• Lt. Worf, son of Mogh
    link
    fedilink
    1791 year ago

    I think this is an example of what people say in surveys being drastically different than what they’ll do in reality.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      641 year ago

      Today’s phrase is “garnish your wages.” If their protest doesn’t involve moving to another country it’s not going to happen. I’ve thought about it too, but my contingency,for that definitely involves moving to Scandinavia.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        38
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ah bullshit. Civil rights weren’t achieved by threatening to leave and not be the oppressor’s problem anymore, they were achieved by standing ones ground damned the consequences. No one wants to be a martyr, but that’s how battles are unfortunately won, especially against today’s brand of fascists.

      • @PeterPoopshit
        link
        18
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The US government: let’s enable the economy to get to the point where it’s basically impossible for young people to even participate in society.

        Also the US government: damn, why do people keep going on suicidal mass shootings? If only there was anything we could do about it.

        • @CADmonkey
          link
          41 year ago

          I’m so glad you’re willing to sponsor people who want to leave the US, when can I expect the check?

          • Zuberi 👀
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            Read my other comments on it. You can get well more then enough to move from the gov (unemployment/food stamps/etc)

    • @DietBajaBlast
      link
      91 year ago

      Exactly, they’d be ruining their credit scores.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Ppl need to know that student loans (federal or private) and medical related debts don’t impact your credit scores nearly as much as say private loans, mortgage, auto loan, etc.

        • @quicksand
          link
          91 year ago

          People who want to buy a house…

          • @Hazor
            link
            151 year ago

            Most of them are never going to be able to afford a house.

            • @BURN
              link
              101 year ago

              Can’t even rent without a credit score a lot of the time

            • @quicksand
              link
              51 year ago

              Right so we should ruin their credit scores so it gets harder to rent (yes rental agencies check) or buy a car (even if they get one, their interest rate will be super high). Better we just fuck people over since they can’t afford a house, right?

              • Discoslugs
                link
                41 year ago

                Fr

                My credt score is not a choice. Its something i have to deal with.

                • @quicksand
                  link
                  51 year ago

                  Ok so I’ll move to Ireland, since they speak English and I could keep my job I’m sure I’ll have much better luck renting there XD. Go away troll

                • Discoslugs
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  I have family here asshole. Im not leaving my nieces.

                  You’re a coward for even thinking that is a real option for most people.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    69
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m just confused as to why it’s all fine and dandy that PPP loans were all forgiven regardless of the corrupt practices used for disbursement, but student loans, which impact the economy as a whole far more than PPP ever will, is a must repay.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      281 year ago

      A lot of wealthy people benefited from PPP loans including House and Senate members, that’s why.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      Because Republicans will fight so that the rich can get richer by getting handed free money, and Republican will fight so that the working class has to pay back every cent.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          The opposite is the truth. If Republicans were as supportive of student debt reform as Democrats were, we would have a major reform bill of some form passed and signed. Maybe it wouldn’t be cancellation, but interest free student loans would probably be a thing.

          Democrats may disagree and aren’t universally behind cancellation, but didn’t have enough votes by themselves anyways to make anything happen. Biden tried to enact his personal proposal through executive order, but that got shut down by Republican justices.

          So. No. It’s not a both parties thing. It’s one sided. And if you aren’t willing to tell the truth about that, then I have to wonder about your motivations and what you seek to do.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Dems aren’t your friends but the GOP is fascist and we don’t vote for fascists ever. So slag off with the slander.

            You can work with people who aren’t your friends towards some goals. You can’t ever work with fascists who want you dead.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Well one big difference is that PPP loans were a one time thing, they are gone now and not coming back for a very long time.

      If you paid off all student loans today, there would be more tomorrow, and every day after that. If we do it once, we basically have to keep doing it until school is completely paid for and student loans are no longer a thing.

      Forgiving student loans just has a much bigger and longer lasting financial obligation than one time PPP loans.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The problem is that we never bothered to create a system where free education would actually work.

          Producers always like to sell their goods for as much as they can get. Normally, a consumer looks at a product, decides if it’s worth the price and then either buys it or doesn’t. If prices are too high, producers are forced to lower them to stay in business.

          The current system essentially created a 3 way business transaction that guarantees runaway education costs.

          The universities provide a service. It’s really hard to determine the value of that service since there isn’t a liquid market for “an education” or “a Harvard degree” that you can easily look up.

          The government then says they’ll cover a percentage of that cost. This is a bit tricky. A normal subsidy is effectively a paying a fraction of the cost. Once you introduce loan forgiveness, either as a frequent or guaranteed event, that fraction effectively goes to 100%.

          The student is getting a degree of unknown value but since they don’t have to pay (at least not the whole thing) they’ll just agree to the purchase, even if they don’t personally think the good is worth as much as the provider is charging. There’s no reason to if someone is picking up the bill.

          The universities see that their price elasticity of demand (how much their sales suffer when they overcharge) is essentially 0. That means they can raise them with impunity. The end result is that Universities can essentially help themselves to large government grants without any requirement to show the public how we benefit from those grants.

