-edited for results- NSFW Content is now fully permitted BUT it must be tagged. Any NSFW content that has not been tagged and blurred will be removed. Content warnings should also be added to the title in brackets. Example: [penis] or: [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged. Yes, even female breasts. IRL GORE IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER ANY CONDITION.

  • @[email protected]
    69•2 years ago

    As long as something that might get me in trouble if my boss saw it is marked as nsfw (and so blurred by default) i don’t care. So i think any level is fine so long as it’s tagged appropriately

    Edit: I wasn’t thinking about gore. Personally i’d prefer that not be allowed but if it is and blurred i can accept that

    • pezmaker
      31•2 years ago

      Seconded. If it’s marked nsfw and blurred, it’s my choice to view at that point and I don’t give a shit. My bad for playing roulette and losing if I clicked it and regret it.

    • @hemko
      1•2 years ago

      I’ve never seen terrible enough content that would get me in trouble with my current boss… Sorry I can’t use this measurement haha

  • @[email protected]
    52•2 years ago

    Personally, I’m fine with sexual content as long as it’s marked properly. But gore (aka NSFL content) should not be allowed here

  • CreamyWeenie
    18•2 years ago

    I’m cool with it as long as it’s marked, I just think we need to establish a line on what counts as NSFW or not since some things toe the line. Like are we hardline marking anything even remotely sexual, or just things that are clearly NSFW. Obviously the former would be easier to moderate because of the subjective nature of things, so I wouldn’t be opposed to that.

    Also do mods not have the ability to edit a post so they are marked as NSFW if it’s not already marked?

      • CreamyWeenie
        12•2 years ago

        For the sake of putting in my opinion I agree gore shouldn’t be allowed here. Although I’m pretty sure that’s already the case considering the instance we’re in and also this community’s origin.

  • TaviEnglish
    16•2 years ago

    Pretty sure tagging nsfw imagery is standard. Stuff like cropped porn, horny art and the like. Horny text gets a pass I think. Not sure about NSFL

      • MossOPM
        13•2 years ago

        Check my post history. We genuinely had to have a vote on wether to allow “cannibalposting”

          • MossOPM
            11•2 years ago

            I am merely following the will of the people. It was pretty unanimous that ppl liked ironic cannibalposting so now it’s allowed!

              • MossOPM
                13•2 years ago

                Ok dude chill it’s literally just memes where it’s like an anime girl and the caption is like “sorry I hope you don’t mind but I drugged you and am going to take your kidneys now.” No one is actually condoning cannibalism, and no one is posting anything NSFL.

                • ch1cken
                  1•2 years ago

                  next thing you know theres gonna be a goddamn vote set for terrorism and he’s going to allow that because the majority agreed to it. I find it mad how cannibalism is allowed here out of all things, some of the admins have their face as their pfp as well, really weird how they’re openly pushing cannibalism like that

    • MossOPM
      1•2 years ago

      Well what’s important to note there is the clause that it can’t be in a sexual circumstance. Porn is still not allowed without a tag.

  • Phuntis
    1•2 years ago

    as close to the line as you can get please cropped gay porn is an essential part of 196 culture