• @PBJ
    link
    English
    175
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • knoland
      link
      fedilink
      441 year ago

      I’m at Cannes Lions rn. There’s a ton of of the Reddit marketing team here overhearing their conversations with advertisers.

      Lemme tell you, that place was doomed to start with.

        • knoland
          link
          fedilink
          47
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They just have no idea what value the site brings to their actual users.

          Essentially, pushing a Reddit as a recommendation engine for “organic brand evangelists” instead of organic community communication.

          I’m gonna swing by their booth tomorrow and report back.

          • Anomander
            link
            fedilink
            24
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I think I’d say that’s consistent with a direction they’re trying to send Reddit, for all that it’s inconsistent with where Reddit is now.

            I think some of the current fire over there is actually aimed at winnowing the hyper-engaged members of the community who are hobbyists and niche interest specialists - and then exchanging them for ‘influencers’ who are not amateurs, but who have an external financial incentive to maintain spaces, continue engagement, and to toe Reddit’s line.

            An ongoing remark during the blackouts noted that a whole ton of niche google searches went dull after the reddit portions of the results subsequently bricked. Reddit’s niche communities are where people online are going for organic product and service recommendations - people needing advice on products don’t search for review sites anymore, they go to reddit discussions. And I think they’ve realized that the influencer space on IG or similar is exceedingly lucrative.

            If they can leverage their own platform’s prominence to either boost-for-fees organic influencers or seed dialogue via AI-piloted accounts, that turns into an alternative way of monetizing their placement and niche online.

            If they manage to drive off the hyper-engaged community members who might counteract those seeded recommendations, or recapture communities from real organic hobbyists and similar - they can offer key spaces in niche communities with retail importance to both the companies and the influencers (“organic brand evangelists”) as a monetization angle down the road.

            If you have any way of getting their pitch to prospective partners on record somehow, that would be absolutely fantastic.

            • @rolaulten
              link
              141 year ago

              While I think you might be onto something - I think this only works for consumer focused goods/products/services. Large language models can seed “what car should I get” type conversations - however they have a tendency to be confidently wrong. And in industry specific communities being confidently wrong (especially when attempting to influence a b2b sale) can lead to all kinds of negative ripple effects.

              • @Aceticon
                link
                31 year ago

                Being confident whilst caring not one jot for being wrong or right is the essence of selling in modern society, especially when it comes to ideas (especially Politics).

                Large language models are great at producing text with all the correct subtle details to trigger the reader’s subconscious feeling of “this is somebody who knows what he’s talking” with zero of the subtle details that make people suspect the writer is unsure of what he wrote or even deceitful (in a way, LLMs are the perfect sleazy politician).

                That said, I do agree with you that amongst expert domain specific communities populated by people who have actual domain knowledge, assured delivery of bullshit doesn’t go far. It will, however, very likely go far in the more generic communities which seem to, at least individually, have the most subscribers, so an “influencer” strategy selling to “consumers” (so, B2C not B2B) might make sense if most of the population of Reddit are non-specialists using it as a “Portal to the Internet”.

                • @rolaulten
                  link
                  21 year ago

                  So under this hypothesis, reddit becomes a trove of B2C bots/influencers attempting to pitch outrage/ dopamine (and the occasional consumer good) while letting the professional communities die.

                  This begs the question - how much of reddits traffic is composed of said technical (as in deep knowledge in a field not tech) communities? Furthermore how much of reddits value prop to large language models is said technical communities (as a source of training).

              • Anomander
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                While I think you might be onto something - I think this only works for consumer focused goods/products/services.

                That’s not really a huge limitation when you consider what Reddit’s primary demographics are.

                There are very few B2B deals being worked out on Reddit at the moment, but there’s massive amounts of consumer decisions made on any given day, all of which are aided by the discourses taking place on Reddit.

                People who are qualified to participate in large-scale B2B aren’t getting buying tips from industry communities on Reddit. People who are just entering that grouping, or are in over their head, or are hobbyists looking to go pro … that’s who is taking buying tips from random community discourse or asking for help picking what X to buy. The people who do not have the experience to screen the “confident-sounding but wrong” answers are effectively the only ones who are asking for that sort of help.

                I don’t think this angle even needs to use language models or AI - just exchange current hobbyist mods and/or key contributors with influencers selected by the campaign relevant to that community. If you have already driven off the hobbyists who might check their inputs, then they have free space to seed responses and sculpt impressions.

