Tankies really ruined the word communism because communism doesn’t mean authoritarian or no individuality but tankies made it that
It just happens to mean that everywhere it got adopted larger than a medium-sized city or longer than a couple of years.
What no theory does to a mfer
What authoritarian boot licking does to a mf
I genuinely thought it was going to end with something silly like a “your mom” joke
hmm, I imagine the then 2 prevalent systems of neoliberal capitalism and soviet-style “communism” to be a pretty terrible combination actually. Although I believe I get what he was trying to say about individual rights within an economy of the commons(or at least thats how I interpret it).
I can’t follow, would you elaborate? Sounds like an interesting debate :)
Smaller groups of humans (villages, households, …?) could decide among themselves whether they prefer to live together by capitalist or communist principles. These smaller groups could function within a larger federation - a bit like the fediverse with its smaller instances where each can decide their own internal rules.
yeah, thats probably a really unstable combination, as the internal logic of capitalism requires infinite growth, so the capitalist parts will be strongly incentivised to expand into and consume the communist parts.
But maybe different kinds of socialist communities could federate like this?
That’s roughly the idea of Anarchism, Democratic Confederalism, and how the Zapatistas govern themselves. But they’re all anti-capitalist.
![Common MLK W [Rule]](https://files.catbox.moe/hmj37f.jpg){kind=link}