“Based on your consent, we may collect and use your biometric information for safety, security, and identification purposes,” The revised policy of X(Twitter) is expected to go into effect on September 29, 2023.

The thing is, biometric data is permanent and can’t be changed. If we share that with X, it could mean lifelong privacy risks. And seriously, I can’t think of a single reason why Elon needs to know where I went to high school for data security purposes.

People keep talking about leaving Twitter, but when will they actually do that? I guess they’ll just keep putting up with it, and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.

  • Wothe
    link
    English
    1541 year ago

    Just for you guys to know, a Saudi teacher got death sentence over tweets, cuz it is linked to his identity, and now Elon even wants more specific data from users? People need to give up on Twitter!

    • @dilan
      link
      English
      20
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Apparently, Elon did not get any lesson from the Saudi man’s death at all. Its so important for people to remain anonymous in the digital world.

      Try this, I found people talking about this on Lemmy: https://www.alchemy.com/dapps/wiremin

      So I downloaded, and from my experience so far on this decentralized social network, it has the ability to replace Twitter for those who care about privacy and are concerned with data breaches.

      • Using an Anonymous ID, it does not require either an email or a phone number when creating accounts.
      • It is decentralized, with no central cloud server to store our data.
      • There is no censorship; no one can ban your account or remove your content.
      • It connects the world widely, so no single country, government, or person can manipulate the content we see.
      • The feed/chat space, DMs, voice calls, and fast file/pic transfers are all end-to-end encrypted.
    • @MaxPow3r11
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Part of the problem is…people were suspended FOR NO REASON & now their data is not recoverable + they can’t delete their accounts.

      They (I) are basically trapped.

      (unless you live in a country that offers “user protections”…what a concept.)

    • Wothe
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      deleted by creator

  • Wothe
    link
    English
    521 year ago

    For safety, security purpose??? Bullshit

    • @Mrduckrocks
      link
      English
      271 year ago

      For safety and security of dictators around the the world, so its easier for them to identify critiques.

    • r00ty
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Security is what pretty much all companies use when collecting data. It’s designed to stop you dead. Many people have been conditioned to see “security” as necessary.

      Calls may be recorded for security and training purposes.

  • Chariotwheel
    link
    fedilink
    471 year ago

    That’s not all. The company has further outlined in its upcoming privacy policy it “may use the information we collect and publicly available information to help train our machine learning or artificial intelligence models.”

    All artists better get the fuck off that plattform. I doubt he will stop at text.

    • @thehatfox
      link
      English
      161 year ago

      I imagine that’s going to be policy of most commercial online platforms going forward if the AI boom continues.

      User pressure might keep it away from dedicated art sharing platforms, but general purpose social media will end up open season as a source of training data.

      • @zeppo
        link
        English
        111 year ago

        It already has. That’s why Twitter and reddit have tightened their API policies and locked down websites for non-signed in users. Not to prevent AI training… just so they can charge for it.

  • @tabular
    link
    English
    401 year ago

    “Safety, security”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      This is a great new idiot test. Anyone who buys Musk’s reasoning is so stupid or dishonest that they can’t be trusted with anything.

      • @RagingRobot
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        It’s gotten to the point that I question anyone who links to Twitter now or has an account. Like why? Why not leave already?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I have an account dedicated to flaming Elon or Elon d-suckers. Whenever I get angry or pissy, I go there

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    351 year ago

    This increasing interest in biometric data, not just from “X”, is concerning to say the least

  • Gazumi
    link
    English
    291 year ago

    Bless, they’re always thinking about our safety.

  • @paddirn
    link
    English
    251 year ago

    Ahh yes, the company owned by Elon Musk, who famously called a diver a “pedophile” for criticizing his coffin submarine idea to rescue some kids. He’s also slashed budgets and cut manpower in all the important departments at twitter. That’s the person I’m most likely to trust with my personal information.

  • @thehatfox
    link
    English
    251 year ago

    How exactly do they plan to collect biometric data? In most platforms biometric data remains on device.

    Perhaps Elmo will try spinning some sort of WorldCoin style biometric crypto scheme next.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      They’ll simply ask for it and people will give it in order to keep using the platform.

      Google Ads asked me (a private individual) to provide my drivers license or passport in order to verify an organization’s Google Ads account, or else the account will be suspended. I understand verifying the organization via governed registration records, that makes sense. But requiring an emoloyee or volunteer’s passport?

      The account is just going to get suspended.

    • @mind
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • resketreke
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Besides the IRS who could give them that info?

        The users themselves, in their stupidity, like every single time in the past.