                The other key factor is that in many cases, you aren’t necessarily facing questions about “right” or “wrong” per se - but matters of highly subjective opinion. If your selected influencers are recommending your hardware that’s not technically that much better or worse, but isn’t a proven brand or is marginally better - the average consumer taken in by the astroturf is never really going to see a cost associated in a meaningful way.

          • @lich_hegemon
            link
            71 year ago

            I was afraid they were trying to turn Reddit into TikTok. Turns out it’s worse, they are trying to turn it into Pinterest 🤢

    • MrBlahOne
      link
      fedilink
      251 year ago

      I hope reddit’s IPO burns so hard that spez’s golden parachute catches fire.

      • bobalot
        link
        131 year ago

        I think they have left their IPO too late.

        The 2nd internet boom is entering a bust.

    • Timwi
      link
      fedilink
      211 year ago

      I hope more that it loses them profit rather than users. I suspect that they will lose users, but only users who weren’t going to drive profits anyway. The IPO is going to go ahead and the investors are going to have a field day while the website becomes terrible for the users.

      • Meepster
        link
        fedilink
        261 year ago

        Well, they’re losing one advertiser - me. I was about to start an advertising campaign on Reddit when this all went down. Just pulled the plug on it. At this point, keeping my Reddit ad will be bad for business with my client base.

        Not sure where I’ll advertise instead, but definitely not there.

        • BenGFHC
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Sounds interesting, are you able to tell us what kind of thing you’re advertising? Is it something small or is it like a company thing?

        • @Tired8281
          link
          11 year ago

          You are wise. I’m looking into moving away from Dashlane after many years because they are doing am AMA on Reddit tomorrow. Just cost them $40.

          • @Evono
            link
            21 year ago

            i can honestly not recommend enough bitwarden , great password manager , cheap , you can even selfhost if you want to.

            • @Tired8281
              link
              11 year ago

              Yeah, that’s probably where I’m going. So much of this drama has been good for me, overcoming inertia to move to better things.

      • @Arbiter
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        The problem is the free users are creating the content that profit generating users are consuming.

        Without that content those users will leave for the next social media startup.

    • chiisana
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      I think this will be the true litmus test. There’s clearly a lot of us concerned and have mostly moved on, but we are probably a minority… The rest of the larger user base, I wonder how much of them will just move back to official apps after Apollo/RIF cuts off service after July 1st, and then observe the outcomes. Part of me really want to see the site go way of the dodo, but part of me thinks they’ll linger around like Twitter does, and eventually they’ll acquire new users that doesn’t know/care for anything beyond what the royal court has to offer.

      • Teknevra
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        @chiisana @PBJ I’m surprised none of the 3rd party apps have either tried finding a similar app like Reddit and redesigning their app around that, or try to create their own Reddit alternative, I mean, they DO have the infrastructure to do it, (especially Christian), they would just need to shuffle things around and tweak their apps a bit.

    • @gimlithepirate
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      I wish he’d release Apollo with a lemmy backend. I know the dev for RedReader is working on it, though his priority is figuring out Reddits new terms for non-revenue accessibility apps at the moment.

    • @Dexies
      link
      English
      -9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Uhhh 95% of users use the official Reddit app, they won’t even notice. Saw it on cited chart the other day.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        It’s not just users to users.

        Third party app users are likely some of the most engaged users Reddit has, so if or as those users find a new home, the overall content quality on Reddit declines and lurkers shift their attention elsewhere.

        And keep in mind, it’s not Reddit v. Lemmy. It’s Reddit v. Netflix, Instagram, TikTok, etc because Reddit is competing for attention.

        • @GrandMoffFartin
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          This is really it. There are people who create content and then there are casual browsers. I personally browsed reddit casually for years before even commenting and then actually posting. I could look at it on my lunch break or something but I didn’t have the time to really get into it, and there are a lot of people who are exactly like I was. It’s also just a little intimidating for new people to take that leap because it feels like you’re going to be torn apart.

          During the time that I was just browsing, I would frequently encounter dips in quality. Like nothing actually worthwhile was happening. Nothing I wanted to click on or engage with, so I’d just bounce after a minute or so. I pulled up Reddit in an incognito browser yesterday and it was exactly like that. Modern day facebook level content was weaved all through the front page.

