• @MadBigote
      link
      46 hours ago

      Which was… A couple of weeks ago… Smh

      /S

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      26 hours ago

      Wrapping Mayor Adams in a big cocoon and dangling him from a lightpost would be such a vibe right now

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I like the idea that all Spider-man films are just remakes of the first Sam Raimi one, like that production company who only had the rights to make Bond as long as it was Thunderball.

  • @[email protected]B
    link
    fedilink
    3724 hours ago

    It’s because the contract sony signed with marvel back in the day stipulated that they must create a new Spider-Man movie every few years or lose the rights.

    The contract specifies two key production windows:

    Sony must start production within 3 years and 9 months after the previous film’s release They must release the next film within 5 years and 9 months after the previous film’s release There’s also an important exception: if Sony releases three pictures within eight consecutive years, they can extend these deadlines to 5 years for starting production and 7 years for release

  • @Evotech
    link
    1221 hours ago

    To busy remaking fantastic four

  • unalivejoy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    641 day ago

    Yeah, it’s only been 2 weeks since the Spider-Man Disney Plus show.

    • @soycapitan451
      link
      18
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      My 7 year old likes it. I can watch it without wanting to gouge my own eyes out. 2 thumbs up.

    • @But_my_mom_says_im_cool
      link
      11 day ago

      I saw that cartoon on my feed and it looks like the most unnecessary, almost exact copy of the Tom holland version, but in cartoon. Why? Nothing new and it just uses the same aesthetic as the movie

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        191 day ago

        Its a different story overall, and just to say its actually much better than I was expecting.

        The character designs match, but it is absolutely not the MCU story. Norman Osborn becomes Peter’s mentor, not Stark, which should speak to how different it becomes.

      • @danc4498
        link
        English
        71 day ago

        I’ve watched part of it and really enjoy it so far. To say there’s nothing new I don’t think is right. It presents a lot of classic Spider-Man tropes and intentionally swerves them.

        It got solid reviews on IMDB, which is usually how I judge the worthiness of shows.

      • @MimicJar
        link
        51 day ago

        Nothing new

        It’s 99% new and different from the MCU. The 1% are small nods to the MCU.

        For example in both Peter is out and finds a broken DVD player, then he brings it home and tells May how excited he is that someone threw away a perfectly functioning (obviously broken) DVD player. All the while missing that his future mentor is on the couch, talking to May.

        Or as the series progresses we learn that certain events that occured in the MCU also exist in this world.

        Overall however it is a completely new Spider-Man. (Yes, Spider-Man interacts with well know Spider-Man characters, but not following any previously written story.)

      • Yeather
        link
        fedilink
        21 day ago

        It was originally going to be Tom Holland’s Spiderman origin story, but was changed to be its own canon.

          • Yeather
            link
            fedilink
            31 day ago

            I think it would have been interesting, but the showrunners decided to use characters not in the MCU and the movie people probably didn’t want to be locked into a design choice used in the animation.

  • @son_named_bort
    link
    1624 hours ago

    We also haven’t had Spider pig in a movie in a long time.

  • @Duamerthrax
    link
    823 hours ago

    They’re busy with their current Fantastic Four remake.

  • MeatPilot
    link
    English
    141 day ago

    I need someone else to give me the “With great power…” speech as they die.

    • @TexasDrunk
      link
      31 day ago

      Since at some level we’re all dying, I feel like I can safely tell you that with great power there must also come – great responsibility!

      Or were you looking for “Remember, with great power comes great responsibility” from the movie?

      Or possibly “All power corrupts, absolute power…” “… is even more fun” if you prefer old school BOFH to Spider-Man.

  • @But_my_mom_says_im_cool
    link
    7
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They will give it a generic Hollywood oversize overused buzzword name like, Spider-man Rising or i spider-man. They love naming movies that shit

  • @finitebanjo
    link
    6
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The reason they do this is because of licensing contracts. They have to use the rights or lose them.

