In an unprecedented raid Friday, local law enforcement seized computers, cellphones and reporting materials from the Marion County Record office, the newspaper’s reporters, and the publisher’s home.

  • Arotrios
    link
    fedilink
    801 year ago

    Man, the ACLU is gonna have a field day with this one. And Newell should be charged with making a fake police report:

    The search warrant identifies two pages worth of items that law enforcement officers were allowed to seize, including computer software and hardware, digital communications, cellular networks, servers and hard drives, items with passwords, utility records, and all documents and records pertaining to Newell. The warrant specifically targeted ownership of computers capable of being used to “participate in the identity theft of Kari Newell.”

    She’s claiming that because Meyer did research on her, he’s participating in identity theft. Great job at keeping this story out of the papers, Newell, now everyone knows you’re a drunk-driving criminal with no respect to for the rule of law or freedom of the press. Welcome to the Streisand effect.

    • roguetrick
      link
      fedilink
      54
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It wasn’t just her. What happened was the paper said the police knew she didn’t have a license and gave her a pass. The cops decided to punish the paper for calling out their corruption. Everything else just flows from incompetence, from the attorney general’s office to the judge.

      • @QHC
        link
        271 year ago

        The coverup is always worse than the crime.

      • Arotrios
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        I hear you there - there’s plenty of dumbfuckery laced throughout this story. I just wanted to draw out that particular piece of stupid in my comment, because it’s clear that this drunken trash heap of a human being is the root of the entire brouhaha.

          • ArtieShaw
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            That’s a good find. Unfortunately for that chief, he seems to have a talent for lighting his problems on fire instead of burying them. What could have been a quiet little small town scandal blew up to become national news. Good work, chief!

            And the greatest irony to me is that the newspaper reported on NONE of this. OK, they did cover the story where Karin went off the rails and aired her own dirty laundry at the town council meeting, but it’s not like that was any sort of secret.

  • FuglyDuck
    link
    551 year ago

    Meyer reported last week that Marion restaurant owner Kari Newell had kicked newspaper staff out of a public forum with LaTurner[US rep], whose staff was apologetic. Newell responded to Meyer’s reporting with hostile comments on her personal Facebook page. A confidential source contacted the newspaper, Meyer said, and provided evidence that Newell had been convicted of drunken driving and continued to use her vehicle without a driver’s license. The criminal record could jeopardize her efforts to obtain a liquor license for her catering business.

    So, the beef was that they posted an unflattering- but true- article about somebody that was hosting a thing for a politician. Gotcha.

    The search warrant, signed by Marion County District Court Magistrate Judge Laura Viar, appears to violate federal law that provides protections against searching and seizing materials from journalists. The law requires law enforcement to subpoena materials instead. Viar didn’t respond to a request to comment for this story or explain why she would authorize a potentially illegal raid.

    The answer is obvious, isn’t it? politicians leaning on judges to protect supporters from criminal action.

  • @money_loo
    link
    541 year ago

    More of that “try that in a small town” stuff, huh?

    • @Zella111
      link
      401 year ago

      You aren’t kidding… “The city’s entire five-officer police force and two sheriff’s deputies took “everything we have”"

  • kitonthenet
    link
    fedilink
    43
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hey everybody, it’s Happening Here. This is what it looks like. “It can’t happen here” is bullshit you’re watching it happen

    Death to the bastards!

  • uphillbothways
    link
    fedilink
    271 year ago

    That’s some crazy bullshit. If there was any justice at all the FBI would show up, arrest the police force responsible and return the stolen property. But we all know none of that is going to happen.

  • roguetrick
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I just don’t understand the motivation to bootstrap such a ridiculous farce. This drunk driving Karen obviously doesn’t have the power to move a magistrate, ag, and an entire police force for bullshit claims of identity theft. There has to be very very serious levels of incompetence here. Magistrate signing without looking at warrants. AG drafting illegal searches. Officers following nonsense orders. Both the sheriff and the head of the police department authorizing illegal seizures?

    Edit: NOW I know the motivation. It’s because the paper said the police KNEW she didn’t have a license but gave her a pass. The paper made the police look like corrupt idiots, so the chief of police go the attorney general’s office to write an warrant and the judge blindly signs whatever the AG sends their way. That police chief should go to jail.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      14
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      a sitting US representative does have that clout… Marion County, Kansas, has a little more than 10 thousand people. For comparison, the suburb I live in has just under 70 thousand.

      it doesn’t take a lot of clout to get a county magistrate to do something in a podunk county like Marion. LaTurner did a favor for one of his supporters.