          I honestly cannot think of a dumber move by a company than this. This is Circuit City div-x dvd player level dumb. Not even the debacle with Cricut approaches this.

      • LUHG
        link
        English
        151 year ago

        I call bullshit on that stat. Apollo alone had 20m downloads and add in all the other apps from before the official reddit app.

      • @Arcaverium
        link
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I always used the official app because I couldn’t be bothered. Still stopped using it because I won’t support this shit.

  • @Dark_Blade
    link
    English
    951 year ago

    Poor Christian, going through all that shit just because spez is jealous about him having a better product.

    • Zana
      link
      fedilink
      221 year ago

      Imagine if instead of all of this he worked with Christian to understand why his product is better.

      • @dustyData
        link
        171 year ago

        You’re asking too much from an egomaniac.

      • @Dark_Blade
        link
        11 year ago

        That would take humility and a functioning brain.

  • @twentyfumble
    link
    English
    541 year ago

    All third party app developers have been calm, reasonable, professional and level headed through the entire process.

    • @kwot
      link
      English
      221 year ago

      deleted by creator

  • @savjeeOP
    link
    English
    411 year ago

    I think Reddit’s CEO is making a fool out of himself by how he’s managing this situation. I think however that the solution is very simple and straightforward.

    Let’s start: I can understand that Reddit has costs to operate the platform. I also get that they don’t want big companies to abuse the API to train ML models and profit of it. Fair game!

    But why not offer a generous free tier for regular users? Say, every user gets 500 free API calls per day. Regular users stay within the free tier, while big companies can’t do anything meaningful with only 500 calls per day (so they end up paying money).

    Seems pretty straightforward to me. Everyone happy! Many other companies offer generous free-tiers for exactly this reason. Am I missing something?

    • @HollowNotion
      link
      English
      321 year ago

      Am I missing something?

      Yeah. They want to kill the third party apps so everyone has to use the ad-supported Reddit app.

      • @zeppo
        link
        English
        10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not clear why they don’t just serve ads in the API and require them to be displayed, or implement profit-sharing with 3rd party devs (as in, they pay reddit a portion of their income from ads/subscriptions). The only clear reasons would be for control and to pump up numbers for the IPO.

        • @ijeff
          link
          English
          71 year ago

          They’re likely more interested in control than revenue.

          • @Squizzy
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            It’s got bespoke tracking and mining. Fuck that shit app and spez

        • @DarkWasp
          link
          English
          5
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @savjeeOP
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            Good point. They wouldn’t be able to see what posts you’re looking at and how long. However, they would still see all the posts you interact with (upvote, comment) and build a profile based on that data. Surely that must be enough to serve somewhat relevant ads?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          From a silo-based business plan’s perspective, that doesn’t make sense. Why would you invest time and effort in supporting someone else having direct access to your users? Better to just nuke all the third party apps, and regain full control. The users are just a nuisance, never mind the third party app developers.

      • @savjeeOP
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Valid point. My proposed free-tier would make them no money. However, by charging a reasonable amount of money for the API, they could make way more than they are right now. Christian noted that Reddit makes about $0.12 per user per month. If they would charge say $0.99 for an average user, they’d have to run no ads and make 8 times more money per user than using their own app.

    • @phr0g
      link
      English
      281 year ago

      I still believe that the ML companies “argument” is just a giant smokescreen. Reason is simple: ML companies can, and probably always have, just scrape the website. Why build an integration for every API under the sun if you can just build a web crawler once and be done? There are even existing, free implementations available so that’s an absolute no-brainer.

      It’s about killing independent clients, nothing else.

      • @EfreetSK
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        Actually when I think about it you are absolutely right. The ML argument is complete bullshit. I mean to train a ML algorithm an API is nice but scraping should do just as fine. I don’t know how complicated the Reddit API is but you essentially need just GET so I guess not that much. How much time would a development team need to switch the implementation from API to scrape? A week? We’re in corporate world so let’s say a month with all the corporate bs around. That’s still nothing

      • The dogspaw
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Maybe he’s so incompetent that he honestly doesn’t know that machine learning companies don’t need api access to do what they do

    • @zeppo
      link
      English
      261 year ago

      My impression is they’re being disingenuous, for the reasons you say. They could easily support 3rd party apps but ban large-scale data mining. Saying “supporting these apps costs us money, so we need to charge” is a manipulative half-truth. Like Selig said, they’ve priced it not just at covering their costs but making a healthy profit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        They priced it to destroy third party apps. There is no other reason for doing it the way they did:

        • very expensive, suspiciously like Twitter, with no basis in real cost or a revenue model based on 3d party clients.
        • a very short timeline so app developers have no time to implement the change
        • claiming that 3d party apps were never the intended use of the api, which is a blatant lie.
    • @nucleative
      link
      English
      261 year ago

      Reddit could let users access the API like this easily. They could stream ads along with the comments coming from the API. They could let individual users pay a subscription fee for their own api access. They could develop an advertising platform for 3P apps to show reddit ads.

