything the country stands for.

    To late to tax the rich we gotta eat them.

  • AmidFuror
    link
    fedilink
    1022 hours ago

    “[Rich people] should be caring more about the country because—the reason they should be caring about—more about country is: America falls, what do you think is going to happen to your business?”

    Musk not realizing that he and Trump are bringing America closer to the brink than ever through their inept and abrupt actions.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    723 hours ago

    I’d much rather interview Musk than Trump too. I mean, Trump is going to give you a rambling, incoherent response and not in the least bother to make it consistent with what he says at any other point. There’s just not a lot of point in interviewing him. People have interviewed him plenty of times before. It’s awful.

    People who like Trump don’t like Trump because he’s making much of a coherent argument that you can analyze or poke holes in or try to ask for clarification on. They like him because the general gist of what he’s saying is in line with what they want to hear.

    Musk is a lot closer to what you’d normally expect to get when interviewing someone. Like, he’s going to give a real response that you can talk about.

  • @TokenBoomer
    link
    124 hours ago

    … like he was injected with methamphetamine and rabies… projection again