• BlackLaZoR
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 minutes ago

    $54 a month isn’t exactly a lot. I’d question the sense of that tax altogether, because it induces processing and collection costs

  • chonglibloodsport
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Really surprised to hear they have sales tax on ALL food, not just packaged stuff or restaurant food! Not sure what the rationale is for that.

    • BlackLaZoR
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      In EU you have VAT on everything, so it’s not that different. Usually food products gave reduced rate tho

    • PalmTreeIsBestTree
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      The only good thing about living here is our rent and gas prices are still relatively lower than average. If they start passing shit like this, might as well go move over to Illinois or do my shopping there.

    • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Its a republican majority in Missouri.

      That’s why.

      And yes I know a republican suggested this bill. It’s all theater. Get one of them to introduce something like this so the rest can strike it down but then you feel some slight glimmer of hope because, “well_ they are trying to help us!!”

      But they aren’t. They never are.

      • chonglibloodsport
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Didn’t you know? Billionaires eat hundreds of millions of steaks a year!

    • starlinguk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      In the EU and the UK all food has sales tax. It’s around 20 percent for “luxury” food and around 5 percent for necessary food like bread and milk (some countries have more levels, like France, which has 20, 10, 5 and 2.5).

        • GreenKnight23
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          oh, yeah. most US states still require sales tax on all food, regardless of if it’s raw or not.

          it’s yet another one of those things Americans don’t realize how fucked up it is until someone points out why it’s fucked up.

            • GreenKnight23
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              keep in mind the definition of what foods are and are not taxed vary from state to state.

              some state may not tax you for a box of cereal, while another will because it’s been prepared and is “ready to eat”.

              that would mean that the only time tax benefit would help consumers is when they are buying raw foods such as fruits and vegetables. something that most Americans can’t afford and usually purchase canned (processed).

              just because a state has a law that forbids them from “taxing groceries” doesn’t mean there’s a direct benefit to consumers.

  • RoidingOldMan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I didn’t realize there were states where groceries were taxed.

  • Ryoae@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    State Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman, an Arnold Republican, said the bill is an attempt to increase affordability for Missourians as prices rise.

    Read that over and over again, Missourians.

    • flandish
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      21 hours ago

      poor and hungry people will work for much less wage than people with proper nutrition and savings accounts.

    • thesmokingman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah fuck the bill’s sponsor and her desire to reduce costs for a family of four by $50 every month

      State Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman, an Arnold Republican, said the bill is an attempt to increase affordability for Missourians as prices rise.

      “Missourians are paying more and more for necessities,” Coleman said. “Most of us agree fundamentally that essential services should not be funded on the backs of the poor.”

      Coleman said a family of four would save $54 per month with the removal of grocery sales tax.

      • Kjell
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It’s nice to try to reduce the cost for the citizens but with less tax money some other tax needs to be increased or some service will have to save money.

        Dimmitt also said that because the bulk of property taxes go to schools and other jurisdictions, local governments rely on sales taxes to fund police and fire departments, road repairs, trash and recycling, among many other services.

        • Arcadeep
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Easy, take some of the taxes that’s going to the police and do something useful with them

  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Tax cuts only benefit corporations. They already price their goods at the maximum that consumers will (read: are able to) pay. Guess what happens if consumers can suddenly pay 10% more because they don’t have to pay 10% tax?

    • Paranoidfactoid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      No. There is nuance to the tax cut and tax levy argument. Circumstances matter. Cutting taxes on groceries would immediately lower food prices for everyone, the poor included.

    • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      So the opposite must be true too right? When taxes go way up companies drop their prices to compensate because, according to you they only charge what consumers can pay. Except that doesn’t happen at all. Instead tariffs just caused prices to go way up without any intervention by corporations.

      What complete nonsense.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        one of the things i love about australian taxes: by law the displayed price must include all taxes… the price on the label/menu/sign/website/whatever is the price you pay… by law

        always catches me out in the US adding tax and tip 😓 i end up spending way more than i’d intended and having a far worse experience because of it

        • iegod@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s usually even more sinister for tips when using machines as the % is calculated on the total (including tax). Duplicitous bullshit.

  • Doomsider
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    60 seconds ago

    Regressive taxes are the name of the game. Tax the poors and get them pay for the government.

    That is all tariffs are as well. A regressive tax that the poor pay. They had been trying to ram through a flat tax which would do the same thing for years and now they are doing it underhandedly with tariffs.

    That is why the Republicans aren’t throwing a fit, because it is secretly exactly what they have always wanted.