      They could even have said: look, we’re going to kill off 3P apps because we have another idea now, thanks but you are no longer required. At least that would have been a genuine approach.

      Spez evidently has an idea about what he really wants and isn’t sharing it yet. I’m sure it will be clear after the IPO.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        They looked at the numbers, concluded that 3d party apps were a fringe phenomenon that could threaten their control over the platform, and just killed them.

        There are many possible revenue models that include 3d party apps and a more open API, Reddit just isn’t interested. They see Twitter as a shining example for some reason.

  • @fsk
    link
    English
    371 year ago

    There are lots of mistakes Reddit made that shows they aren’t trying.

    • They could have given more advance notice for the API price increase. This would give apps more time to update their code to use fewer API calls. Many apps are subscription-based, so it would give them more time to update their subscription price.

    • The price should have been based on Reddit’s actual costs, actual revenue, and actual profits. I.e., if it costs Reddit $0.10 per user per year and their revenue per user is $0.15 per user per year from ads, then the API price should have been $0.15-$0.25 per user per year. The actual pricing shows they made it artificially high to kill the 3rd party apps. (I don’t know what the actual numbers are.)

    • Even if Reddit really did want to charge $5 per month for API users, the right way to do it is to start from a lower price and increase it 20%-50% per year until they get to their target price.

    • If a user had Reddit premium, they should have been given extra API call tokens they can give to their 3rd party app.

    • @sensiblepuffin
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I believe I read $0.24 per 500 1000 API calls somewhere, which is insanely high.

      • @fsk
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        It is insanely high, when their actual cost for 500 API calls should be $0.001 or less.

        • @sensiblepuffin
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          My girlfriend, who has been somewhat on the fence about the protests (just because she’s a more casual user and has never had any issues with the official app), absolutely balked at that number and I think that singlehandedly changed her mind about the API changes.

      • @zeppo
        link
        English
        -3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        $12 per 50,000,000 calls is the figure Selig mentions.

        Oops, I left out the letter ‘k’.

        • @sensiblepuffin
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Typo? This Ars article claims it’s $12k per 50M calls and Christian’s original post has $0.24 per 1000 calls listed, which adds up.

          The price they gave was $0.24 for 1,000 API calls. I quickly inputted this in my app, and saw that it was not far off Twitter’s outstandingly high API prices, at $12,000, and with my current usage would cost almost $2 million dollars per month, or over $20 million per year.

          • @zeppo
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            Oops, of course I did mean $12,000, yes. I had said $12 per 50,000 and somehow edited it to be incorrect.

            • @sensiblepuffin
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              All good, I misquoted it at first as well :)

    • @samus12345
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      Yup, this shows they aren’t interested in finding a balance between making the website a good experience for the users and profitability, they’re just trying to min-max squeezing every last drop of monetization from the users they can. Even then, they could have been smarter about it.

      • @fsk
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        I’m not sure it’s even max monetization. If they said “For $2/month, you get no ads and you can give your favorite app 10,000 calls a month.”, that probably would have been more revenue.

    • @Koof_on_the_Roof
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      Could they have differentiated pricing between apps that helped build / give back to the community and API requests which were just harvesting data?

      Alternatively they could have milked the community more effectively by slowly boiling the frog as more effective companies and governments do.

      Slowly ramp API prices over a period of time so the apps die off and most user’s begrudgingly accept the changes without a cliff edge which leads to protests and a mass exodus

      From a personal point of view I am pleased for the nudge I needed to move out of corporate social media.

      • @fsk
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        That’s pretty standard licensing. “If you’re using the API to train an AI model, the price is $100. If you’re making an app for regular users, the price is $0.01.”

    • Drunemeton
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      I think a smol problem here is that Apollo offered a “Lifetime Subscription” for a flat amount. In order to honor that Christian would be obliged to take money from elsewhere to cover those subscriptions, potentially for decades.