    It’s also why Batman doesn’t show up in TV and Movies lately, Disney has the rights because they purchased Fox even though WB owns the character.

    READ YOUR CONTRACTS, CHILDREN.

    • @MimicJar
      link
      21 day ago

      Batman is a DC character, not Marvel. So Disney doesn’t own them.

      Batman had a live action film in 2022, with a sequel in production.

      Batman cameoed in an animated TV series earlier this year.

      Batman had his own animated TV series on Amazon last year, with a second season planned.

      Batman appears in animated films about once a year.

      • @finitebanjo
        link
        4
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        If you’re talking about the flash cameo, many fans were quick to point out that it had its ears digitally removed. That wasn’t BatMan. That was Man.

        20th Centurt Fox owned the televised rights to Batman, meaning without permission from Disney there are no new televised appearances of him. Even the Batman animated series were on Fox.

        I think even Teen Titans original series excluded Batman.

        There are different rights and types of ownership for these things. One person can own the merchandising rights while another owns the rights to distribute media.

          • @finitebanjo
            link
            1
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            Oh James Gunn made a four word tweet about it? That totally convinces me. Thanks for that. /s

            You can come up with as many examples as you want, examples of times they had permission, but the fact remains that studios go far out of their way to obscure batman, digitally alter his appearance, or exclude him entirely. So this rumor won’t die that easily. Truly the dark knight, brooding in the shadows just out of frame.

            • @MimicJar
              link
              121 hours ago

              I know you’ve said you’re not convinced… But then you also called it a rumor that won’t die?

              For Creature Commandos here is a whole interview where James Gunn says Batman again and again. He has made creative decisions to limit his appearance, but it’s 100% Batman.

              If course that article isn’t even 100% correct best we actually see a dead Batman earlier in the same series as part of a premonition.

              Also James Gunn isn’t just “some guy” he’s the Co-chairman and Co-CEO of DC Studios. This isn’t Kevin Feige having to drag out Amy Pascal or Sony Everytime they mention Spider-Man. This is a clear statement.

              Disney does not control the rights to Batman. MAYBE they have some residual rights to older content, but nothing recent.

              • @finitebanjo
                link
                116 hours ago

                I feel like you’re stuck on loop with these examples where batman makes an appearance or reference but I’ve already explained to you so many times that this can happen in the theory I presented but they require permission to do it.

                DC is owned by Warner Bros who is a competitor (in the most uneven sense possible) to Disney which owns Fox who from the 1960s to at least the 1990s owned the rights to televise Batman.

                • @MimicJar
                  link
                  016 hours ago

                  My point is that they don’t require permission anymore. Disney does not own Batman in any of his recent work. Batman can pop up anywhere and anytime and Disney does not need to OK anything, they are not involved.

                  So the argument that the reason we don’t see Batman on TV and movies recently is because of Disney is false. Both because Disney is not involved and because yes, yes we have seen him on both big and small screen recently.

                  There are no existing articles to support the idea that Disney owns/controls current day Batman.

                  There are rumors that they do, but even those rumors confuse things like the Gotham TV series airing on Fox having anything to do with who owns the rights to Batman. For example as I stated earlier, an animated Batman show ran on Amazon, that doesn’t mean Amazon owns the rights to Batman either, just those specific streaming rights.

  • lost_faith
    link
    fedilink
    41 day ago

    I wish they would stop remaking these stories, just keep the story line going and change actors along the way as they age out. How many people actually care about which actor is playing the hero this movie?

    • @madcaesar
      link
      121 hours ago

      Ummm a lot? The actor makes such a huge difference.

  • DistressedDad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 day ago

    It’s been a couple of months since the new animated “Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man” came out. Maybe they’re out looking for an even younger Aunt May?

    • @Shipairtime
      link
      11 day ago

      If she gets any younger we are going to run into the really 600 years old anime problem.