I didn’t know that kingdoms had feet, let alone ones that contained women.
I almost didn’t share it because of that, but I would’ve felt weirder about editing someone’s tweet.
It’s awkwardly phrased, but not grammatically incorrect.
Why? Y?
The owner of the feet is “every woman in the kingdom,” ergo “every woman in the kingdom’s feet.”
No, it should be “the feet of every woman in the kingdom.”
Yes, that is a better way to phrase it for clarity, but the one shown is also grammatically correct.
Ambiguity is never correct unless used for humorous intent.
I am no English expert but it just sounds wrong
Nah, fix that shit
deleted by creator
The “feet” are the areas where the commoners live
deleted by creator
Hmm. So is quintin Tarantino interested in a remake?
Ah yes, it’d be super easy to find one white blonde woman via description. Not very many of those.
“Your Highness, you did get a look at her face, surely it would be easier to—“ “DID I STUTTER?”
Loved when stories can be stories and things didn’t have to make sense. Now we have stories where they have to spoon feed you all the details. I just want to see paw patrol god damnit
Guess he was to drunk to rember
I mean he did watch her ride off in a carriage made of pumpkins
Let’s just say… he was a little drunk that night so the only thing is her shoe to make sure it’s the right one.
Why not ask her? Idk…
Because people can lie