      I’m a lifetime subscription holder and I would have, without a doubt, been fine with having my flat amount cover a few months of the new model, then switching over to the per month amount needed to keep Apollo running. But that wasn’t even offered!

      He just decided that he’d had enough and pulled the plug.

      • @Anonymous0573
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        I don’t blame him, he’d have to start over on his project he’s worked on for years. I wouldn’t want to do it either lol

        • Drunemeton
          link
          English
          -51 year ago

          No, he wouldn’t. He’d have to start passing on the cost of the new API pricing + his fair share as dev, to the users of Apollo. Nothing about how the app currently functions would have to change, just the amount users pay to use the app under the new pricing.

          He never even offered that as an option. (Not that I’ve seen or been told by him as a subscriber.) He apparently decided that doing so wasn’t worth it and pulled the plug. And to be clear, as the app developer that’s fully his right and I support his decision.

          I’m old enough to know that sometimes in life you’ve just “had it,” and it’s time to walk away.

          • @kroy
            link
            English
            9
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            he said some of his busy users would cost $15-20/mo. That’s definitely too much for most people for something like this

          • @samus12345
            link
            English
            81 year ago

            It’s crystal clear that Reddit wants 3PAs gone. No point trying to work with them when they’ll be making it an uphill battle the whole way.

          • @ultranaut
            link
            English
            61 year ago

            Besides the pricing, the other big change is that NSFW content will no longer be available via API. It’s been kind of overshadowed by everything else, but even if the pricing was reasonable, how the app currently functions would still be changing.

          • @GredAndForge
            link
            English
            51 year ago

            I feel for him too.

            I think one of the big issues for him was monetary liability. Even if he did pass the API costs on to willing users, he still wasn’t going to be making much -if any- more money.

            It’s kinda like somebody offering you $1 to get a $20 bill across the street safely - vs - someone offering you $1 to get $20,000 across the street safely.

            If something went wrong with the $20, then no big deal. But if something went wrong with the $20,000, then oh shit. A dollar isn’t worth that headache.

            Same thing with Apollo going completely sub based at $5 or $10 a month. If something was slightly off about his accounting or API call guesstimates or anything else, he could easily be on the hook for tens of thousands of dollars that the subscription fees didn’t cover that month or quarter or year.

            I would’t be able to sleep like that.

            • Drunemeton
              link
              English
              31 year ago

              Very valid point. Thank you!

          • @Anonymous0573
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            I think I misread the comment, I thought you were asking why he doesn’t just make an app for Lemmy. Sorry, just woke up

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Reddit has charged this in such a way that it makes 3rd party apps unsustainable to run - no point offering something that isn’t remotely competitive.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            He explained that 30 days was not enough to design and roll out a whole new pricing scheme, and he would have to start paying the increased fee for all his existing lifetime subscribers, in the hopes that enough people would subscribe to the new schemes to offset the cost.

            A change like that is not something you undertake lightly.

      • @zeppo
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        I think the writing is on the wall that the days of 3rd party reddit apps are numbered. I ran a moderately successful site from an API one time (Etsy) and we were always waiting for them to somehow screw us over. It happened here and there (sudden feature discontinuation, reliability problems) but they never 100% declared “you have to stop”, even when we were doing it before they had an official open API. But We knew they -could- do that at any time and it made it feel shakey. I think he’s right to quit now and cut his losses vs. keep working on it and become more dependent upon reddit.

      • @Tuss
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        The bigger problem is that Selig and other developers have an actual conscience and understood that the pricing for the new model would be way too high (in the ballpark of $20-$25 per month per user) to even cover the costs.

        Not only that but he would lose around 2m per month in the rollover while ending life time and long term subscriptions bringing up the costs another 250k. Just to change it to a model that very few would pay for.

        Instead he decided to cut losses, terminate the subscriptions and not owe 2m per month.

    • @possiblylinux127
      link
      English
      01 year ago

      Honestly they could’ve just make third party apps only available to premium users.

  • kratoz29
    link
    English
    361 year ago

    So wholesome to see that reaching on top of r/all

      • kratoz29
        link
        English
        91 year ago

        For real man, I used Boost then Sync, both are great Reddit apps and I hope the devs get here eventually.

        The Reddit app sucks balls hence I’m not going to use it ever.