          If we consider education to be a public good then we should treat it as such. That would mean that we cancel the student loan program, get rid of tax subsidies for educational institutions and just have the federal government create a competing educational system. Take the money we’re spending on outsourcing education to the private sector and add to it. For the system to work it would need to attract top tier professors and that means good research facilities and salaries. It’s not a complicated idea but it would be a massive undertaking.

          As a bonus we’d get some great initialisms. The federal universities would obviously be the FU system. State campuses might have names like FUNY and FUCA.

          And yes, the point of such a system is that it would be paid entirely by taxes and would be free to students.

  • @Sterile_Technique
    link
    411 year ago

    Wouldn’t our wages just get garnished or shit repo’d or something? I’m 100% for forgiveness cuz fuck that predatory shit, but this route seems like a guarantee to just exacerbate harm to the borrowers.

    • Neuromancer
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      Nothing will be repoed. They may garnish your wages but at the end of the day, there is no collateral.

      • @cbarrick
        link
        51 year ago

        Garnished wages is still a huge problem.

        Student loans are not forgiven in bankruptcy.

        The federal government will garnish borrowers wages until they are paid, even if the borrower is bankrupt.

        • Neuromancer
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          They look at your wages and expenses. I knew a dentist who got garnished 10 dollars a month. That’s all he could afford.

          You can’t take blood from a turnip

          • @jpreston2005
            link
            21 year ago

            i applied for income based repayment program 3-4 different times, always denied. I was making around 2k/month, and they wanted me to pay $1000/month. after getting rejected the third or fourth time, I just stopped even attempting to handle the debt in good faith.

            • Neuromancer
              link
              fedilink
              -11 year ago

              That is insane. I don’t think college should be free but it needs to be less expensive. It shouldn’t cost an arm and leg to go to college and cost more than a car. I strongly support a subsidized school system that is reasonably priced. Free just means fewer people would be able to go. That is how most other countries handle the situation. I want everyone to have access to a low cost education to better themselves either for a job or just for personal enjoyment. I am always taking college classes but it has become a strain on my budget.

              • girlfreddy
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                @wintermute_oregon @jpreston2005

                Why shouldn’t it be free? I mean if businesses are making A LOT of money from the labour of those who’ve paid extraordinary amounts for their education - and are no where near providing equal compensation for that labour - then businesses should be paying for ALL education.

                • Neuromancer
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  I explained why it shouldn’t be free. We would have to limit the number of students like the rest of the world does to control the cost. We would close it off to only the brightest and most people would be excluded from a college education. That is how most countries handle college. Only the best get to go and the rest go to trade school or just work other jobs. I want people here to have the chance to better themselves. That is the American dream.

    • @CADmonkey
      link
      31 year ago

      If enough people refuse to pay, the courts can’t keep up.

    • Zuberi 👀
      link
      fedilink
      -21 year ago

      They can’t force you to give them money you don’t have. Just leave the country.

      • @thenerdjournals
        link
        11 year ago

        yes, I will use the money I don’t have to leave the country. 🧠

        • Zuberi 👀
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Read my other comments on it. You can get money from the gov (well more than enough to leave)

          • @grue
            link
            01 year ago

            Where are you going to get the money or skills to get some other country to accept you, though? If you had those, you wouldn’t be trying to leave (at least for this reason) in the first place!

            • Zuberi 👀
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              This is a fictional situation where a person loaned money to go/finish school. If you went to school, have a shit ton of debt, AND don’t want to do anything to improve, sure.

              Plenty (PLENTY) of countries take Americans no questions asked. The tough ones to get into are the ones that check your skin color before entry. But for those in particular, just be white and you’ll likely get in anyway. Such is life :/

              • @grue
                link
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s not a question of getting in; it’s a question of getting in with the kind of visa that allows you to work and being allowed to stay long-term.

                For example, even a white engineer like me would have trouble immigrating to somewhere like New Zealand without already having an employer lined up beforehand. The relevant type of visa isn’t even accepting new “expressions of interest” right now, LOL.

                • Zuberi 👀
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Using a tiny-ass country as an example of tough immigration is disingenuous. Plenty of places will take you. Open your mind.

  • @Confused_Emus
    link
    14
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m considering not paying as long as they’re doing the “ease you back into it” stuff like not reporting to credit agencies or garnishing wages. Seems essentially like a forbearance without the interest freeze. It really just depends on what my new payments end up being. But until that dog gets its teeth back, Nelnet can have what’s left after I pay my actual bills and buy my weed.

    • TheWoozy
      link
      -51 year ago

      Drugs before keeping promises is my motto too!!

      • @Confused_Emus
        link
        31 year ago

        Definitely not a “too” in this situation. I still handle my responsibilities.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        51 year ago

        Some of us need it for medical reasons. Like severe pain.

      • @Confused_Emus
        link
        -31 year ago

        No, I said paying my actual bills first. AND buying weed. Now go lick on nelnet’s tasty boot “r-tard”.

