I’ve been using gyroid infil almost exclusively since I first tried it.

I was using cubic before, which was fine, but gyroid seems much sturdier for the same % infil even if it does take a bit more print time.

Also it looks awesome.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    I can hear the noise my printer makes in my head just looking at this picture

    wooo wabble waddle waddle wooo

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    It’s Prusa’s favourite for a reason. I like the look a lot so that combined with it being strong and non-crossing is why I use it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I just wish it didn’t take so much longer to print than adaptive cubic at the same infill percent.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Yes, adaptive cubic varies the density of the cubic structure to decrease filament usage while supposedly maintaining the same strength as normal cubic. And, in my own experience, gyroid always takes longer to print than adaptive cubic – sometimes it only adds a few minutes, but I’ve seen it add nearly half of the print time again for infill-heavy prints.

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      True, although the idea is to print significantly less of it because of how sturdy it is.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Same. Sometimes you want something fast. For things that don’t need to be sturdy at all (little display figures and stuff like that) I’ll use cubic or even lightning infil

      • newIdentity
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        You could also just use a lower infill percentage since it’s stronger

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          There’s a type of cubic that starts out lower and increases in density as it reaches the top to support the top layers. That’s mainly the one I was thinking of. I can’t remember the name of it though. And lightning is suuuper fast but provides basically no strength

  • LazaroFilm
    link
    English
    61 year ago

    That’s all I use similar strength in every direction low material use and ease of print (it’s waves but no sharp corners so easy on the printer’s acceleration.

  • @4lan
    link
    English
    61 year ago

    same journey for me, cubic then gyroid.

    I love the way it looks so much I made some coasters using gyroid infill with no top layers, and filled it with resin. such a cool pattern

    I even made a vent cover with it since it lets air through still and looks cool

      • @4lan
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Thanks! It’s fun to mix both skills into one project.

        Here is how they turned out

          • @4lan
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            Lightning infill from Cura

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I thought so but I’ve only ever used it on taller TPU prints where I want them to basically be hollow so I’ve never seen it look quite like that!

              • @4lan
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                fairly high infil percentage if I remember correctly. I did 20% first and it was very sparse

  • @EvokerKing
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    I like it, but sometimes I have to use something like concentric for thinner pieces. But in general, it is pretty neat.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I haven’t had a use case where something is too thin for gyroid yet. I can definitely see that being useful though!

  • @Cobrachicken
    link
    English
    31 year ago

    Did you probably happen to compare it to 3d honeycomb? Quite pleased with that meself.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I haven’t tried that one yet. I don’t see that one in Cura - is that in prusa slicer?

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      The only advantage 3d honeycomb has is speed.

      3dh Is directional, has stress points, and has less fluid transitions between changing layers.

      Unless you’re absolutely in a hurry, it’s easily the best infill.

      • JustEnoughDucks
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That is literally its biggest disandadvantage lol.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upELI0HmzHc&t=417

        3D honeycomb is insanely slow. It takes like double or triple the time and is super stressful on the printer because of very high accelerations.

        Pretty much its only use of honeycomb seems to be making the absolute strongest prints in compression strength. 3D honeycomb is slightly better, but it is essentially the master of none. Line and rectilinear have the best surface, cubic and gyroid have the best transverse strength. Triangle has as good of compression strength and transverse strength as honeycomb and better than 3D honeycomb while taking a fraction of the time to print.

        Honeycomb is probably one of the worst “popular” infills.

  • Mom Nom Mom
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    I have to find something to print with that - I don’t usually do the slicing, but I’m totally going to use gyroid infill whenever I can. Probably as a feature - like someone else said, make coasters without the top or bottom layer, and use it decoratively. Awesome!

  • @CarlosCheddar
    link
    English
    31 year ago

    I switched my petg to gyroid after having a hard time with cubic. It works nicely.

      • LazaroFilm
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        4 walls 30% gyro infill. Strong as a rock.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          Increase the extrusion width on the infil as well- it’ll print the same amount of material, butb juice the strength phenomenally. 150% of default (which is usually at or near nozzle width,) for appearance parts. 200% for strength