Mozilla has just deleted the following:

“Does Firefox sell your personal data?”

“Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That’s a promise. "

Source: Lundke journal.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    62 hours ago

    Honest question for people in this thread:

    Would you pay a subscription to use Firefox, and if no, what would you propose as a means of sustaining Firefox’s professional development budget if they lose Google’s Monopoly money?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    74 hours ago

    It’s about time the community throws its weight behind a hard Firefox fork. Mozilla has been blinded by Google’s money for more than a decade consistently doing the bare minimum to stay an alternative.

    Anti Commercial-AI license

    • 🅃🅾🅆🅴🄻🅸🄴
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      The LibreWolf Debian repository was down all of last week. I peeked over at their forum and it looks like the team is really struggling to maintain the project since a key member left. Its struggles to keep up with security updates is why its no longer being recommended by Privacy Guides. I’m trying out Mullvad browser right now to see how it fairs

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Hey can you link me to a source where it shows that privacy guides doesn’t recommend it due to security updates slowing down? I cannot find it.

        I was going to use mullvad browser instead, however it wants you to use DoH. If you turn it off, you’re now fingerprintable. This is rough since i use network filter tools and it’ll bypass it if i use doh. So i was gonna try librewolf.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 hours ago

        Oh no, that’s sad to hear. Society really needs to start doing more clever decisions. A project like Librewolf could be so incredibly useful for most of people. Somehow should find a way to foster those efforts.

      • @YarHarSuperstar
        link
        English
        18 hours ago

        In addition to this, can I use my other plugins with it, including side loaded ones? And sync my ff profile with it? I am not okay with having my data used for any reason other than the intended function of the app, and I use ff android a lot.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      58 hours ago

      Does LibreWolf not have a mobile client? The ability to sync with my desktop will unfortunately keep me on Firefox, unless I’m just missing it.

  • @ghurab
    link
    47
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    They removed that question from the FAQ, but it still states in multiple other sections, in the same link, that they do not sell user data

    Am I reading this wrong?

    Edit: New FAQ

    Mozilla doesn’t sell data about you (in the way that most people think about “selling data“), and we don’t buy data about you. Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of “sale of data“ is extremely broad in some places, we’ve had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate, or is put through our privacy preserving technologies (like OHTTP).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      127 hours ago

      I am so fucking tired of PR speak. This is removed now so that they can sell your data later. That and the ToS change is the canary in the coalmine.

      “We akchually don’t sell your data because it isn’t the legal definition everywhere”. Fuck you

    • TheObviousSolution
      link
      fedilink
      7711 hours ago

      Ah, so it’s not that they sell data, it’s that they share data in order to achieve commercial viability. I don’t sell items on ebay, I share them in a commercially viable way!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I feel like it would’ve been really helpful if it had provides an example of something that legally counts as “selling your data”, but that any sane person would not define as such.

    • Dojan
      link
      1212 hours ago

      Marked as deprecated and will be removed outright not to be replaced.

  • gon [he]
    link
    fedilink
    6112 hours ago

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    OK, Mozilla, I’ll use a damn fork, since you insist! WTF…

    • @fartsparkles
      link
      3511 hours ago

      I’m kind of worried about the knee jerk reactions from people that haven’t read the full communications from Mozilla or looked into their approaches to anonymise data (which they’ve done for years as part of analyzing new feature tests).

      Building an application as complex as Firefox requires full-time developers. It’s similar in scale to the Linux Kernel.

      To keep building a competitive browser and continue to challenge there ubiquity of Chromium, Firefox needs to exist. Mozilla need to figure out how to make money (their previous attempts at additional services like VPN etc didn’t have much impact). If Google pull the rug from under them regarding their payments to be the default search engine, Mozilla could swiftly fall under.

      Advertising, done in a privacy preserving way which they’ve an awful lot of experience at doing, in the near term gives them additional revenue streams to keep the ship afloat.

      If we lose Firefox, Google owns the internet. We need to keep talking with Mozilla, not abandon them.

