Lemmy appears to strip off gift tokens from the URL.

Use this link to access the full article

  • SaneMartigan@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m generally in the fuck China camp, but their embracing of green energy solutions is the best thing I’ve seen come out of that country in my lifetime. They’re not beholden to resource lobbyists who want to keep gas/coal/oil in as much use as possible.

  • ceenote
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    How does anyone replace anyone else when it comes to climate change? Sure, you can develop technology, but the countries who choose not to use it are still spewing their shit into our shared climate.

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      The US is dependent on international trade. If they’re the only ones emitting too much, the rest of the world could sanction them, reducing their emissions by collapsing their economy.

      With the US making moves on Greenland with no sign of being satisfied after, the EU would probably be up for those sanctions at some point.

    • GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think it’s referring to a perceived position as global leader in positive climate action. That with the US losing any hope of effective climate regulation, China could choose a more climate-friendly direction. They can develop technology, and can implement it. China’s CO2 emissions are very significant (this BBC article claims 30% of global emissions), so if it takes aggressive action it could make a serious impact on global emissions.

      Due to its global position, it could likely pressure allies or promote the adoption of Chinese green technologies.

      I am not saying any of this will happen, but China is certainly not powerless. I do agree that other countries would still be an issue - countries with lax environmental regulations could be cheaper manufactures and divert global manufacturing, lessening the impact of any Chinese action.

  • TrackinDaKraken
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    See, China is run by a dictator, and they’re doing good things. Doesn’t America want a dictator, too? Hmmm?

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      One of the issues with dictators is that they reflect the people that put them in power. Every dictator Americans have put in power so far has been a fascist who was bad for the local economy.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t think I particularly got that from this article. China isn’t stepping up in the way it needs to, but most countries aren’t, and the US is actively backsliding.

      • FunkyCheese@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        They are doing what they said they would do

        And they said they would reduce emissions

        Their plan is just later but more rapid switch