• @De_Narm
    link
    2371 year ago

    It’s funny how ‘getting an abortion’ is the most atheist thing the artist could think of - I believe that’s not even forbidden in the Bible?

    • @Zombiepirate
      link
      English
      2171 year ago

      There’s a recipe to induce abortion in the Bible.

      Not reading it is part of the book club.

      • @Lauchs
        link
        301 year ago

        I’ve been trying to find that bit and my apparently poor googling techniques are finding nothing. Do you mind sharing an article or passage? (Just got back from a vacation with some fairly religious family members who were goddamn tiring, would be nice to be able to cite this next time.)

          • @Lauchs
            link
            201 year ago

            Wild, thanks! And I appreciate the reference!

        • Billiam
          link
          641 year ago

          Oh, if you want more fun, read them these two verses:

          Exodus 21:12:

          Anyone who assaults and kills another person must be put to death.

          And Exodus 21:22:

          When people who are fighting injure a pregnant woman so that she has a miscarriage but no other injury occurs, then the guilty party will be fined what the woman’s husband demands, as negotiated with the judges.

          Then ask them why the punishment for killing a person is not the same as the punishment for causing a miscarriage.

          After that, ask them why, if the Bible is the “inerrant” word of God, do some translations of that second verse use “miscarriage” while others say something more general like “caused a premature birth” instead? Because the meaning of that verse changes drastically depending on which way it’s translated.

          At this point, you’ll probably be called a godless baby killer and uninvited from Thanksgiving dinner.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            After that, ask them why, if the Bible is the “inerrant” word of God, do some translations of that second verse use “miscarriage” while others say something more general like “caused a premature birth” instead? Because the meaning of that verse changes drastically depending on which way it’s translated.

            According to Google Translate, the original Hebrew for just that phrase directly translates to “and her children went out,” but with the full context of the verse it becomes “and her children are born.” Make of that what you will.

            I could translate it to “and she gets a black eye,” but that doesn’t make the word itself any less reliable, only my wrong translation. I don’t know about the people you hang out with, but I’m pretty sure it’s important for Christians to understand that human translations are prone to error.

            • Billiam
              link
              131 year ago

              It’s problematic to try to read that verse as just meaning “born” exactly because of the context. The whole passage is about restitution in two scenarios: a pregnant woman who is injured as a bystander from two men fighting and

              1. suffers an unclear birth event with no additional damage

              2. suffers an unclear birth event with additional damage.

              Breaking it down that way, it seems apparent to me that the birth event must mean a miscarriage. If two men fight and that causes a woman to go into labor, but her child is safely delivered, what restitution would be owed? What harm has actually been caused? That actually eliminates scenario 1. The only way the whole passage makes any sense for the father to be owed payment is to see what property he has been deprived of- a potential child, or a potential child and his wife. And this just helps to reinforce the point: the punishment for causing the death of a person is not the same as for causing a miscarriage, which means that in the Old Testament unborn fetuses we’re not equal to people

              And no, American Evangelicals do not allow any room for error in translation of the Bible, because they see it as God’s direct word to man and therefore it can’t be wrong.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                Guess I must be something other than an American Evangelical then. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

                It sounds like you found a sensible way to translate it.

            • @Cabrio
              link
              111 year ago

              Born, or birthed? A stillborn is still birthed. See, we can play this game for millenia, others already have.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                51 year ago

                I copied what Google Translate told me. I’m no expert on matters relating to birth. That’s why I said “make of that what you will.”

                However, I do know that we have a lot more technical language than they did back then, so that’s something to keep in mind.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  The people who downvoted this have no sense of humor. C’mon, “borth?”… objectively hilarious.

          • @Lauchs
            link
            51 year ago

            Much appreciated!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            Pro-abortion in the case of adultery or rape. Plus it is from the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament so it’s a Christian thing by inheritance from Judaism.

        • @Neko
          link
          English
          241 year ago

          There is a kind of “recipe” in Numbers 5:11-31

          It’s a “test for an unfaithful wife” but it’s a curse which would make a woman miscarry a child if it belonged to someone other than her husband.

          • @Lauchs
            link
            71 year ago

            Much appreciated, that’s craziness!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          It really doesn’t mention abortions far as I can tell, and the people who say the Abrahamic tradition is anti-abortion is a bunch of shit as well.

          My Source

        • @toasteecup
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Just ask them how god defines weddings in Christianity then point out Jews had weddings first.

          • @Lauchs
            link
            161 year ago

            ? Sorry, what does that have to do with a recipe for abortion?

            • @toasteecup
              link
              English
              31 year ago

              Nada, but if your goal was to piss then off…

          • Saik0
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            They’re both abrahamic religions… It would make sense that God (being the same supernatural being in both religions) would have the same definition under both religions…

            • @toasteecup
              link
              English
              41 year ago

              It would but it doesn’t. Jews by and large don’t care about homosexual marriage and even find it acceptable per God’s teachings. The only ones who don’t are the conservative Jews.