        • @mind
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          deleted by creator

      • Dept
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        he already tested out a job listings tab so he’ll just collect it from users that way.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        How exactly would a phone camera get a clear image of your retina? I very much doubt anything like this is possible but maybe I’m missing something

        • @mind
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I mean how would this work though, even assuming that technology hurdle is cleared (definitely doubting it, a slightly dark room can totally hose a cell phone photo)?

            The Twitter app has to request camera use and then ask the user to do that. What possible benefit would there be for the user?

            • @mind
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              deleted by creator

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Yeah, maybe. Doesn’t sound attractive to me though, there are already several ways to authenticate which work fine.

    • @CeeBee
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      If there’s a photo of you anywhere on The-Platform-Formerly-Known-As-Twitter, then that’s it. That’s biometric data.

      People have this weird idea that “biometric data” needs some special scanning process like in movies. As if some green laser needs to sweep across your body to “collect” biometric data.

      A photo is all that’s needed. That’s it.

      You read these articles that talk about “the dangers of biometrics” (in the context of facial recognition) and they often cite that the database can be hacked and people’s biometric data will get stolen.

      That’s not a concern. Every system that captures biometric data for later use is completely different than the next system. It would be like trying to run an Android app on an iPhone.

      Actually, it’s very much like the pre-IBM days. There were many different computer systems that weren’t compatible with each other. Biometrics is like that, but 100 times more incompatible. Each system needs a ground truth photo to generate the model/template/biometric data.

      So I’ll say it again, if there’s a photo of you on Former-Twitter, even a profile photo, they have your biometrics.

  • @Hazdaz
    link
    English
    21
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The issue here isn’t that Elon wants your biometric data.

    The issue is that there will be a bunch of absolute idiots who freely give him their data.

    • Pons_Aelius
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      The issue here isn’t that Elon wants your biometric data.

      No, that is the issue. Everyone can decide if they want to or not. I assume that most here are smart enough not to.

      The issue is that there will be a bunch of absolute idiots who freely give him their data.

      If people want to give that info away, then who am I to stop them?

      • pjhenry1216
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        I think it’s naive to frame it as “wanting to give data” but more that they’re allowing themselves to be exploited because many simply don’t even know what’s in the policy, there are many who concede that they can’t do without the platform, and then simply folks who don’t know better. I highly doubt there’s any significant number of people who understand the policy and happily consent even if they could easily give up the platform instead.

        So I think they’re both problems. A platform needing data beyond what’s necessary to provide the service AND that most people will either concede defeat or not know better.

    • @MaxPow3r11
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      & then “reality” will be shaped into an even more fucked up hell using that same data.

      Fuck this bullshit.

    • @s1vgmOP
      link
      English
      01 year ago

      As the news says, “Based on your consent”

      • Dalë
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        So long as you trust that no means no.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    Why would anybody do this? To access a service so bad it keeps falling?

    No thanks, dipshit

    • dinckel
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      A large amount of people I know said that, and actually did it. For the rest, the alternatives are not big enough to farm clicks off ragebait and AI “art”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    X is safe and effective?

    Since Elon has been very transparent about his goal of making X the everything app, by adding all this stuff and biometrics… For security?

    What could possibly go wrong?

    • @MaxPow3r11
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      He’s also friends with Putin & other autocrats.

      What could go wrong?

      Oh yeah…Elon has been known to ban every antifascist. & he wants access to all of their information.

  • @Dasnap
    link
    English
    131 year ago

    Next they’re gonna want blood and semen samples.

    • @Plopp
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      Ooh, are they gonna come fellate me?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Rub one out for Elon, and drink your verification can dear, or the smart home won’t let me have my coffee.

        • @Plopp
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          Phew that verification can saved that sentence from going places I would not have wanted it to.

    • @s1vgmOP
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Big no

  • @DirkMcCallahan
    link
    English
    131 year ago

    Sadly, plenty of idiots will gladly hand over whatever he wants. Even if you COULD trust that he wouldn’t use your data for nefarious purposes, why would you want yet ANOTHER company to have the complete story of your life in a hackable database? Remember the Equifax data breach? Guess most people don’t.

    • ZeroCool
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Remember the Equifax data breach?

      Remember how we sent every C-level to prison for twenty years and fined the company out of existence? lol jk corporations are infallible and it’s our fault our data was held by a private company without our consent.

  • Margot Robbie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Well, most celebs and e-celebs should get off X pretty much immediately, because at this rate this data will inevitably gets leaked somewhere for a Blue Checkmark.

    Also, impersonating celebrities? On the Internet? Who would do such a thing?

    (Crypto is so dumb by the way.)