• @Brkdncr
    link
    English
    21 hour ago

    I’m unexpectedly excited and hopeful for risc-v

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    116 hours ago

    Regardless of the outcome I just hope this doesn’t lead to more tribalism in software again. The FOSS community needs to stay strong on an international level whenever it comes to hardware integration etc.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    719 hours ago

    ARM is a UK-based company. If they hadn’t dropped out of EU, it’s possible they would have settled on an ARM-based supercomputer design.

    Chalk it up to another WIN for Brexit!

  • @mlg
    link
    English
    138 hours ago

    China:

  • @someguy3
    link
    English
    26
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Can anyone knowledgeable tell us if this is feasible, practical, or a good idea?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 hours ago

      With tariffs and sanctions, it has become clear that open standards which can’t be controlled by governments are what is needed.

      With what’s been happening over the past few years, there will be a lot of interested in this. Recently, I’ve seen lots of news about it, but that could just be the algorithm.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      259 hours ago

      Feasible, yes. Practical, hard to say. Good idea, yes.

      RISC-V is open-source architecture based in Switzerland (although it started in University of California).

      One thing going for it is China is spending billions a year towards RISC-V adoption so they do not get sanctioned by the US. You need money and engineers working on it towards these type of open source to compete with existing players.

    • Beej Jorgensen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2610 hours ago

      I’m not knowledgeable enough to answer, but I know China’s also going big on RISC-V.

      • TheTechnician27
        link
        English
        3810 hours ago

        The great thing about RISC-V if you care about sovereignty in an age where CPUs run the world is that it’s an open standard. Contrast this with x86 which is owned in some part by US-based Intel and some part by US-based AMD as well as ARM which is owned by Japanese-owned, UK-based Arm Holdings. If you want to use x86, you’re shelling out license money to Intel and AMD, and if you want to use ARM, you’re shelling out license money to Arm Holdings. You never truly “own” what you’re producing.

        • @hemmes
          link
          English
          15 hours ago

          This is the way

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 hours ago

      Considering that you can buy some Raspberry Pi micro computers (these are ARM architecture computers) for less than €100 that are performance competitive with a lot of existing hardware; this idea would make a ton of sense for Europe to implement. I think Europe could probably start designing and manufacturing chips locally within 2 to 5 years on the low end 5 to 10 years on the high end.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 hours ago

        It helps significantly that the EU already has a lot of the necessary expertise at every level.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    510 hours ago

    lol those are dram chips in the stock photo.

    (more risc v investment away from the us is a good thing though!)

    • @qqq
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      What’s the give away there? Not doubting just wondering.

      I see impedance matched traces so seems like something fast, but that’s all I’d be able to guess.

      • Mohamed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 hours ago

        The connection also looks like a RAM stick’s. I think.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod
    link
    English
    19 hours ago

    Anyone else remember when Phil Schiller bored the Macworld expo to death explaining why RISC was better than CISC?