• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “WONT SOMEONE STOP THIS DYSTOPIAN NIGHTMARE OF BEING ABLE TO SIGN UP FOR A BETA THAT IS ACTUALLY A BETA AND REQUIRES ACTUAL DATA COLLECTION (THAT I CAN ACTUALLY OPT OUT OF IF I DONT WANT TO PARTICIPATE) TO ACTUAL DO ITS ACTUAL BETA JOB OF IMPROVING THE SOFTWARE?! SKREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!11one!1”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Ah yes, it will stay a Beta for ever and data collected will always be only for improvement. This is 100% sure, tech history has always been this way. There is no possible way to turn this otherwise.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          “I’m just gonna ignore the fact that I can opt out with a single click, and continue to be a dick about it, because admitting I’m wrong is not something I am willing to ever consider”

    • @DrinkBoba
      link
      -21 year ago

      Thing is, there are alternatives but people settle for cheap and convenient. Lots of people hate Apple because of some odd contrarian marketing reason. Apple doesn’t do this. Linux is another option. Both are hugely better for regular people than Windows.

      • @harsh3466
        link
        English
        45
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Let’s be fair. Apple doesn’t do this quite so blatantly and egregiously, but they do it. They collect plenty of telemetry, and it’s getting harder to opt-out of/block it with their own chipsets.

        Edit: I say this as an Apple user.

        • @something_random_tho
          link
          131 year ago

          Mac even had special rules so firewalls (including Little Snitch) couldn’t block access to Apple’s own data collection servers.

          • @harsh3466
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Yeah. That’s some real bullshit. As soon as I can get functional Linux on my M1 Mac mini, I plan to.

        • @nomadjoanne
          link
          121 year ago

          Yes. A lot of Linux folks hate Apple because they are every bit slimey as Windows but hide behind a veneer of respectability due to higher-end nature of the market they target. So a bunch of yuppies shill for them.

          I have an American cousin who refuses to contact me on either WhatsApp, Signal, or Telegram (I gave him three fucking’ options) because "I only trust Apple with my contacts list "

          Ok, well I’m not spending a euro-per SMS, so we won’t casually chat from time to time. Goodbye.

          I might be a bit jaded.

          • @DoakSteezy
            link
            21 year ago

            Bunch of people I know (as an American) use Signal and Telegram along with iMessage. Your cousin sounds like a pretentious dickhead

            • @nomadjoanne
              link
              11 year ago

              Bingo! He’s a New-York-based cinematographer. You hit the nail on the head. 😂

              • @DoakSteezy
                link
                31 year ago

                Haha, the duality of the NYer. I’m also a NYer but upstate.

          • @harsh3466
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            Yeah. Apple is super slimy. They just hide it better. I’d like to move away from Apple entirely, but I’m kinda stuck right now. I can’t afford to just get rid of perfectly good phones and tablets to try and replace them with better privacy options.

            I do what I can to protect my privacy on apple devices, but I don’t trust them at all.

            • @nomadjoanne
              link
              11 year ago

              I don’t blame you. I’d definitely choose apple over Windows at least on the desktop side of things. You get a Unixy experience and their UI is pretty good.

              I am still a Gnome user mostly because the interface is Maclike and I came to Linux from the Mac world.

              That and as far as phones and tablets go, your options are really limited if you want to go the custom ROM route. ARM is horrible in that each SOC needs its own custom kernel. A very different world from x86.

              • @harsh3466
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                The tablet and mobile limitations really suck. I edit my photos on my iPad, (and privacy issues aside), I love the iPad for this, and don’t have any plans to abandon it.

                I’d consider a pixel with graphene, but not until the phone I have dies/is unusable.

  • poVoq
    link
    fedilink
    411 year ago

    Windows drivers only.

    If you are on a spyware platform, what can you expect otherwise?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    Can you imagine some marketing firm contacting intel to pay for the user data scraped by their customers GPUs?

    Like how is that real.

  • @TheMadnessKing
    link
    61 year ago

    The fact that Nvidia has been doing this for ages without opt-out (afaik) makes Intel look more humane in comparison.

  • Raltoid
    link
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There might be some bias involved based on the third paragraph:

    The good news is that users can opt out of this data collection by deselecting it during the installation process. However, the process isn’t too straightforward either unlike AMD, which explicitly asks the user whether they want to opt out of data collection. Nvidia, however, enables and installs its Telemetry components by default and users are unable to opt out of it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        To me, the article title is biased clickbait because it implies Intel is worse than the other GPU options. But Nvidia has been doing the same shit for years.

        But I’m not the person you replied to.

    • macniel
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Uh by stating how it is during installation of beta drivers from the competition is bias?