• [deleted]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trump has an extra bonus detail which is he co-opted a planned anniversary parade and made it about himself. He stole the attention from the people who had planned their own celebration back when he wasn’t even in office.

    He went to someone else’s birthday party and made it about his birthday just because they shared the same date.

    • NocturnalMorning
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      Was the parade supposed to be about the 250th anniversary of the creation of the army?

        • kautau
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which is part of why he’s butthurt it had eras of military technology instead of the classic dictatorship parade of “we moved all of our functional armor here so the oppressed citizens are more fearful about who is oppressing them”

          • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, “The soldiers were all smiling and waving at the crowd! They were supposed to look fierce and intimidating!”

            • kautau
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah and even better that most of them basically ignored him at the end of the parade. None of them want to be a dictator’s servant

        • Buddahriffic
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          (Agreeing with you but adding relevant information)

          Hitler did come to power after trying to lead a (potentially) violent coup Mussolini-style (but it was stopped, in part due to incompetence of the nazis) and his trial for that gave him a platform on the world stage that increased his popularity. And then he wrote Mein Kampf while in prison.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like this should also count as a military parade cause all other descriptors I have for it are more embarrassing

    • Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not so much a show of force as an excuse to march in silly hats. There’s a lot of legitimate flack we can take but this is just being goofy

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The hats were made famous by a legendary Fr*nch regiment. When that regiment was given a damn good spanking, the British captured the hats, and started wearing them to taunt the Fr*nch.

      • rwtwm@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but these are often accompanied by us flying all of our military aircraft over London. I think the analogy holds, even if ours is a bit eccentric.

    • Karjalan
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Calling her a world leader is a stretch though.

      • wpb
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        You underestimate how old of a bag she was and how large the British empire was before it fell. Plus, if the Kim fam is on the list, then she sure as hell belongs there too, as well as mr inbred sausage fingers.

    • d00ery
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      In his defence, he’s not a world leader but a symbolic figure head and this is a tradition going back a long way, similar to the French parade but they got rid of their king a while back.

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, an important distinction is that the king/queen didn’t decide to do this, it’s a tradition going way back.

      • jaupsinluggies@feddit.ukBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Norks Kims are world leaders and KC3 isn’t? Did I accidentally stumble into a .ml echo chamber?

        On looking at the OP’s list I was also wondering why Trooping the Colour wasn’t on it, as it is a military parade for the (official) birthday of one of the leaders in the G7.

        King Charles III is not symbolic; he is the ruler of the UK and the Commonwealth. He refers to Parliament as “my government” in his speeches and no new laws can be passed without his approval (Royal assent). He is the head of the military and the Church. So referring to Charles as a symbolic figurehead is factually inaccurate. Deferring power to Parliament doesn’t change that. Taking it up again may cause a constitutional crisis, but I believe it is an option.

        This seems like a fairly reliable source, on the grounds that although it’s “only” a blog, solicitors aren’t known for posting misinformation. https://www.milnerslaw.co.uk/could-king-charles-iii-dissolve-parliament/

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dissolution of Parliament is a thing that happens every time an election is called. It’s not about taking control of Parliament, as an election must be held, and Parliament retains its dual sovereignty.

        • d00ery
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, technically this is correct and the legislation has not been repealed. I think it highly unlikely that the king would do anything, and if he did I’m unsure the armed forces would follow him against a legally elected parliament.

          Futhermore the king is also head of Canada, Australia, and New Zealand; again I find it unlikely that they’d follow him over their govts.

          In short there’s a bunch of laws that the UK govt. hasn’t revoked. Changing unused or unnecessary legislation takes time and there are more important changes to make.

        • d00ery
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did Charles go to the G7 summit, or did the prime minister (leader) of the county go?

          Of all the leaders who attended the G7 summit, are they all elected officials?

  • NABDad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re the same picture.

    • GraniteM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not exactly. Except for numbers 4 and 9, they’re all dead.

  • Treczoks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely spot on. An illustrious club of similar-minded people. He perfectly fits in. I hope he feels at home…