I really enjoy archlinux so I was thinking on downloading garuda gaming but I’m unsure if that’s the way to go. What distro do you guys use? Have you encontered many problems with it?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      +1 most differences between the common distros are package manager, de, and some defaults only so in theory they are all the same (yes I know some use musl or no systemd but that’s besides the point).

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    201 year ago

    You enjoy Arch but you’re thinking of getting another distro based on Arch for gaming?

  • RQG
    link
    131 year ago

    I found the distro really doesn’t matter much anymore for gaming specifically. You’ll install the same or similar tools for gaming no matter if using Arch, Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian etc.

    For gaming it sometimes can be useful to have more current Software especially if playing new games since issues might only be fixed on the latest version.

    But aside from that one part I think you should go with the distro you generally prefer and game on that.

    • @alehcOP
      link
      11 year ago

      Do you have any specific tools/software I should install?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      It will matter if your packages are so out of date that you can’t run any games on it. Had this issue when I used KDE neon what uses an Ubuntu LTS release

  • Coolcoder360
    link
    101 year ago

    I’ve used arch for 7-8 years. I’m currently using Garuda for gaming, on year 2 or 3.

    My recommendation is that if arch is working for you just fine, then don’t bother switching. I only switched because I had a breakage and it seemed time to switch (only 2 significant breakages in those 7or 8 years)

    If you hadn’t started with arch I would in fact recommend Garuda first because the initial setup is much more hands free, start it and install stuff and it just works. Also Garuda comes preconfigured with an AUR setup and installers for that and for the glorious egg roll proton.

    That is all crap you can simply set up yourself on arch, so there’s no need for you to switch, if you’re fine with the arch and slightly more manual configuration then you’re all set with arch and have no real reason to change that.

    • loopgru
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Seconding this. Garuda has been great, all of the advantages of aur and bleeding edge with some fool proofing and ease of use features. It’s like pop_os for folks who don’t want to jump on the Ubuntu train.

  • Vuipes
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    I prefer Linux Mint, but I don’t believe there is a “best” for gaming; simply select the one with which you are most familiar.

  • Spannungsabfall
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    I’m sure u only wanted to tell us, u are using arch linux. You wouldn’t switch OS only for gaming. Jokes aside, I would rather switch from nvidia to AMD instead of using another Distro. I use arch btw, for gaming and music production.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    I use Mint for my main gaming PC. Most things worked out of the box.

    On my previous laptop everything worked out of the box, I jus had to install the nvidia driver. On my newest one the GPU required a newer driver than what was available for my kernel, so I had to experiment with various combinations of kernel and driver combinations before I found something that worked well.

    I settled for kernel 6.0.0-1018 + nvidia 535.40.03 for my rtx4060.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    I use Mint for gaming with a 6.1 oem kernel and kisak-mesa drivers. Works great, super stable with no issues. Most stuff has an Ubuntu LTS release, for everything else I use Flatpak.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      +1 from me. Fedora is a nice middle ground - stable, polished, yet adopting new things fast.

    • Kabe
      link
      English
      01 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • @alehcOP
      link
      61 year ago

      Why flatpak Steam?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Flatpak includes all the libraries Steam, proton, and games need to run, sandboxed and without having to mess with the ones installed more generally on your system. Can help prevent headaches and compatibility issues.

  • eleanor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    It doesn’t really matter as long as you’re on something with recentish packages.

    I’ve been on Arch for the past year or so and it’s been working pretty well.

    I’ve used openSUSE, Void, Fedora, Debian, and Ubuntu in the past for gaming and they’ve all been decent.

    I’m just on Arch because I wanted a newer kernel and graphics drivers than Debian.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Gamed for years on Arch, few problems diminishing over time. Currently gaming on Kinoite immutable (with Arch in a distrobox) with even less problems and a (touch wood) virtually unbreakable system. Then again, I never went chasing those last few percent…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve had really good luck with Pop!_OS. AMD CPU and NVIDIA GPU, so having the NVIDIA drivers bundled is nice.

    Most games in my Steam library work out of the box with no tinkering of Proton. I’ve lucked out in that the games that do require tinkering work with Proton Experimental or Glorious Eggroll’s releases. Lutris is the same, though I just default to the latest Glorious Eggroll release.

  • Hairyblue
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    I built my Linux gaming PC with 23.04 Ubuntu. It has kernel 6.2. Easy to install. Uses my Xbox and PS5 controller. Runs great with my Nvidia graphics card.

    But you may want to try a few different distro and see which one you like.