• DoctorNope
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 day ago

    By the end of this thing I fully expect Trump to hand-deliver them the plans for the bomb and claim that it’s a win because he didn’t allow them to develop it themselves.

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      “But the only thing you redacted was the uran part in the word uranium. And then only the once!!”

    • zikzak025
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      “No no, you see, we gave them plans but with all of the critical pieces redacted. That means we ‘honored’ the agreement but didn’t actually have to give them anything important.”

      Meanwhile, Iran highlights the “redacted” text and just pastes it into a text file

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ah the classic “if I can’t have it nobody can”

    A favourite of the consentually challenged.

  • homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    well, Iran was letting a few ships through under strict circumstances, especially if they paid a huge toll. Trump is creating a total blockade.

    still stupid, but there is a difference.

    • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      It wasn’t really a huge toll. It was 1 dollar a barrel, a ship carrying a million barells worth 100 million dollars of oil would pay 1 million. That is a 1% tax which isn’t that big unless you are an oil company that is used to paying nothing or getting a subsidy.

      I’m waiting for Iran to let through European bound vessels for free to set Trump up to order strikes on Spanish or British ships.

      Start up a whole new front where NATO kicks the USA out and blockades the USA from international trade.

      • picnic
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Isnt the strait like open seas and not anyone’s territorial waters? If so, I dont see taxing vessels legal, no matter how small the fee is.

        I’ve worked for a publicly listed company, and we’ve been doing savings for mere $10k’s. I think while compared to the oil carried the fee would be small, you could employ 20 people for a year for that sum. And that’s a one way fee for one vessel

      • homes@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        well, you’re right that the oil companies shipping the oil can easily pay the price, but that doesn’t mean they won’t still pass the cost on, even if they are getting subsidies. and the average ship carries around 2 million barrels. sure, some carry less, and the big ones can carry up to ~ 4 million, but the point is that the costs will be passed on to the customer either way.

        not to mention the massive backlog which already exists. even if they opened up the strait right now, to full capacity, it could take months to clear the backlog. and with those waiting to go through in line running out of (or already completely out of) supplies, some starving, this gets even more desperate. and stupid.

        and don’t even get me started on NATO

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Would you rather by oil for $60 + $1 toll, or for $150? Either one gets passed on to customers.

          • homes@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’d rather have neither, and the strait controlled by the UN, like before Trump fucked everything up with this idiotic and unnecessary war

              • homes@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                23 hours ago

                tolls that get passed on to customers isn’t “good” for anyone but the toll-collector and, potentially, the embezzling oil company

    • jacksilver
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m confused by why everyone sees this as stupid. It seems like an obvious eventuality. Why would Trump allow Iran to use the strait? Leaving it open to Iranian interests only benefits Iran.

      • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Because if he blockades Chinese oil ships, as he would need to to actually blockade the Strait, he’s declaring war on China.

        • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Or china goes lol and doubles down heavier on green energy instead of spending on military. Which is the logical thing to do.

      • homes@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        because it only escalates the conflict further while possibly dragging in other major actors like china and India when what both sides need now (not to mention the global economy) is a negotiated peace.

        edit: the consequences so far have already been terrible, and the longer this conflict goes on, the worse it will get for literally everyone.

        • jacksilver
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I mean for however smart Iran had been playing things, their ceasefire conditions were not made to end the conflict. I mean there is global opposition to a toll on the strait.

          Not to mention that this blockade stance is at least not diplomacy through bombs.

            • jacksilver
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              I’m not saying it’s not an aggressive action, but saying I’ll bomb anything that crosses this line is vastly different to I’ll keep bombing your entire country.

              I mean, how do you think Iran would enforce a toll on the strait. A threat of violence is part of diplomacy, maybe not the best kind of diplomacy, but still.

          • homes@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Not to mention that this blockade stance is at least not diplomacy through bombs.

            it sure is when Trump threatens to blow up anyone who opposes his blockade. it’s just bombs through different means. and Iran is smart enough that they hold all the cards here-- Trump called the blockade illegal and the charging of tolls illegal (both true, technically), then proceeds to demand a share of the tolls and blockades the strait himself. Both of these are obviously non-starter positions which he has repeatedly, himself, very loudly called illegal, placing him in no position to use them as negotiating positions and making him look like both a hypocritical ass and an idiot. well, ya know, more.

            this puts Iran ahead, again whenever they start negotiations again, and, until then, now they have a bunch of US navy warships to shoot at in the strait, just sitting there, that weren’t there before, in range of their missiles and drones. boom.

            add this to a long list of Trump strategic missteps and losses so far, and this weakens Trump’s and the US’s position even further

  • BC_viper
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    I fucking laughed when I saw the news. Its the ultimate “no, you can’t quit, im firing you” sure dude whatever you say.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      No. All reports of US ships approaching were ships that Iran ordered to turn back, and they did. The US can blockade from Indian Ocean/Arabian sea.

    • marcos
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      A few already are in range of Iran drones. It will mean some more ship will.

      Iran seems not interested in attacking them right now. What makes sense, since they are in negotiations.

  • AccoSpoot1
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yknow, you say this, but honestly it worked for Caeser against Vercingetorix

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      While it is an interesting comparison, it is actually the reverse.

      The point of a siege is to starve out the defenders, while suppressing relief, so that the defenders will eventually submit. (See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investment_(military)) In this case, if we map “blockade” onto “besiege”, it was Iran that initiated the blockade of the Gulf States. So if Trump blockades the blockade, he’s not doing Caesar’s move, he’s doing Vercassivellaunos’s move. Trump is not the besieger, he’s the relief.

      That said, the blockade of Hormuz is strategically very different from besieging a fortified position. The strategic value of a siege is localized, it’s about defeating the enemy and neutralizing that position. The strategic value of the blockade of Hormuz is global. The Iranians are not trying to neutralize the Gulf States. They are trying to force a cost on the world economy, to get the rest of the world to restrain the powers attacking them. The strategic gamble I think is that they are hoping that the global effects of the blockade are non-linear, whereas the effects on them are linear.

    • marcos
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nah, all that Caesar got was getting blockaded himself. Blockading the blockade blockading the blockade was what actually worked.

  • MinnesotaGoddam
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    you know i was watching star trek the other night and you know the first thing picard did when he got command of the flagship?

    he surrendered.

    bad. fucking. ass.

    he surrendered. and won. bet krasnov doesn’t have enough balls to pull that off.

  • Inucune
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Not that this war and everything about it from our (US) side isn’t certifiably retarded… … couldn’t we have just done that in the first place?