• @uienia
    link
    613 hours ago

    Way too optimistic vision of the future.

  • @scaredoftrumpwinning
    link
    614 hours ago

    I read the first line about a cyber truck in 2039 and I immediately thought they would all stop working in 2038 because they are probably using an int for time somewhere. I’m tired and have my nerd on. Anyone that needs an explanation can be found here.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    651 day ago

    Have a hard time imagining that capital owners would rather pay workers to supervise AI than make the courts look the other way when a self-driving truck creates accidents …

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      At some point it probably becomes more valuable to offer jobs that barely keep people alive than it does to deal with the sheer number of unemployed people who are now ready to burn everything down.

      Then again, capitalism has never been good at externalities.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        23
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I expect a resurgence of jobs like “servant” and “shoe-shiner”. You don’t need these, either, but this way capitalists can lord their wealth over the masses face-to-face.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 day ago

          Not sure they want that face-to-face with people that far below them. Too easy for any one of them to Luigi.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            33
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            This is part of the equation that they’ve proven themselves consistently awful at assessing properly.

            There was this guy who did a bunch of interviews with super wealthy people about their apocalypse shelter plans, and he was like “What stops all the poors from killing you and taking your stuff?”

            And they’re like “Oh, we have ex-Navy SEAL private security details, we’re good.”

            So the guy asks them “What stops the SEALs from killing you and taking your stuff?”

            They were stumped. Not a one of them had a good answer. Like, one guy floated having the only password to the vault where all the supplies are kept, as if Navy SEALs don’t know how to torture information out of someone. Waterboarding was that guy’s best case outcome.

            They really, really don’t understand that they need us, but we don’t need them. And the only thing keeping them alive is that we haven’t really figured that out yet either.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 day ago

            Give it a couple generations of malnutrition and genetic damage. Those lower classes will look like toasters and microwaves. Ez to face.

    • @gex
      link
      131 day ago

      Maybe it could be a single person monitoring 10 autonomous trucks from a remote control center

      • @WhiskyTangoFoxtrot
        link
        319 hours ago

        That would be easier if they attached the trucks to each other.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
          link
          414 hours ago

          Oh, and then they could put them on prebuilt tracks to limit and control their intersections with other traffic!

          • @Jumi
            link
            213 hours ago

            I think you’re on to something

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 day ago

        Bingo. Simply look to the military for the future. Kids sitting in a comfortable location in California dropping bombs on children overseas.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 day ago

      Probably they do both. The paid drivers are a bit of a side-project to get government subsidies for ‘job creation’ and such.

  • @maxalmonte14
    link
    12
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The most terrifying part is people being forced to drink beer instead of water, they’d be dropping like flies because of dehydration.

    • Rob Bos
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Historically, as I understand it, what they would drink would be pretty weak ABV. 2-3%. Barely beer at all. It’d be plenty hydrating.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 day ago

      You can keep hydrated from alcoholic drinks up to around 10% alcohol. Of course you’ll be drunk as fuck all the time is it had more than around 3%.

      • @maxalmonte14
        link
        41 day ago

        That’s truly fascinating, it never occurred to me, but low alcohol beverages could be way safer than untreated water.

        • skmn
          link
          fedilink
          51 day ago

          My understanding is that weak beer was the source of people’s water intake for most of human history.

    • @x00z
      link
      English
      21 day ago

      Seems like a win.