- cross-posted to:
- news
- cross-posted to:
- news
You must log in or # to comment.
NATOs power comes from ALL of its “MEMBERS”!!
THE US “IS” ONE OF THOSE MEMBERS!
So if TRUMP is calling NATO a “paper” TIGER then that means he’s CALLING HIMSELF and the US a PAPER tiger.
That is UNPATRIOTIC!
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
You forgot the sign-off:
COLE S LAW
The irony of him misusing “paper tiger” and then demonstrating its correct usage is going to implode me.
“President of the USA threatens to destroy the USAs most powerful geopolitical tool”
Growing up I legitimately thought the US were the head of NATO. Gotta admit that I only recently, like a good few years ago, found out that’s not true.
The way they act is so bizarre, no matter from which angle you approach the topic.
It’s not bizarre if you look at from the angle that Trump is a Russian asset
That puppet is way too skinny.
Growing up I legitimately thought the US were the head of NATO.
Depending on what exactly you mean by “head of NATO”, they kind of are.
The Supreme Allied Commander Europe has always been an American General. So in case of an actual NATO war in Europe, the US would be in charge of coordinating joint military operations.
I meant sort of like the US government being able to more or less directly command NATO, calling all the shots atleast.
Right, the US couldn’t just take command of NATO and other member states’ militaries without those countries signing off on it. But they can basically use political pressure to make countries join their excursions, like what happened after 9/11 (the only time Article 5 was ever invoked). And well, the “defensive” aspect of that entire campaign is questionable …
So while they don’t have direct control, I’d still say the US is very much the “head of NATO”.
I mean the US’s most powerful geopolitical tool is a toss up between its weapons industry, its dominance in global finance and being the richest country in the world, but yeah NATO is a close third/fourth.
Well, it used to be its relationship with other powerful and wealthy countries, which combined with what you’ve said, made it a superpower.
Now, it can’t even corral a coalition of the unwilling. It looks like they are going to walk away from Iran having lost. They have achieved nothing but kill lots of people and damaged the global economy more than any damage to Iran. Iran is now in a stronger position as threats against them will be more empty going forward.
I welcome peace but my worry is that trunos narcissism will prevent them walking away with the loss and he’ll be goaded into continuing.
He’s been very active in it since the first term.
Saw this comment made elsewhere:
Why doesn’t Trump ask his ‘Board of Peace’ to come bail him out?
Or his buddy putain. He will always shit on allies before adversaries.
He’s too busy shrugging off Russian intelligence sharing with Iran to help Iran target and kill American soldiers. Not nearly as disrespectful to our troops as that time Obama saluted a Marine with a coffee cup in his hand.
Remember the Suez Crisis? Pepperidge Farm remembers…
NATO is not there just to bail you out when stupid wars you start go south.
PS:
Vice-President Richard Nixon (Europe) later explained: “We couldn’t on one hand, complain about the Soviets (russians) intervening in Hungary (Ukraine) and, on the other hand, approve of the British (muricans) and the French (israel?) picking that particular time to intervene against Nasser (Iran)”.
lol
Eisenhower was very strongly anti-imperialist and was pressuring Britain and France to relinquish their colonies, which they eventually did, though France tried hard to hang onto Algeria until they were driven out. And both Britain and France still hang onto places here and there (part of Polynesia, Martinique, Diego Garcia, Gibraltar, Northern Ireland,).
And of course, Eisenhower cared about not being a hypocrite. Trump will say or do anything, regardless of consistency, like postal voting while trying to ban postal voting. For him, it’s a flex.
Eisenhower was surplanting the French and British Empires with the American Empire. That’s why he had his brother organize the coup in Tehran and why he laid the groundwork for Vietnam.
All he knows is how to act like a mafioso. I think he fundamentally doesn’t understand what an alliance actually is.
He doesn’t understand what a mafioso does, either. He saw a couple gangster movies but didn’t understand the subtext.
He fundamentally doesn’t understand a lot of geopolitical and basic human norms unfortunately.
Except for “might makes right” apparently… 😑
And he doesn’t even know how to apply that properly. If you’re going to be a bully and use hard power, you have to exercise said hard power against anyone who argues.
Weak-mindedness and hard power don’t really work together.
He doesn’t have the heart to be a dictator. The guy likes the admiration too much and is scared of that going away, so he chickens out when a real dictator needs to get tough. By doing that he’s showing weakness to the real dictators, the equivalent of having a “kick me” sign stuck to his back.
“He” has a lot of people in the room making decisions.
Please proofread the PS part, is hard to understand
When you think the orange child rapist cannot display any less understanding of what is happening around him… he reconfirms ignorance knows no limits
His whole life others get him bailed out from tribute he created, but this time no one wants to get into this mess. I think he is panicking.
You’re fired! Oh, in US english: Your fired!
Trump fundamentally misunderstands
the idea of NATO and its position purely as a defensive alliance.Edit: ftfmyself
Everyone eventually turns away from a baby’s constant tantrum, except the poor mother, and she’s long gone.
“Paper tiger.”
What’s next? “Running dog curs”?