    • LanternEverywhere
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s silly, i don’t want to live in a modern society without police. I don’t want to abolish the police, i want BETTER police than the ones we have now.

      • @QHC
        link
        111 year ago

        Do you believe the current version of policing in America can be successfully reformed? Can the current officers be sufficiently re-trained? Who is going to patrol the streets until that happens?

        When people say abolish the police, they are saying that the current system has to be entirely dismantled and replaced. You actually appear to agree with the end objective.

        • LanternEverywhere
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          If that’s what they mean then they’re terribly miscommunicating, because they’re literally saying something completely different.

          • @QHC
            link
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Not really. “Abolish the police [as they currently exist]” is just step 1.

        • @Breezy
          link
          11 year ago

          I think we should keep police as police, but start a new agency something like peace proctors or something. Phase out ready acces guns for the police, they can be in an eclctonicly locked box in their trunk as a last resort. Then make their only priority issueing tickets.

          Have the new units patrol and respond to dangeous situations but not allow them to issue tickets. I feel with the correct training to defuse problems and being held accountable to the new creed of keeping the peace would do some good. Of course some police will try to switch to maintain their rage hard ons of power, but when they pull the same shit charge them with derelict of duty and fire them with fines or jail time depending on what they done.

        • @Burn_The_Right
          link
          11 year ago

          It can. Every act of oppression, bigotry, racism, homophobia, xenophobia and misogyny comes from one particular profile of cop. Conservative. Remove conservatives from policing and those issues stop almost completely.

          There are a few good cops and every single one of them is a progressive.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -31 year ago

            While we’re at it would you guys like to be in control of the military, schools, and the media too?

            • @Burn_The_Right
              link
              7
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Only if there is a problem with oppression of vulnerable groups in those places.

              Conservatives can’t resist oppressing vulnerable people. That’s just who they are at their core.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              11 year ago

              No, I would like them to not be in control of the military, schools and the media. There’s a difference.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Exactly. Employ educated police, gotta be less likely to do dodgy crap because they’ll have a proper understanding of the laws. Also, why is it an elected position? You’d think that’s gonna make it a prime motivation for corruption, just make it a position assigned based on experience and knowledge.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
        link
        11 year ago

        Yeah we would still have that. They just wouldn’t be called police anymore. I used to think it was hyperbole to say that every police agency in the US traces it’s origins to slave patrols, and now I realize that it is true.

        The entire notion of policing, armed people reacting to crimes, catching criminals like cat and mouse, is what is broken. It doesn’t reduce crime, it makes more. It breaks families and communities. And what do we get in return? At best, we get to make a criminal feel extra bad by putting them in jail for a long long time. That model must end.

        There will still be a reactionary force to call when warranted. But the force that responds when shit hits the fan and the force you call when you’re in a fender bender don’t need to be the same thing. Virtually every police call can be better handled by health and welfare services. Building affordable housing reduces the crime rate. Teaching people skills reduces the crime rate. That’s what the police force should be aimed at. But no, we have cat and mouse.

  • JJROKCZ
    link
    41 year ago

    Have they given any reason why they did this? Seems like there needs to be a damned good reason for seizing the assets of the press

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So. the article explains, briefly. The newspaper (Marion County Recorder,) peeps got into what’s basically a pissing match with a local restaurant owner (Kari Newell) because said restaurant owner kicked the newspaper peeps out. They had “confidential” information, from a source, that they published, statign that the restaurant owner was driving illegally… she lost her license as the result of a DUI/DWI charge at somepoint and continued to be driving.

      The cops were probably “looking for evidence” of the “Stolen” confidential files.

      The issue here is that journalists are allowed to protect their sources and that courts/lawyers/cops are supposed to subpoena documents- a process where the journalist turns over the requested documents- as apposed to what they did: which was to get a warrant from the judge, and then conduct a search and seizure.

      a large part of this is, in point of fact, that the journalists have done nothing wrong- receiving confidential information like this is not in fact illegal. it may have been illegal for whoever took it, but at this point they’d probably have an excellent justification for whistleblower status- because this entire affair strikes me as Small-Town-Corruption at it’s finest.
      (and lets be honest here. I doubt very much any of that was actually confidential. court records like convictions and such like are public information. and you have no expectation of privacy driving down the road. people can just follow you.)

      the other issue is that with a warrant, you can only search things specifically cited in the warrant associated in the crime. clauses like “and anything else related to the crime that we happen to find” aren’t allowed. if they genuinely seized everything… they over stepped and violated due process.