              Christians on the other hand by and large care about homosexuality alot. Add to it Christians (in the states at least) like to say that they defined marriage, there’s proof that isn’t true. So if Christians didn’t invent it and were born of Judaism that would say to be that Christian belief regarding marriage is irrelevant from a “we created it” standpoint.

              Tying it back to my original thought, pointing that out to Christians pisses them off.

              This also works with abortion. Most Jews don’t care about it, some even go so far as to say this “a baby before birth is merely a part of the mother’s body.” Meaning it’s up to the mother what to do about her body. Up to and including termination.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        Everything’s a joke, but nothing is. Everything’s ironic, but also everything’s serious. Jokes are meant to make light of situations, but you can’t make them about serious stuff. It’s Schrödinger’s comedy, a true definition of Metarcasm: Everything real is satire and every satire is genuine.

      • HotsauceHurricane
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        My4 Yo found one of those in a bathroom and i was so pissed. And i couldnt really explain to her why she “couldn’t have the comic.” I told her it wasn’t a nice thing and NOBODY shpuld be reading it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            I’ve known a few people who have been servers, who had the tip line scratched out and one of those fake $100 Bible tracts left for them.

            Sometimes I really believe they litter that shit as a power play and not as a missionary thing.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                If I owned a restaurant that would be a fucking bar 100%. Even if you left a real tip, fuck you.

                Regular Bible litter, whatevs. Bad form. That fake hunski though? GTFO my restaurant and stay out.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1391 year ago

    Finally a relatable comic that offers a true look into the home of your standard antifa, or uppity lib.

    Why just the other day I found a baptism certificate in my daughters backpack.

    Well that was three abortions and the gender reassignment is booked for next year.

    Seriously though, holy fuck. How does someone come up with that nonsense and actually believe that?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      261 year ago

      There’s two types. One that is really that stupid and one that just wants to create chaos. There has been scientific research about this.

  • ryan213
    link
    1081 year ago

    She’s probably already pregnant from her youth pastor.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      THE YOUTH PASTOR PREGNANCY ABORTIONS FOR MY LITTLE SUSIE ARE JUST FINE.

      It’s all the other little whores who are enjoying sex or may die from their pregnancies that we really worry about. Those babies need to be saved for Jesus.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        We’re talking about a religion based on the fact that a god made a girl pregnant without her consent. So I guess it’s part of their beliefs ?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    991 year ago

    The fact that this is not satire about conservatives ridiculous fever dreams, but a serious depiction of one, makes it really damn funny :'D

    • @rockSlayer
      link
      301 year ago

      It made the comic even funnier when I saw that it was unironic

  • @who8mydamnoreos
    link
    English
    84
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Too bad such talented hands are attached to such a stunted mind.

  • iByteABit [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    821 year ago

    Wow, I don’t even know how to process this. The dumbass conservatives are getting so confused about life they’re actually creating sarcastic comics about their way of thinking unintentionally.

    This is peak irony

    • the post of tom joad
      link
      fedilink
      24
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In case you haven’t heard of them, chick tracts have been hilariously bad since before the Internet. They are plentiful, and at least as insane as this comic here. You could dedicate a sub to them. One of my favorites was one ‘in the near future’ where non-christian children were compared to Hitler youth.

  • TheBlue22
    link
    711 year ago

    Does he believe this? Does ANYONE belive this?

    To think people like these can vote

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      251 year ago

      They live in an echo chamber where everyone repeats the same nonsense, so yeah, I think loads of them believe it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        For educational purposes, go watch Fox News for an hour (WARNING: more than 90 minutes can cause brain damage). I absolutely guarantee you will hear the same phrase, with the same wording, 20-200 times (sometimes they are more emphatic depending on the subject) within that hour. If you repeat it enough times, some people will take it as hard fact.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      They not only can, but they will. Underlining the importance of anyone who sees this as obvious idiocy to vote as well.

    • BlinkerFluid
      link
      fedilink
      381 year ago

      The fun part is that it’s both!

      Why only have one fanbase when there’s two?

      • @ProfessorZhu
        link
        81 year ago

        Ah the Joe Rogan Avenue, that never goes wrong

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    471 year ago

    I know that this is serious, but it’s so bad is good.
    It has become the parody of a parody, this comic has so many layers of irony that transcends politics

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    411 year ago

    I feel like this should go in c/therightcantmeme, or c/conservativescantmeme. I don’t remember the exact name

  • Cows Look Like Maps
    link
    fedilink
    391 year ago

    Imagine if we just leaned into their wacky right-wing conception of pro-choice and were like “yeah, our endgame is to have as many abortions as possible per capita.” Their heads would explode lol

    • @droans
      link
      91 year ago

      Well 75% of his cartoons feature blatant racism, so I’m gonna go with no.

      And I don’t mean like dog whistle racism or microaggression, I mean like you’d expect to find these comics in the KKK magazine level.