        • Exusgu
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          I really don’t understand how a company like Reddit can deliver such a stuttery mess of an app. Forget about the ads, sure I get that, but the level if quality of the third-party offerings is so much better.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            These tech CEO’s are dumb as fuck as proven by Elon - dumb leadership leads to dumb decisions which leads to poor execution. Source: work for a company with dumb fuck leadership.

          • @samus12345
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            When it comes to the quality of a product, developer passion beats just being paid for it every time.

      • @TurnItOff_OnAgain
        link
        English
        81 year ago

        LJ posted today on his sub to guage interest in a lemmy version of sync.

  • @heliumlake
    link
    English
    311 year ago

    It’s wild how quickly reddit went from being beloved despite some missteps to an absolute pariah on the internet.

    • @focusedkiwibear
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      all it takes is one jamoke to turn the whole onion patch sour(er)

  • @CannaVet
    link
    English
    281 year ago

    All these big brain assumptions about Reddits actions, but it’s far more simple.

    He’s taking Musks advice to making a platform profitable, so they’re going to drive costs down by chasing off all the pesky users providing value then monetize the rest by catering to terrorists for $8 a pop

    • joshinya
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      My grandparents could probably monetize Reddit more effectively than that twerp.

  • TragicNotCute
    link
    English
    231 year ago

    That was the first time I have been on Reddit in a week. Fuck that place.

  • MrBlahOne
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    spez can fuck himself. If he was on fire, I wouldn’t piss on him to extinguish the flames because it’s not fair to make the urine exist in proximity to that miserable fucking waste of oxygen.

  • @focusedkiwibear
    link
    English
    201 year ago

    i wish i could give christian my support but i’ve completely nuked all my accounts on Reddit and don’t even go there if I can help it. poor guy - what the heck did he do to deserve this turn of events?

    • @tylerthehuman
      link
      English
      181 year ago

      from the original post

      Not to turn this into an infomercial, but that is a lot of money, and if you appreciate my work I also have a fun separate virtual pets app called Pixel Pals that it would mean a lot to me if you checked out and supported (I’ve got a cool update coming out this week!). If you’re looking for a more direct route, Apollo also has a tip jar at the top of Settings, and if that’s inaccessible, I also have a [email protected] PayPal. Please only support/tip if you easily have the means, ultimately I’ll be fine.

    • Midou
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      They don’t even plan to scrape the website, so libreddit might eventually die. To be fair i think that would be a great way for me to stop lurking at reddit and look for answers and solutions elsewhere in the end.

  • @kinther
    link
    English
    151 year ago

    Slam dunk. Reddit is purposefully doing this. Given everything I’ve seen it’s obvious they are trying to kill 3rd party apps to generate more ad revenue on their own 1st party app.

  • @elghoto
    link
    English
    141 year ago

    Would it be that difficult to make Apollo work with Lemmy? I’m not a fan of Jerboa, but it is what it is and I’m thankful for it…

    • @Aeoneir
      link
      English
      21
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sync is being rebuilt for lemmy. It’s definitely possible but it’s less of a conversion and more of a brand new app that looks and acts similarly to the original from what I understand

    • @rarkgrames
      link
      English
      111 year ago

      Christian’s words were it would be a “gargantuan” effort. From what he’s said in interviews / posts etc. I’m not sure he actually wants to rebuild it for another service. It’s a shame as it’s a fantastic app, but every endpoint for every action would need to be re-written, tested etc. and of course, Lemmy and Reddit don’t always have like for like feature sets anyway, and the APIs could be vastly different. Essentially he’d be re-building the app from scratch.

      • @walktall
        link
        English
        81 year ago

        He also said he’s been pretty burnt out with everything going and he just doesn’t know if he has it in him right now. And I totally get it. Dude deserves a break.

    • @overlordror
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      I’m really hoping some of the reddit devs are interested in helping out the people who were most loyal to them. I use Boost on Android personally, but I would be willing to buy another version of the app that is designed for the Fediverse. I’d pay double what I paid for the reddit app, just to support the active developer of my app.

      • @elghoto
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        I used vanilla app…but I’m willing to pay for a nice app to handle the fediverse.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Depends on the app. For Mastodon, Ivory was quick on the heels of Tweetbot, but I believe it was already in the works and the implementation might’ve been simpler.

      And tbh, in the case of Twitter there was more time between Musk’s takeover and killing off the API, whereas Reddit is breaking records in how quickly you can estrange your user base.