        • @MajorJimmy
          link
          21 year ago

          Don’t worry, they just can’t read.

  • @Worstdriver
    link
    14
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    "And with enough evaders,

    Escaping from the game,

    The rule becomes an empty shell

    That rules in only name…"

    • Leslie Fish, “Zero Game”
  • SeaJ
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    Boycotting only works when there is a noticeable financial hit to the producer. The federal government is not going to notice this. This can be good for campaigning though. Tell people that the reason they are not getting some forgiveness is because Republicans are doing everything they can to block it. Send out some flyers to everyone who has a federal student loan with a list of every Republican official who has had a PPP loan forgiven.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    I’m really glad I’m not going through this now, but I would boycott if I were. I fully support these people and hope to goodness they get the relief they need!

  • @unaredon
    link
    51 year ago

    Not from America so please someone explain to me, I read Biden wanted to forgive student loans but somehow it didn’t get through. Sure it would be much better if the loan is forgiven, but now it is not, shouldn’t you still pay back what is owned? They really think they can just not pay and expect no consequences?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      These loans are out right predatory. I was offered a 12% interest rate 7 years ago and have friends who’ve been offered 16%!!!

      Yes you can say just don’t sign it, but we’re 17 years old we can’t comprehend how much affect a 16% interest rate will have on you in 8 years and you’ve been told all your life college is the goto life path and you have to do this to get a “good job” and live a good life.

      I agree we should payback the money we loaned, but taking advantage of genz via predatory loans for wanting a higher education is downright criminal in itself.

      Adding onto this a lot of us will struggle to make these payments. I have 20k in loans and I haven’t paid a dime on EVER. Now I suddenly have a second car payment out of nowhere!

    • @doggle
      link
      201 year ago

      Of course everyone involved knows they will face consequences, but they may feel those consequences are better than the payments. Courts can’t garnish paychecks that don’t exist and a ruined credit rating only matters if you were ever going to be able to afford to buy a house or car in the first place. Afaik actual jail time isn’t really a thing for defaulting on a loan. If the only leverage the government has to get people to pay the loan is to threaten their future financial security, then anyone who thinks the initial promises of security is bogus has nothing to lose.

      There’s also some people who are willing to take the hit just to send a political message.

      That said, I suspect nowhere near 62% of borrowers will actually meaningfully boycott in any way.

    • @afraid_of_zombies
      link
      31 year ago

      He didn’t want to. He wanted to go thru the motions. If this mattered he would have executive ordered it and forced Congress to override. Even the Supreme Court can’t force the federal government to collect a debt/tax. And given the state of Congress there was no way Congress would override it.

      • mommykink
        link
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This. For all the shit he did, Trump expanded the executive powers through EO more than any modern president ever has. Biden could have 100% EO’d student loan forgiveness, damned the consequences but chose not to.

        • @afraid_of_zombies
          link
          51 year ago

          As I said, he could have instructed them to just not act on or pursue any payments. Let Congress vote to force the executive to do something deeply unpopular.

          • @singron
            link
            21 year ago

            If the next president reverses the order, then all these people are in the same position and might owe additional interest. Banks know this, so they will hold it against anyone seeking credit. Congress doesn’t even have to vote.

            With the income based repayment, they aren’t considered delinquent on their loans, interest doesn’t build, and there is a path towards having the debt forgiven eventually.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          The Democrats controlled both the house and the Senate for a time and didn’t get it done, or am I misremembering the Democrats controlling both?

          • TheWoozy
            link
            21 year ago

            When you take Sens Manchin & Sinema into concideration, their control was very weak. It’s a miracle the got the IRA done. It was a big F*ing deal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      They will take your house. As someone else said, with student loans there is no collateral. With a mortgage, your home is collateral, so you will forfeit it.

      • TheWoozy
        link
        -11 year ago

        Your income is the collateral. The banks will take it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          No, your income isn’t collateral. Garnishment is sought because there is no collateral to claim. Collateral is explicitly put up to guarantee a loan.

    • @doggle
      link
      141 year ago

      Bad move; the house is collateral. The bank can’t foreclose on an education, they definitely can take the house.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Nope, but they sure can garnish wages, claiming they’re entitled to it since they paid for the education that lead to the job

          • @CADmonkey
            link
            21 year ago

            And it starts to be a strain when enough people refuse to pay. If it takes multiple court cases, amd there are a few thousand in a court’s district, it’s going to get where you can’t do anything else because of all the student loan repayment cases.

            • @afraid_of_zombies
              link
              21 year ago

              Plus the possibility of it going to heck. They screw up somewhere, lose, and it multiples. Everyone who took out a loan in PA in 2006 is now eligible to get it discharged for example.

              What debt collectors and traffic court people don’t want you to know is that as long as you are willing to fight them chances are you will eventually win. And once someone wins a single time it gets established. There was a reason for a while Uber settled everything out of court.

              We are going to see an army of lawyers over the next few years suing the government over this while the US government has to spend more and more to get less and less.

    • @RagingRobot
      link
      121 year ago

      They can take my diploma but I do t want them to take my house