      • gon [he]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2911 hours ago

        That’s fair, but I think not totally right.

        I think Firefox is a great browser, which is why I’m using forks, not ditching it entirely. I still use Mozilla services, and I will continue to keep tabs on and support the development of the browser. However, I will not sacrifice the little privacy I can scrape up by agreeing to terms of use that gather my data, even if anonymized, for use in serving me ads, regardless of whether I think the company behind these practices needs to exist or not—and in this case, I do think Mozilla, and Firefox as a project, must remain strong if we want a free internet for all.

        This implicit trust you seem to have in Mozilla, however, is not something I share. First, AI integration, then it’s the terms of use, then it’s the language around data privacy… Google used to say “Don’t Be Evil.” I don’t believe Mozilla will stay good because it’s Mozilla and it’s been good. I don’t like the recent steps they’ve been taking, and so I’ll stop using Firefox; that’s as far as it goes.

        Maybe I’m being unreasonable, but I don’t want to compromise on this.

        • @fartsparkles
          link
          12
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          I don’t think you’re being unreasonable and in truth I share your concerns. Forks are doing a good job at refining the experience but should the Firefox project collapse, I doubt any fork can meaningfully continue the development needed for such a huge and complex project without the full-time and experienced development team who have been working on the project for an incredibly long time.

          I wish Mozilla could figure out a more powerful way to generate revenue that doesn’t require advertising in any form.

          I wonder if a yearly fundraising drive like Wikipedia could help. They generated $250Mil+ last time they did.

          • gon [he]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            69 hours ago

            should the Firefox project collapse, I doubt any fork can meaningfully continue the development

            Yeah, that’s probably right, unfortunately.

            I wonder if a yearly fundraising drive like Wikipedia could help.

            I doubt it would hurt, at least! They do get some money, <$20M… Which isn’t close to being enough, of course, but it does prove there’s at least some interest in supporting Mozilla financially, on the users’ side.

      • @anyhow2503
        link
        1111 hours ago

        We need Mozilla corp to be better and there is currently no good way of forcing that to happen.

    • RedSnt 👓♂️🖥️
      link
      fedilink
      610 hours ago

      That’s a good way of putting it. I feel like some of us might return to monkey and just use gopher again, reject the corpo bullshit ways of siphoning every ounce of data out of our existence.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3612 hours ago

    I’ve been using Mozilla since version 1.0, and have gone through the highs and lows. This is the point where I get off, what a shame.

    • @basic_user
      link
      3312 hours ago

      Get off to what? Everything else is chromium based. Or do you have a tip?

  • @zecg
    link
    2012 hours ago

    So, it’s Librewolf and IronFox on mobile.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    711 hours ago

    What a shame. I tried waterfox for the first time and I got a good first impression. Will probably switch to it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1310 hours ago

      In December 2019, System1, an advertising (paid notice) company that claims to be focused on privacy, bought Waterfox. In July 2023, Alex Kontos said that Waterfox is an independent and separate project again.

      I’m rather unsure about what is truly going on behind the scenes, but my trust in them is far to find…

      Source

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4412 hours ago

      To some extent they have changed the wording, as clarified here: https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b61939b7f4310eb80c5470e#commitcomment-153095625

      Saying the new wording is:

      “Mozilla doesn’t sell data about you (in the way that most people think about “selling data“), and we don’t buy data about you. Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of “sale of data“ is extremely broad in some places, we’ve had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate, or is put through our privacy preserving technologies (like OHTTP).”

      Which seems to be because of the legal definition of selling data. Note this quote is now live on their privacy FAQ: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/faq/

      However, this part:

      We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable)

      Sounds an awful lot like straight up selling our data. It would be nice to have specifics. The privacy FAQ page doesn’t seem to actually provide clarity.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1611 hours ago

        Yeah, specifics would be great. “Someone clicked this ad”, or potentially even “someone in Germany clicked this ad” is a big difference from “a 20-year old man who likes blahaj in Hamburg has opened a new tab”.