Title. If none - why?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17 hours ago

    Microsoft is “generally competent,” according to O’Callahan

    Sorry had to DQ the article cause of that /s

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    211 day ago

    None, because they typicially open up a larger attack surface than the system would have without them. It’s been like that for a while now. For references, I’d recommend this article from Ars Technica, who reference some very knowledgeable people (including Chrome’s Security Chief at the time).

    There was a time when AV software was useful. We’re a decade past that, the world has changed, software has changed, defenses have changed, and AV software did not keep up.

  • Shadow
    link
    fedilink
    131 day ago

    Windows defender on Windows PC’s. Nothing on Linux.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      213 minutes ago

      My antivirus for Linux is a policy of not executing things as root and installing things via safe channels when possible.

      If I’m setting up a server or other untrusted service, I create a user specifically for it that has very limited permissions.

      This makes it so that when something is compromised it is still trapped in a box and can’t spread.

  • Max-P
    link
    fedilink
    41 day ago

    What would you run an antivirus for? I trust the software I out on my servers, if I didn’t I wouldn’t be installing it or at the very least would put it in a VM.

    I have real security boundaries in place, no need for useless scareware.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      3 minutes ago

      In my competitive industry I often have to install half baked software often written without security in mind and written by folks from all over the world that I’ve never met

      Nothing gives white knuckles like piping a curl output to bash because your boss says to try out a program their friend found and you don’t have time to audit anything.

      Though your point still holds. If you are careful you can do this with relative safety in Linux. Windows makes it harder tho

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 day ago

    None. I won’t install something that checks the whole system, but maybe a tool something that checks installed packages or container images against some known cve database and alerts me if it has findings.

  • @JoeKrogan
    link
    4
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    On my debian server, I have trivy to scan containers and I use clamav to scan files now and again but clamav uses up a lot of ram and its not a mailserver so I’m planning on uninstalling it.

    On desktops I use virus total to scan PDFs or small files and stick to foss software

  • Matt
    link
    fedilink
    222 hours ago

    I have my server behind NAT and I use Tailscale to access it from elsewhere.